Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БПЛА инфо

Channel

БПЛА инфо

@bplainfo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,571subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001514144002
TypeChannel
Username@bplainfo
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bplainfo

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5591,5711,5657 August 2026 — 1,559 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,559 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,560 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,562 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,559 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,561 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,560 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,564 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,566 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,564 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,561 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,566 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,569 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,571 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,557–1,573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:361,571+2
14 Sept 2026, 20:211,569+3
11 Sept 2026, 11:161,566+5
6 Sept 2026, 08:201,561-3
1 Sept 2026, 21:471,564-2
30 Aug 2026, 06:591,566+2
27 Aug 2026, 10:111,564+4
20 Aug 2026, 04:461,560-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:331,561+2
13 Aug 2026, 13:471,559-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:211,562+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:071,560+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:031,559no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:561,559first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 18s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁832.0%
🔥624.0%
🎉312.0%
🕊312.0%
❤28.00%
😢28.00%
👍14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC168 viewsread 7 August 2026

Для операторов FPV открываются карьерные перспективы. https://t.me/Reddit/49833

31 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC345 viewsread 7 August 2026

Вот, собственно, разгадка. https://t.me/chadayevru/4995 Вместо того чтобы запустить несколько конкурирующих проектов, тему отдали на откуп "увожаемым" людям с админресурсом, которые не потянули. В результате у нас до сих пор нет "грузовиков", за что приходится расплачиваться человеческими жизнями. И сажать тут надо не тех, кто, хоть и коряво, но пытался. А тех, кто принимал такие неграмотные и опасные управленческ…

30 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC403 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Бандероль" под "Орионом". Прям хорошо. Одно плохо - все эти хорошие и полезные выдумки работают в обе стороны. И когда мы говорим об отсутствии у противника способов надежного противодействия реактивным "посылкам", за исключением дорогущих больших зенитных ракет, это касается и нас. А для противодействия такой комбинации высотной платформы запуска и скоростной и относительно дешевой "Бандероли" действительно нужно…

🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC401 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наш "большой" безэкипажный картер. 500 тонн водоизмещение, пока в разработке. Заявлен как средство для поиска подводных лодок. Судя по боевому блоку от панциря, еще и мобильное морское ПВО.

🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,020 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Полный цикл разработки, например дронов любого типа, в специализированном AI-инструменте. По текстовому запросу можно получить схему, детали, спецификации — то есть весь пакет документации для производства. Как и все современные AI-приложения, это не отменяет, а наоборот, требует профильного специалиста для проверки, зато ускоряет работу на порядки. Коммерческий продукт.

👍1

6 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC550 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bes_pilotVideo

Пентагон вложил $28 млн в «невидимый радар» на базе 5G-сетей. ▶️ Управление FutureG Минобороны (точнее Минвойны) США заключило контракт с Cohere Technologies на $28 млн, который предполагает создание системы, превращающей коммерческие сети 5G и 6G в интеллектуальную сенсорную инфраструктуру для выявления беспилотников. Разработка получила название ISAC, и её цель - сделать обычные сотовые вышки «невидимым радаром»,…

3 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC512 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот такие теперь ДПС в Москве. С Елкой и тачанкой.

🔥3🕊3

23 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTC697 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @auantonovPhoto

Вчера и сегодня весь околовоенный российский телеграм делится скриншотом якобы цен, по которым хохлы в Китае закупают моднейшие перехватчики. Типа, это около 100 т.р. за самый дорогой. Следом делаются выводы, что из-за НДС и таможни русский человек ничего в Китае закупить не может, и поэтому мы ничего перехватить не можем. Дроны прилетаеют, всё горит, срочно зовите НКВД и СМЕРШ, будем разбираться, вот — подшейте к м…

17 Jun 2026, 10:05 UTC569 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fpvfunrusVideo

А еще дешевле сможете?

😁5

3 Jun 2026, 14:56 UTC812 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁3😢2

2 Jun 2026, 10:02 UTC682 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @olegtsarovVideo

ТГ-канал @atomiccherry рассказывает об американском дроне Hornet, который широко использует ВСУ. На видео — этот дрон над дорогами Новороссии. Hornet — первое серийное автономное барражирующее оружие. Его особенность — дешевизна. Никаких миллиардов на НИОКР, никаких засекреченных военных технологий. Только гражданские компоненты с десятков заводов по всему миру. Точная цена дрона публично не раскрывается, но по косв…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bplainfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КЦПН. Координационный Центр Помощи Новороссии.
@kcpn2014 · 34,928
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
Military hub | СВО, FPV, дроны, БПЛА
@mil_hub · 25,260
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 September 2026
Техник БПЛА🇷🇺
@texotdelBPLA · 23,524
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
Беспилот | БПЛА, дроны, роботы
@bes_pilot · 43,734
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БПЛА инфо” (@bplainfo), 1,571 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bplainfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.