Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подкаст «Бреслав и Ложечкин»

Channel

Подкаст «Бреслав и Ложечкин»

@breslavandlozhechkin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,030subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001943180081
TypeChannel
Username@breslavandlozhechkin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/breslavandlozhechkin

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0282,0452,036.56 August 2026 — 2,041 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,041 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,042 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,045 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,042 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,039 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,038 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,034 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,032 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,030 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,028 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,030 subscribers2,0306 August 202614 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,025–2,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 05:192,030+2
10 Sept 2026, 18:412,028-2
6 Sept 2026, 03:192,030-2
1 Sept 2026, 14:342,032-2
26 Aug 2026, 11:432,034-4
23 Aug 2026, 14:032,038-1
20 Aug 2026, 00:412,039-3
16 Aug 2026, 15:222,042-3
12 Aug 2026, 16:332,045+3
7 Aug 2026, 00:512,042+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:212,041no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:172,041first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

584 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥20535.1%
👍18231.2%
❤17530.0%
❤‍🔥71.20%
🎉20.342%
👎20.342%
💯20.342%
😍20.342%
⚡10.171%
✍10.171%
👏10.171%
🖕10.171%
😱10.171%
🤝10.171%
🤮10.171%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 584 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
80.0%
16 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
16
posts carrying an erid · 16 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,530
over 16 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,960
over 4 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjbocFa3113 July 202613 July 2026
2SDnjbxnLow113 May 202513 May 2025
2SDnjcGcXCE110 April 202610 April 2026
2SDnjcJ3dSD110 July 202510 July 2025
2SDnjckmypJ111 August 202511 August 2025
2SDnjdYcw7j112 June 202512 June 2025
2SDnjdeUUKZ111 November 202511 November 2025
2SDnjdmzt48111 February 202611 February 2026
2SDnjdtpQyM110 October 202510 October 2025
2SDnje9n8LN110 September 202510 September 2025
2SDnje9usw5111 December 202511 December 2025
2SDnjeA5dRv110 April 202510 April 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 4 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 13 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC≈3,270 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjbocFa3Photo

Бреслав и Ложечкин #39 — Зачем писать себе некролог Обсудили в выпуске, зачем писать самому себе некролог и как это связано с практикой Amazon Working Backwards. Если серьёзно - обсудили, как можно относиться к себе, как к продукту, как с помощью LLM сделать себе нормальный план развития и как агентов использовать для того, чтобы самому себе помогать по этому плану идти. Партнёр команды Podlodka — наши давние друзь…

❤12👍5🔥5👎1😱1

8 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,410 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет! Это Андрей Бреслав 👋 Если у вас есть минут пять времени, вы можете нам очень помочь. Сейчас мы с командой активно работаем над новой версией CodeSpeak, и нам было бы очень ценно узнать про ваш личный опыт работы с агентами. Если у вас есть пять минут, то пройдите наш небольшой опрос. А если у вас есть чуть больше времени, то ребята из команды будут рады созвониться с вами и погадают более подробные вопр…

👍12❤4🔥4

10 Jun 2026, 15:33 UTC≈4,970 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjeJxBbgPhoto

Бреслав и Ложечкин #38 — Software 1.0 -> 2.0 -> 3.0. Что идёт на смену коду? Обсудили ставшую популярной с лёгкой руки Андрея Карпатого тему Software 3.0, когда код вроде бы писать уже будет не надо и когда код, якобы, станет вообще уже ненужным. А английский (хотя на самом деле любой естественный язык) станет языком программирования. Попытались разобраться, в чём на самом деле разница между всеми этими Software 1.0…

❤9👍6🔥4

16 May 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,960 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет! Я в недавнем выпуске просил поделиться с нами логами ваших сессий с агентами, если не жалко, но забыл куда бы то ни было опубликовать детали 🙈 Мне несколько человек написали в личку и в комменты (огромное спасибо, ребята!), так что пишу сюда, чтобы было видно всем. Что делаем: используем реальные логи сессий, чтобы сделать инструмент, который помогает не терять ваш интент и восстанавливает его из тех со…

👍9❤3🔥3

12 May 2026, 16:24 UTC≈4,340 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjeTbxQAPhoto

Бреслав и Ложечкин #37 — Ответы на вопросы слушателей Провели эксперимент и вместо одной большой темы постарались обсудить несколько поменьше и ответить при этом на вопросы наших слушателей. Спасибо вам за вопросы! Будем признательны за обратную связь по такому формату выпуска и за новые вопросы! Партнёр команды Podlodka — наши давние друзья @AvitoTech. Это команда с крутыми процессами, культурой здравого смысла и …

