3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 354–357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 12:39
354
-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:03
357
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:15
357
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
38.3%
avg views ÷ 354 subscribers
Avg views / post
136
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
20 (20 May 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
813
Reactions total
29
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
134 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
36
26.9%
👏
16
11.9%
🤡
13
9.70%
🖕
10
7.46%
🤔
10
7.46%
🌭
9
6.72%
❤
8
5.97%
🔥
7
5.22%
🗿
7
5.22%
🌚
6
4.48%
🥰
4
2.99%
🫡
4
2.99%
🤬
3
2.24%
🕊
1
0.746%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот и официальный комментарий Дурова* по факту признания его террористом.
Смысл примерно в следующем: «В России я террорист, потому что отказался от слежки в ТГ. Мне запретили писать посты. Чиновники явно попутали».
* признан террористом и экстремистом. (или раз мы в ТГ, то можем не писать вот эту штуку?)
Когда Дурова прессовали французы, в России на официальном уровне заявлялось, что НА РОДИНЕ куда спокойнее. Слава богу, что мы демократическая страна, не то что эта ваша Франция.
А вот что говорил один известный исполнитель в одежде с надписью «Я русский».
— Паша, родной, свободно и легко дышится только в России. Возвращайся домой. Здесь тебя всегда помнят, ждут и любят.
Теперь точно ждут. Но не факт, что любят.))
Такс-такс-такс... разбана Телеги нам не видать теперь точно.
ФСБ России говорит, что через мессенджер Telegram, а вернее через чат-бот в нём, спецслужбы Украины якобы вербовали россиян для совершения диверсий.
Уфф... ну что тут можно сказать. Наверное, можно повторить классику: «Предлагаю запретить слова. Есть информация, что с их помощью общаются террористы».
Теперь ФСБ заявило, что Павел Дуров объявлен в междуна…
Ааа, так вот, почему забанили домен. Всему виной VPN*. Не сама технология, а один из её представителей – First VPN Service (или 1VPN).
Европол (полиция ЕС по борьбе с ОПГ) считает, что этот ВПН-сервис рекламировался на российских форумах, связанных с киберпреступностью. И каким-то невероятным образом домен t.me был с ним связан. Как только все убедились, что КВН и Т.МЕ не связаны, всех, кого надо, разбанили.
А что …
Сегодня возникли проблемки со ссылками t.me, но сейчас уже вроде отлегло.
В свете этого Павел Дуров вспомнил, что существует Twitter (который сейчас Х - Икс, Хэ, Десять), через который он обратился к владельцам домена в Черногории, и попросил порешать вопросик.
Так россияне узнали о существовании Черногории.
«Альтернативный клиент» для Telegram объявил, что закрывается с 1 июля.
Создатели приложения сказали, что «не могут обеспечить полную локализацию и соответствие всем требованиям». В числе причин — внешние ограничения со стороны платформ, мощностями которых пользовался клиент.
Известно, что частично это были мощности VK. Связано ли это с ними — неясно.
Однако вызывает вопросы фраза о том, что бизнес-модель была жив…
Дуров провёл расследование и выяснил, что компания Indian Telecom Reliance блокирует доступ к мессенджеру даже в Эмиратах.
Более того, эта организация связана с той-самой-компанией Марка Цукерберга: Дуров говорит, что речь идёт о частичном владении. Из этого он делает вывод: это всё дело рук конкурентов. Теперь Павел подозревает, что обе компании стояли за блокировкой мессенджера в Индии.
Индийская сила...
Telegram заблокировали в Индии.
Павел Дуров рассказал, что некие ребята слили в ТГ ответы на ЕГЭ, а Шиве властям страны это не понравилось.
– Это наказывает 150 миллионов обычных пользователей Telegram в Индии, а не инсайдеров, которые слили экзаменационные материалы, – подчеркнул Дуров.
Он сказал, что запрет не помог – ответы стали скидывать в других приложениях (в MAX?). Однако тут же отметил, что подчистил неск…
😁6🗿1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brown_room. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Brown Room | Блокировка Telegram” (@brown_room), 354 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brown_room.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.