Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -711. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,258–13,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 20:40
12,365
-10
9 Nov 2026, 23:37
12,375
-5
8 Nov 2026, 15:47
12,380
-4
7 Nov 2026, 10:21
12,384
-16
6 Nov 2026, 07:19
12,400
-4
5 Nov 2026, 08:34
12,404
-3
4 Nov 2026, 11:18
12,407
-1
3 Nov 2026, 11:59
12,408
-8
1 Nov 2026, 10:06
12,416
-4
31 Oct 2026, 07:20
12,420
-5
30 Oct 2026, 10:46
12,425
-2
29 Oct 2026, 13:55
12,427
-7
28 Oct 2026, 13:07
12,434
+4
27 Oct 2026, 15:01
12,430
-16
26 Oct 2026, 18:29
12,446
-15
25 Oct 2026, 16:34
12,461
-6
24 Oct 2026, 13:56
12,467
-7
23 Oct 2026, 10:54
12,474
-9
22 Oct 2026, 13:16
12,483
-5
21 Oct 2026, 09:46
12,488
first reading
Engagement
417 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.93%
avg views ÷ 12,365 subscribers
Avg views / post
362
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 417 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 67 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
417 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
24,986
Reactions total
2,050
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 21:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈57,400
Videos
≈10,500
Links
≈21,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
46m 43s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,607 reactions across 397 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,050
73.4%
🔥
505
5.26%
🏆
370
3.85%
❤🔥
259
2.70%
🍾
231
2.40%
🫡
230
2.39%
😭
154
1.60%
💋
125
1.30%
🤯
113
1.18%
🎉
68
0.708%
😁
68
0.708%
🤝
67
0.697%
💘
65
0.677%
🥰
56
0.583%
👀
51
0.531%
✍
48
0.5%
👏
39
0.406%
😍
39
0.406%
🙏
30
0.312%
😎
25
0.26%
2 further kinds
14
0.146%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 397 of the 417 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,607 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 417 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.20%
5 of 417 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
381
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
282
over 400 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 417 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 75 posts held from the last 30 days (10.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🗳 | MELON MUSIC AWARDS 2026 TOP 10
🚨 Não se acomode, precisamos aumentar essa diferença 🚨
📅 Término: 13 de novembro
✅ Categoria: Top 10 Global
📔 Critérios: 60% Kchart Global + 20% Jurados + 20% Votação (Melon + Berriz)
📱 APLICATIVOS:
• MELON ➡️ K-ARMY
• BERRIZ ➡️ Fandom Internacional
📥 1 voto por conta; você pode votar com várias contas no mesmo dispositivo. Você também pode votar pelo navegador.
ℹ️ A votação fin…
🗳 | FANS CHOICE - PRÊMIO MAMA
Muito bem, ARMY, faltam apenas alguns dias para o fim da votação.
Os últimos dias/horas de votação serão uma batalha. Temos fandoms que estão se preparando comprando votos ou usando outros métodos.
Como ARMY, sempre acreditamos que um prêmio é conquistado com trabalho árduo e em equipe, evitando gastar grandes quantias de dinheiro para obtê-lo.
"Comprar votos" é provavelmente a manei…
Um total de 104 pessoas participaram do evento, intitulado "Acampamento no Espectro", incluindo crianças e adolescentes com transtorno do espectro autista e deficiências de desenvolvimento, seus familiares, equipe médica, terapeutas, voluntários e instrutores. Este é o segundo ano consecutivo em que o evento é realizado.
Além do "Programa da Mente" (uma terapia de socialização baseada em música) e do "Brincadeiras d…
📄 | Centro de Tratamento Min Yoongi conclui com sucesso acampamento familiar em comemoração ao seu primeiro aniversário
Para comemorar o primeiro aniversário da inauguração do Centro Min Yoongi, o número de participantes e a programação foram ampliados.
O Hospital Infantil Severance anunciou no dia 10 que o "Centro de Terapia Min Yoongi" realizou um acampamento familiar para crianças e adolescentes com transtorno d…
📄 | Apple Music sobre o BTS:
“Para onde o BTS vai, o mundo do K-pop segue…
O retorno do BTS com Arirang foi o momento mais aguardado do k-pop em 2026, após anos de expectativa crescente!”
📱| “Film out” do BTS é a música japonesa mais transmitida de um ato de K-pop na HISTÓRIA.
— É a PRIMEIRA e ÚNICA música japonesa de um ato de K-pop a superar 300 MILHÕES de streams no Spotify.
📄 | Jimin doou 100 milhões de won ao Rotary International.
Uma faixa exibida na rua revelou a doação privada de Jimin de 100 milhões de won ao Rotary International, no Distrito 3590, destinada ao financiamento de vacinas para a erradicação da poliomielite.
A doação foi direcionada ao programa "Polioplus" do Rotary International, onde foi utilizada para cobrir os custos de suprimentos da vacina oral contra a poliomi…
🎥 | A plataforma de entretenimento doméstico e console de movimento ativo, Nex Playground (@/nexplayground), compartilhou um reel no Instagram anunciando uma colaboração com o BTS para o jogo de ritmo interativo Starri.
A atualização estará disponível na próxima semana e incluirá uma lista especial de dez músicas icônicas que abrangem várias eras da carreira do grupo, permitindo que os jogadores dancem e sigam a cor…
Showing the 12 most recent of 417 posts we hold for @ArmysNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ArmysNews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @ArmysNews as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
7
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
5
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ArmysNews named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@shakiraup named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 30 August 2026 · confirmed gone 24 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@ultrahitskpop named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 30 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@charts_k named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@barmystream named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@gemini named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@felipeneto named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@btsofficial named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Anpansubs OFICIAL @anpansubs · 57,717 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 28 August 2026
🏳️🌈 𝖬𝖴𝖭𝖣𝖮 𝖣𝖮𝖲 𝖡𝖫𝖲 🏳️🌈 @MundoDosBls · 45,632 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 28 August 2026
✨𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗘⁷✨⊙⊝⊜ @BANGTANVERSECANAL · 72,192 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
BTS NEWS ⟭⟬⁷ @TangerinesOfBTS · 91,976 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
Central Doramas™ @CentralDoramas · 46,301 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BTS⁷ NEWS ARMY'S 🌺” (@ArmysNews), 12,365 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArmysNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.