👍14❤4🔥3❤‍🔥1💯1

10 Apr 2026, 18:07 UTC≈2,550 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjcGcXCEPhoto

Бреслав и Ложечкин #36 — Новый ЯП эпохи ИИ: отвечаем на вопросы про CodeSpeak Андрей отвечает на вопросы и комментарии к выпуску 35. Партнёр команды Podlodka — наши давние друзья @AvitoTech. Это команда с крутыми процессами, культурой здравого смысла и эксперимента. Узнать про их технологии, подходы и прокачку компетенций в командах можно по ссылке: https://clck.ru/3T3emk Слушать выпуск: Telegram Mave Apple Castbo…

👍14❤3🔥2🤮1

11 Mar 2026, 18:19 UTC≈5,600 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjf4Duz1Photo

Бреслав и Ложечкин #35 — Новый язык программирования для эпохи ИИ Поговорили о том, что происходит с разработкой софта с использованием LLM и о новом стартапе Андрея Бреслава CodeSpeak, который поменяет парадигму программирования и сделает нас в несколько раз продуктивнее. Партнёр команды Podlodka — наши давние друзья @AvitoTech. Это команда с крутыми процессами, культурой здравого смысла и эксперимента. Узнать про…

🔥20❤9👍3😍2🖕1

19 Feb 2026, 17:08 UTC≈2,370 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Инк» @incrussiamedia опросили 52 предпринимателя о том, какие телеграм-каналы они читают, и включили нас в подборку из 170+ рекомендаций! Рады быть в такой компании 🙂 Полный список можно посмотреть 👉🏻 здесь

🔥34👍7

11 Feb 2026, 16:45 UTC≈5,610 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjdmzt48Photo

Бреслав и Ложечкин #34 — Stakeholder Management Обсудили такую загадочную и непонятную многим тему - Stakeholder management. Кто такие stakeholder'ы, почему важно ими "управлять", как это делать. Что будет, если этого не делать? Спойлер: это важно и нужно всем, кто хочет сделать что-то большое и не оказаться при этом под руководителем, который ничего не понимает в технологиях, но хорошо умеет "Stakeholder management…

👍23❤14🔥10

12 Jan 2026, 17:06 UTC≈5,530 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjepE2HnPhoto

Бреслав и Ложечкин #33 — О планах и мечтах Зачем нужны планы и планирование? Как правильно строить планы? И можно ли их вообще строить нормально? Что такое цель и чем она отличается от мечты? Партнёр команды Podlodka — наши давние друзья @AvitoTech. Это команда с крутыми процессами, культурой здравого смысла и эксперимента. Узнать про их технологии, подходы и прокачку компетенций в командах можно по ссылке: https:/…

❤21🔥11👍8✍1

11 Dec 2025, 13:08 UTC≈5,330 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnje9usw5Photo

Бреслав и Ложечкин #32 — Платформы - хорошие, плохие, злые Внутренние платформы - это всегда повод для ссор, конфликтов и проблем. Что лучше - внутренние платформы или кладбища велосипедов? Ответ на этот вопрос вы не найдёте в этом выпуске, но зато найдёте пространные рассуждения на эту тему и полезные инсайты. Партнёр команды Podlodka — наши давние друзья @AvitoTech. Это команда с крутыми процессами, культурой здр…

❤16👍10❤‍🔥6

11 Nov 2025, 16:30 UTC≈5,470 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjdeUUKZPhoto

Бреслав и Ложечкин #31 — Дофамин Поговорили про дофамин и его влияние на нашу жизнь. Мы не учёные, поэтому говорили скорее не о теории, а о практике его влияния на нашу жизнь. Обсудили опыт, как дофаминовую мотивацию использовать себе на пользу и не дать использовать себе во вред. Партнёр команды Podlodka — наши давние друзья @AvitoTech. Это команда с крутыми процессами, культурой здравого смысла и эксперимента. Уз…

❤17👍13🔥11🎉1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @breslavandlozhechkin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подкаст «Бреслав и Ложечкин»” (@breslavandlozhechkin), 2,030 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/breslavandlozhechkin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.