Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Catoverflow@Reserve

@c_res

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

371subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001148766092
TypeChannel
Username@c_res
DescriptionSFW, free to forward Links: - Blog: https://c-j.dev - Random things (request to join) https://t.me/+dDmXkeAN6REyZDFl Tags: #research #dream #random #reading
Created29 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/c_res

Growth

370371370.57 Aug 2026, 13:48 — 370 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:24 — 371 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:19 — 371 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:488 Aug 2026, 06:19
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 370–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:19371no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:24371+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:48370first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 18 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
145.3%
avg views ÷ 371 subscribers
Avg views / post
539
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.186%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (18 September 20257 August 2026)
Views total1,078
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
373
Videos
8
Links
547

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4147.1%
🥰2124.1%
🤣1213.8%
😢66.90%
😁33.45%
🌚11.15%
👀11.15%
👏11.15%
🔥11.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC843 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

许久没有见过这样力透纸背的文字了。 2006年8月2日上午,我在母亲房中无忧无虑的玩着45度俯视角射击游戏孤单枪手2,母亲穿上衣服和鞋子,站在门口对我说要去北京办点事情,我随意应承了一句,瞟了一眼门口,然后继续打击异形保护地球。四天后,我亲手给她拔下管子。 终于二十年了。 让我想起了《项脊轩志》: 庭有枇杷树,吾妻死之年所手植也,今已亭亭如盖矣 https://t.me/SteamVents/455

😢1

31 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC235 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

好久没玩群星了,运营了半天,拿9k舰容一堆buff打25倍天灾没有对面回血快🤣。这就是新时代的数值吗

🔥1

2 Jun 2026, 16:45 UTC439 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Google map 最近的小问题好多,一开始是坚持让我们走更远的路,直到最后一刻才意识到我们选的这条更近;今天又发生了把两个上车地点不同的公交线路一起显示的问题,我到了A的车站发现要乘B。评论区近期也是差评如潮,不知道是不是靠 AI 降本增笑了

😁3

6 Apr 2026, 20:32 UTC610 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

很久以前看过《这里没有逆模因部》,是非常棒的科幻小说,推荐一下 https://t.me/hacker_news_feed/126794

6

12 Mar 2026, 10:01 UTC608 viewsread 8 August 2026

又到了植树节!想和大家一起再种一颗 tgcn 频道树🌳!(这次有更多功能可以玩哦~) 这里是 Catoverflow@Reserve,是 @Ship_Overboard 的树枝 🌿 在频道树的第 3 层~ (如果你也有公开频道,想成为这个频道的树叶的话,就点击下面的「成为树叶」吧! > <) ‎

17 Feb 2026, 02:21 UTC430 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

祝大家有无穷的精力、无穷的气运和无穷的爱!

26

29 Jan 2026, 21:32 UTC532 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Murtaugh List: Pull an all nighter. Eat an entire pizza in one sitting. Hang posters on your wall without frames. Get ear pierced. Do laundry at Mum's house. Crash on a friend's futon instead of getting a hotel room. Put off going to the doctor. Drinking shots with strangers. Leave an annoying two-person message on your answering machine. Help someone move out of a six-floor walk up in exchange for pizza and beer. Dy

😢5

28 Dec 2025, 20:11 UTC438 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hackernewslive

Growing up in "404 Not Found": China's nuclear city in the Gobi Desert Article, Comments

20 Dec 2025, 08:18 UTC411 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @justAboringchannelPhoto

一个向世界发送爱的电波的游戏——如此美味🥹🥹🥹——“这也太可爱了” 难以想象是可以免费玩到的 #Game

3👀1

19 Dec 2025, 18:43 UTC290 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hacker_news_feed

Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest (🔥 Score: 227+ in 47 minutes) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6HNww Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6HNww

18 Nov 2025, 20:42 UTC480 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

放烟花喽,cloudflare 炸完 Github 炸 https://www.githubstatus.com/

🤣12

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @c_res. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 589,089 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Catoverflow@Reserve” (@c_res), 371 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_res.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.