Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Игорь Бурун | Тренер

Channel

Игорь Бурун | Тренер

@burunigor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

751subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001774123387
TypeChannel
Username@burunigor
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/burunigor

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

745758751.511 August 2026 — 753 subscribers11 August 2026 — 753 subscribers12 August 2026 — 755 subscribers19 August 2026 — 754 subscribers26 August 2026 — 757 subscribers1 September 2026 — 756 subscribers11 September 2026 — 758 subscribers27 September 2026 — 745 subscribers7 October 2026 — 751 subscribers75111 August 20267 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 57 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 743–760 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 19:54751+6
27 Sept 2026, 14:39745-13
11 Sept 2026, 05:41758+2
1 Sept 2026, 12:34756-1
26 Aug 2026, 10:52757+3
19 Aug 2026, 03:35754-1
12 Aug 2026, 11:16755+2
11 Aug 2026, 20:00753no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:47753first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

292 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5197350061012436657292100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 11 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @burunigor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC363 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Пока по тренировкам ничего нового, поэтому побуду фудблогером. Сегодня возникло желание непреодолимой силы сделать себе большую шаверму, и вот она перед вами. Армянский лаваш — 250 г Помидор — 1 шт. Огурец — 1 шт. Кетчуп томатный — 50 г Провансальский соус майонезный низкокалорийный — 50 г Сыр плавленый высокобелковый — 80 г Филе куриной грудки запечённое — 160 г Ветчина из грудки индейки с паприкой — 30 г …

custom 519735006101243665719

29 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC670 views25 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Короче, вот простой рецепт, как сделать скучное, уже приевшееся филе индейки или курицы вкуснее и интереснее. Мне, если честно, индейка и так заходит уже несколько лет без проблем, но иногда всё равно хочется чего-то новенького. И вот такие простые рецепты отлично помогают разбавить пищевую рутину. В общем: 1 яйцо Пачка чипсов 500 г индейки Индейку нарезаем (лучше чуть мельче, чем у меня), макаем в яйцо и обвалив…

custom 519735006101243665725

27 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC626 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Потянул 200×10 как никогда легко (смотрите сами). Судя по видео, можно было потерпеть и сделать 13–15 повторений, но такой задачи я себе не ставил. В общем и целом, тренировка получилась отличной. Думаю, в этом зале я бы точно накачался. В следующий раз, надеюсь, проблем с записью видео уже не будет, и с третьей попытки я наконец сделаю то, что должен — выдам качественный контент. 🫡 P.S. Дмитрий Рекордов сегодня т…

custom 519735006101243665724

25 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC747 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Видео с красивого зала не получилось, зато есть еще одно видео с рабочего зала. Лайки и комментарии всегда приветствуются. https://youtu.be/63NGmHJMLXk?si=OvqO2dHG9KJI2L5H

custom 519735006101243665716

24 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC616 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Сегодня ломал тренажеры в самом красивом зале СПб. Возможно, позже будет небольшой обзор. Как оказалось совсем мало контента снял…🥲

custom 519735006101243665723

22 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC727 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Просто тренировка низа. Присед: 150х8 Мостик: 230х12 Столбы: 1 на Макс Пресс: 1 на Макс Вторую тренировку низа можно будет увидеть на ютубе уже в эту субботу 🤝 можно подумать вы там чего-то не видели 🫡

custom 519735006101243665718

20 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC700 views39 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Вот 7 лет назад я пожал 120×2. Я уже и забыл, что когда-то этот вес был для меня настолько тяжёлым. И сейчас я понимаю, что время в зале было потрачено не зря: прогресс есть, травм нет, я в строю, и это главное. И сегодня, даже спустя столько лет, мне удаётся продолжать прогрессировать, несмотря на то, что сейчас сделать это гораздо сложнее. Кто-то скажет, что сейчас прогресс идёт медленно. Но это взгляд человека, к…

custom 519735006101243665739

18 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC728 views35 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026

Я в очередной раз вернулся на YouTube. И, как обычно, первый блин комом: видео получилось немного «тёплым», неправильно выставил баланс белого. Но нам ведь важнее содержание, а не форма. А содержание этого видео, думаю, будет полезно многим начинающим и даже чуть более опытным атлетам. Второе видео уже тоже готово и выйдет через неделю. Там с балансом белого, кажется, уже разобрался. Поддержите начинающего блогера …

custom 519735006101243665735

15 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC811 views32 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Video

Щас чо?

custom 519735006101243665732

6 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,150 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Когда пожму 140×5, открою комменты, чтобы послушать, что скажут хейтеры. Сегодня было близко. Может, даже и пожал бы, но у Жени вдруг сдали нервы, и он слегка коснулся штанги. А как мы знаем, это не в счёт. Так или иначе, на сегодня это мой лучший жим. Работаем дальше🫡

custom 519735006101243665734

29 Jun 2026, 11:43 UTC≈1,270 views27 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Следуя своей концепции тренинга — чем меньше лишнего, тем легче сохранять постоянство — сегодня потренировался максимально ёмко. Времени было буквально 30 минут, и хотелось бы ничего не пропустить. Поэтому совместил несколько задач: хват потренировал ещё во время разминки в тяге (140-180-200кг без лямок прямым хватом), а затем перешёл к рабочим подходам: 210-220-230×2 без всего. И в конце один подход в жиме ногами д…

custom 519735006101243665727

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @burunigor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ivan Krasavin
@IvanKrasavin · 24,843
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Игорь Бурун | Тренер” (@burunigor), 751 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/burunigor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.