Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AELTENCY disbeng.

@Aeltency

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001549731328
TypeChannel
Username@Aeltency
DescriptionThe histrionics with alluring recondite thew, ancient, classic but dashing—neoteric force. A futuristic exquisite with riotous and delinquent act, favour to play the game and gain the triumph without a intricate emulation. The prodigious one, @AeltencyBot
Created18 July 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Aeltency

Growth

608 August 2026 — 60 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:3060no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:4660first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 18 July 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
3
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 2 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆952.9%
529.4%
❤‍🔥15.88%
💯15.88%
🥰15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2022 to 30 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Apr 2023, 04:31 UTC235 viewsread 10 August 2026

hi,,, aiwjaiwksiwk mmf yh kita ghosting lm soalny kt adalah orang sbux chuakzz jdi kt mau umumin kalau kt dah bubar ygy,,, kt hrus berpisah sampai disini 😿😿 kenyataan mmglah menyakitkan,, smpai jumpa lagi sayonara.. jdi bot sdh tdk berfungsi lg yhhh,, yg minta sfs dan hfw kmi sdh tdk menerima,, tpi klau sekedar mengobrol sjj bleh,, silahkan cht bot kmi xixixi mksh smuany

19 Mar 2023, 10:16 UTC195 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @callicoVideo

yu sp mw jdi manager kmi?? ni kita lgi mncri manager yg kren speti kmi ini,,, gk prcya?? km bisa sukses klo km prcya. wow bkn [mlihat langit] kmi mencari paps atau mams yg bsa editing jg wording,, hms jga yg bisa membimbing kmi [smisal] kmi melakukan plencengan sosial… soalna kmi suka naik mio petantang petenteng pke srung gtu [mmbuka jok mtor] brp mas besin na?? “hmm,,, udh bertahan sejauh ap km untuk tdk mencoba ke

19 Mar 2023, 04:27 UTC98 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BoplanFTWPhoto

ㅤㅤ <᯽> 𝗦𝗵𝗲𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿's 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹-𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗴𝗼𝗱𝘀, 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴's 𝗯𝗶𝗿𝘁𝗵𝗱𝗮𝘆 — 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗿𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀, 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘀; 𝐇𝐚𝐧 𝐘𝐮𝐣𝐢𝐧 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗲𝗽

21 Sept 2022, 12:00 UTC416 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Beauteous pulchritude hitherto the adventurous journey o' blazing sacchariferous, exquisite equilibrium betwixt these facades shan't be gone for merely treacherous zone of kaleidoscope. Phantasmagoria in fantabulous spectrums that is macademizing e'ry pavements that they have taken since the first day of new century—the year 2000 to be exact, Glyphs of clandestine in myriad beguile, youthful tremulous to ever resonat

🏆51❤‍🔥1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Aeltency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,097,251 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AELTENCY disbeng.” (@Aeltency), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aeltency.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.