Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
CALLICO.
@callico
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
988subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001527044679 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @callico |
| Description | ㅤ Jubilee O‘ Fête—Escapade; ❲ 1820th ❳ Betwixt jollification moreover jubilance frolics unfasten arterial flippancy vivacious sequels. @TheCallico: Funky evidence entirely youths cavorted @Callicobot amused shade—game. Exuberant endeavour, blithesome. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/callico |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 988 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 988 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 228
- Videos
- 137
- Links
- 114
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/callico/22856?comment=31717 ehh 08 berapaa?
Ghaz 🥺🥺
Merinding
https://t.me/callico/22848?comment=31639 ganteng banget.. 🥺
besok
kita kaya gitu lagi col
when ya
Col
p
ayooo ih
Apaan tuh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @callico. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 169,162 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@RhythmOfWeeknd · 462 posts𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗘𝗦𝗦 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡.
@ACCESSTATION · 1391 postAELTENCY disbeng.
@Aeltency · 601 postAltergomino!
@Altergomino · 1211 postANARCHY-PURGE
@AnarchyPurge · 991 postBeauxbatons’ Memorandum
@Beauxarchives · 61 post𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝗻𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆
@Demiurgest · 1201 postGreshou's Archive.
@Greshous · 71 posthanni de lune! ‹3
@HanniDeLune · 1631 postImphooligan’s Junk.
@Imphooligans · 41 postDepository.
@JapaneseDepot · 31 postArchives
@KalletyFiles · 41 postSeitsetine
@Seitsetine · 171 postFraud record of Stripe Jeans.
@SwindleSheet · 31 postCHINATOWN
@TheChiTown · 781 post𝐌𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐭𝐚 𝐃𝐮𝐫𝐦𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠.
@TheDurmstrang · 1261 postGaeguri of Yeojin! 𔘓
@Yeoguri · 441 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CatharticYoon · 116 postsThe Eerie Splendid Folk, Groeneveld.
@GroeneveId · 856 postsAltergomino!
@Altergomino · 1211 postANARCHY-PURGE
@AnarchyPurge · 991 postBenjamin's warehouse
@benjaism · 131 postCafoure's Warehouse.
@Cafourechive · 51 postCheerkies’s dossiers. 📁♡
@Cheersfile · 61 postChinese Youth Safekeep.
@ChiyousKeep · 121 postArchive
@dearute · 101 postDenken, Durven, Doen; Echo Ridge University.
@EridgeUniversity · 2721 postEXPLOSION. #EXIST
@Explodesion · 1541 postGrachter.
@GrachterFiles · 361 postThe pounding in our heart and nervousness will shaking you awake
@hyetrups · 121 postSchool Archive
@izschoolchive · 91 postDreamixx﹔Beautical Sonar.
@nmixxversee · 141 post𝕽𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦 o𝙵 𝕬𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘺 ✶ 𝓣𝚘𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚕 𝔗𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚠
@ReverieOfAmity · 6,5051 postSeitsetine
@Seitsetine · 171 postReverie Ledger: JUEUNYX.
@TheJueunyx · 151 postHouse of Stahlbaum: A Winter Court Shaped by the Nutcracker Waltz.
@TheStahlbaum · 13,0031 postThe Faerie Ring of Sylmëre.
@THESYLMERE · 1441 postHidden Petals.
@tyunra · 131 postVenture Karina’s
@Venturinas · 101 postGaeguri of Yeojin! 𔘓
@Yeoguri · 441 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CALLICO.” (@callico), 988 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/callico.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.