4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,928–3,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 14:52
3,930
-6
11 Aug 2026, 23:42
3,936
-6
7 Aug 2026, 14:17
3,942
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:05
3,942
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 16 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
228 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
136
59.6%
👍
39
17.1%
🔥
34
14.9%
🍾
8
3.51%
😢
4
1.75%
😁
3
1.32%
🥰
3
1.32%
🤩
1
0.439%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2023 to 22 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Где искать вакансии, кроме hh.ru?
Рассказывает Наталья Золотова, ментор Solvery, ведущий системный аналитик
Если вы ищете работу, то наверняка первым делом заходите на hh.ru. Но этот сайт – далеко не единственный способ найти интересные вакансии. Вот несколько альтернативных каналов, которые помогут расширить горизонты поиска.
Не ограничивайтесь одним-двумя каналами. Совмещайте активный поиск (отклики) с пассивным…
🎓 Первое сентября позади, а это значит, что настало время наращивать свою экспертизу.
В честь прошедшего дня знаний, коллеги собрали подборку каналов для аналитиков AnalystHub.
Практика, экспертиза и полезные материалы – всё это собрано в папке. Хотите совершенствоваться? Подпишитесь на нужные каналы или сразу на все, чтобы не упустить ничего важного.
📂 Забрать папку себе
Вчера ко мне обратилась ученица с просьбой показать как оформлять документацию в confluence и какие там есть доп.возможности.
В связи с этим у меня вопрос
Когда я публиковала последний пост, у меня задублировалась картинка и почему-то не прикрепилась к самому посту, а опубликовалась отдельно.
Когда я увидела, что прикрепилось 2 одинаковые картинки вместо одной, я решила вторую удалить, но что-то пошло не так и у меня удалились все комментарии, которые вы писали к постам🥲
Я написала в тех.поддержку в надежде, что они помогут все восстановить, но вот уже конец января, …
Не хочется уходить в новый год с долгами, поэтому, вот продолжение по проектированию БД🌟
В посте мы разобрали концептуальный уровень проектирования БД, сфокусировавшись на системе учета данных о котиках. Теперь давайте перейдем к следующему этапу - логическому уровню проектирования.
🔍 Логический уровень - это этап, на котором мы определяем, как будут структурированы данные в базе. На этом уровне важно проработать н…
С наступающим Новым Годом, уважаемые системные аналитики! В этот праздничный период хочется пожелать вам не только успешных проектов и легких решений, но и ясности ума, чтобы видеть скрытые возможности в каждой задаче. Пусть ваш аналитический взгляд всегда находит оптимальные пути к цели, а каждый новый день приносит вдохновение и новые идеи. И, конечно, не забывайте о балансе между работой и отдыхом, чтобы каждый мо…
Рассказываю, где пропадала все это время🙈
Было несколько месяцев путешествий я побывала в Черногории, Турции, поездила по России и Сербии.
Я сменила работу, а это очень сложный эмоционально процесс, так как на предыдущем месте я проработала больше 4 лет. Ну и конечно поиск работы и погружение в новый проект отнимает много сил.
Много активности в рамках школы системного анализа, я веду там воркшопы по проектировани…
❤39🔥12👍2🤩1
Signed Наталья Золотова
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @cacaovmacao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2023 to 22 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,479,516 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки системного аналитика” (@cacaovmacao), 3,930 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cacaovmacao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
