Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
12,900 average views per post against 13,319 subscribers — an engagement rate of 96.8%. Across the 16,230 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,622 subscribers — the middle half sit between 3.34% and 17.3%, with a median of 8.04%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (2 September 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Posts measured
124 of 124 published in the window (0 exact, 124 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,599,410
Mature posts only
98.7% over 77 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 2 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 50 days, net -89,490. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 17:35
13,319
-81,120
25 Sept 2026, 05:42
94,439
+81,125
19 Sept 2026, 15:58
13,314
-90,077
17 Sept 2026, 10:56
103,391
+90,084
17 Sept 2026, 06:56
13,307
-78,536
15 Sept 2026, 10:22
91,843
+78,540
15 Sept 2026, 05:40
13,303
-80,785
13 Sept 2026, 18:38
94,088
-2,449
11 Sept 2026, 21:20
96,537
-2,451
9 Sept 2026, 13:36
98,988
+98,983
7 Sept 2026, 02:00
5
-95,203
6 Sept 2026, 08:37
95,208
+2,014
4 Sept 2026, 09:41
93,194
-370
4 Sept 2026, 01:41
93,564
-609
2 Sept 2026, 19:05
94,173
-77
2 Sept 2026, 14:18
94,250
-1,014
1 Sept 2026, 19:17
95,264
-55
1 Sept 2026, 13:49
95,319
-763
31 Aug 2026, 20:45
96,082
-58
31 Aug 2026, 13:03
96,140
first reading
Engagement
319 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
96.7%
avg views ÷ 13,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,900
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
122
of 319 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
319 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,572,010
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 05:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 35m
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 150 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Кўз учун энг фойдали спорт тури қайси?
Кўз учун энг фойдали спорт турларидан бири — бу стол тенниси.
Кўз тўпнинг узоққа ва яқинга ҳаракатланишини кузатиши ҳисобига кўриш сифати яхшиланади.
Батафсил 👉 @BUXORO
❗️Кўпчилик бола иситмалаганда танага спирт суради. Аммо бунинг жуда катта зарарлари бор. Шулардан 3 тасини билиб олинг.
Яқинларга юбориб огоҳлантириб қўямиз.
Батафсил 👉 @BUXORO
#ТЕЗКОР #ХУШХАБАР
⚡️ ЭНДИ КАТТА КОРХОНАЛАРДА 5 ЙИЛ ИШЛАГАН ХОДИМЛАРНИНГ ФАРЗАНДЛАРИГА КОНТРАКТ ПУЛИ ТЎЛАБ БЕРИЛАДИ!👏
Президент янги имтиёзни эълон қилди!
Камида 1000 нафар ишчиси бор корхоналарда 5 йил ишлаган ходимларнинг фарзандлари учун ОЛИЙ ТАЪЛИМ КОНТРАКТ ТЎЛОВИ ҚОПЛАБ БЕРИЛАДИ!
Бу каби корхоналарни қўллаб-қувватлаш учун Андижоннинг ўзига 20 миллион доллар ажратилади.
Бу бўйича қарор лойиҳасини бир ой ичида…
❗️Хонобод–Андижон ўртасида 78 кмлик пулли автомобиль йўли қурилади
Янги транспорт оқимига мос равишда 78 км узунликдаги «Хонобод–Андижон» пулли автомобиль йўлини лойиҳалаш белгиланди.
🚆Шу ойдан «Тошкент–Андижон» тезюрар поезди қатнови йўлга қўйилиб, сафар вақти 6 соатдан 4 соатга қисқарди.
📌Келгуси йил эса «Тошкент–Андижон» пулли автомобиль йўлини қуриш бўйича амалий ишлар бошланиши режалаштирилган.
Батафсил 👉 @B…
🤔 Kolbasa ishlab chiqaradiganlar o‘z mahsulotini o‘zlari yeyishadimi?
"Kolbasachilar o‘z mahsulotini yemaydi”, degan gapni ko‘p eshitamiz. Lekin bu gap qanchalik haqiqat o'zi?
Javobini ushbu videoda davomida bilib olishingiz mumkin!
Instagram | Telegram | Vebsayt
❗️Қирғизистон билан янги чегара пости очилади
Ўзбекистон ва Қирғизистон ўртасида «Кесканёр» чегара постини очиш бўйича келишувга эришилди.
Янги пост ҳозирги «Дўстлик» постига нисбатан икки баробар катта бўлиши режалаштирилмоқда.
📌 Уч ой ичида унинг лойиҳаси ишлаб чиқилиб, шундан сўнг қурилиш ишлари бошланади.
Батафсил 👉 @BUXORO
Группа, обед... 😋
Иш ўз вақтида, овқат ҳам ўз вақтида бўлгани яхши.
Батафсил 👉 @BUXORO
Showing the 12 most recent of 319 posts we hold for @buxoro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@buxoro edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
BUXORODA BUGUN | БУХОРОДА БУГУН | БУХОРО БУГУН | BUXORO BUGUN I БУХОРО КАНАЛ | БУХОРОЛИКЛАР КАНАЛИ @buxorodabugun · 2,633#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Подольск | События | Подслушано @Podolsk_podslushal · 36,424 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
Тольятти | События | Подслушано @Tolyatti_podslushal · 35,987 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ROMITANLIKLAR | Расмий” (@buxoro), 13,319 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buxoro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.