Channel
@bzboys_br
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001443491839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bzboys_br |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bzboys_br |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 70 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 67 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 67 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 7 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 62.5% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2023 to 8 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2023 to 8 September 2024. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
#AD: Conheça os seguintes canais de K-pop e entretenimento e acompanhe o seu favorito. ۶⋅ ᴀsɪᴀɴ sᴏɴɢs: @asianSongs1 ۶⋅ ᴀsɪᴀɴ ᴘʜᴏᴛᴏs: @asianPhotos ۶⋅ ʙɪɢʙᴀɴɢ: @portalBIGBANG ۶⋅ ʙᴛs: @armysnews ۶⋅ ʙᴛs ᴄᴏʟʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ: @acervodobts ۶⋅ ᴄ-ᴘᴏᴘ: @cpopbr ۶⋅ ғᴇʟɪx: @felixskzbr ۶⋅ ɪᴜ: @iu_brasil ۶⋅ ɪᴠᴇ: @ivebrazil ۶⋅ ᴊɪsᴏᴏ: @portaljisoobrasil ۶⋅ ᴋᴀʀᴅ: @kardmoments ۶⋅ ᴋɪss ᴏғ ʟɪғᴇ: @kissoflifebrz ۶⋅ ᴋ-ɴᴇᴡs: @knewsbrasil ۶⋅ ᴋᴘᴏᴘ ʟᴇᴀ…
❤1
Signed sᴘᴇᴄᴛʀᴇ ʟɪsᴛ 🕷
#AD: Conheça os seguintes canais de K-pop e entretenimento e acompanhe o seu favorito. ۶⋅ ʙᴛs: @armysnews ۶⋅ ʙᴛs ᴄᴏʟʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ: @acervodobts ۶⋅ ᴄ-ᴘᴏᴘ: @cpopbr ۶⋅ ғᴇʟɪx: @felixskzbr ۶⋅ ʜɪɢʜʟɪɢʜᴛ: @highlightbrasil ۶⋅ ᴊɪsᴏᴏ: @portaljisoobrasil ۶⋅ ᴋᴀʀᴅ: @kardmoments ۶⋅ ᴋ-ɴᴇᴡs: @knewsbrasil ۶⋅ ᴋ-ᴘᴏᴘ sᴏɴɢ: @kpop_songg ۶⋅ ʟɪsᴀ: @lisabrasil ۶⋅ ᴍᴀᴍᴀᴍᴏᴏ: @mamamoobrasil ۶⋅ ɴᴇᴡᴊᴇᴀɴs: @njeansbr ۶⋅ ɴᴍɪxx: @nmixxbrasil ۶⋅ ɴᴇxᴢ: @nex…
Signed sᴘᴇᴄᴛʀᴇ ʟɪsᴛ
스트레이(The Stray)- 너,너 🔗 https://youtu.be/dqgK1mSN9Rk?si=25YmEjy9yGdAhhCK 🔗https://youtu.be/qYmxrZw1SdA?si=UJwRn24EiZiMZkQo 🔗https://youtu.be/seM9AFoTSTI?si=yPyQy3pfeK_NITix 🔗https://youtu.be/KDu5dHFVnj0?si=mXlbtXnTo-OvYASk
❤2
Signed .
O TAE VOLTOUUUUUUUUU!!! TAENGKERBELL VOLTOU!! 🔗 https://youtu.be/0nXyusdvmzs?si=-U6hYHpwt9VMXw8U
🥰2😭1
Signed .
©SHOWBOW_jp
❤2
Signed .
©SHOWBOW_jp
Signed .
©SHOWBOW_jp
Signed .
©SHOWBOW_jp
Signed .
[#BZ_BOYS] X(TWITTER) |230907 "A apresentação de hoje foi um sucesso 💚 Vamos nos divertir juntos na apresentação de amanhã 🫶"
Signed .
[#BZ_BOYS] X(TWITTER) | 230907 "Blueness, obrigado por hoje 💚🍀 Estamos ansiosos pela apresentação de amanhã também 🥰"
Signed .
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed .
[💙] ADM quase infarto com as fotos do DD
Signed .
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bzboys_br. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,255,833 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bzboys_br named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BZ-BOYS BRASIL” (@bzboys_br), 70 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bzboys_br.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.