Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Budaykhanov
@budaykhanov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
286subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001110238639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @budaykhanov |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/budaykhanov |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:39 | 286 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 287 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 289 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 288 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 288 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 38s
- Average length
- 1m 12s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
46 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5300872143079239267 | 16 | 34.8% | |
| custom 5303362128894254415 | 10 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5301137872705843459 | 8 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5300750728648746304 | 5 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5303002811930273554 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| custom 5303111165365214710 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5303341723504632012 | 2 | 4.35% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Почему 80% тренировок уходят «в молоко», если ты просыпаешься уставшим? 🧠💤 Ты можешь идеально расписать силу, выносливость и питание, но если твоя нервная система не восстанавливается ночью — физиологическая адаптация блокируется. Мы подготовили «ЦИРКАДНЫЙ КОД ЧЕМПИОНА» — ежемесячный трекер и научное руководство по настройке сна, дофамина и энергии. Что внутри файла: 1. Распечатываемый трекер на 30 дней (с подсчет…
custom 53033621288942544152
Картина есть, осталось добавить этно меню), soon как говорится)
custom 53011378727058434591
Когда послушал советы клиентов)))
custom 53008721430792392671
Что попало не читает)
custom 53008721430792392672
Мы думали, что мы на дне, а нам постучали снизу, примерно так, если говорить метафорами)))
Коротко обстановка в общепите: мы ждали сезон, а оказывается он был зимой), ну по крайней мере у меня так)
custom 53007507286487463041custom 53008721430792392671custom 53030028119302735541
Кроме оземпика 😂
custom 53007507286487463042
Эспрессо в течения дня может очень хорошо сбивать аппетит, и днем обычно не бывает сильного желания переедать, а есть что нибудь такое, что ночью будет сбивать аппетит, но в то же время не будет мешать уснуть?
Когда приходит стажер и заявляет, что имеет опыт работы, что справится, либо он быстрообучаемый, с ним возятся день, два, тратят продукты, время, внимание, а он по факту не подходит близко, только вред по факту, почему ему нужно еще платить за стажировку? Везде так?
custom 53033621288942544152
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlChGbUab9K_QvkDU_JIp1e_W7Rdpvp07&si=3k4ggn5-0viXeOfn
custom 53033417235046320122custom 53008721430792392671custom 53031111653652147101
Наверное у ибн къайма в книгах разбираются такие душевные тонкости, но я впервые услышал от проповедника этот вопрос с такой точки зрения, очень интересно до конца дослушать этот цикл лекций, возможно поделюсь ссылкой 🔗
custom 53008721430792392671custom 53011378727058434591custom 53033621288942544151
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @budaykhanov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Budaykhanov” (@budaykhanov), 286 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/budaykhanov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.