Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Антон Ботвин | ИИ для бизнеса

Channel

Антон Ботвин | ИИ для бизнеса

@botvinstartap

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

555subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001875078519
TypeChannel
Username@botvinstartap
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/botvinstartap

Growth

555558556.56 August 2026 — 558 subscribers7 August 2026 — 557 subscribers16 August 2026 — 555 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 555–558 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:37555-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:45557-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:48558first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.3%
avg views ÷ 555 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,351
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2826.7%
🙈1817.1%
💯1312.4%
😁1312.4%
👍1211.4%
87.62%
😨32.86%
😱32.86%
😡21.90%
🙏21.90%
👻10.952%
🤝10.952%
🤡10.952%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC62 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нас готовили к миру, которого больше нет Это я про образование. Вокруг того, чему и как учить детей в эпоху нейронок, сейчас тонна споров. Но есть базовые вещи, которые глупо не замечать. Как система устроена сейчас: 🔺 Учитель объясняет тему на весь класс. Один ребенок все понял за минуту и скучает. Второй не понял ничего и тоже считает ворон. Темп один для всех, хотя дети абсолютно разные. 🔺 ИИшка может дать пер

👍6💯2🔥21

4 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC99 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Отдохнул, пора работать, сегодня снова про ИИшку 15 миллионов евро за скрытый ИИ В ЕС вступили в силу новые правила регулирования нейросетей. Теперь за публикацию сгенерированного контента без специальной пометки можно получить штраф до 15 млн евро или 3% от годового оборота компании. Под раздачу попадает все: 🔹 Любые дипфейки, ИИ-картинки, видео и аудио теперь обязаны иметь четкую маркировку. 🔹 Если вместо челов

🙈3🔥1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC122 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Выезд на Онегу Рассказывать, как там было круто, нет никакого смысла. Сделал несколько кадров, которые чуть-чуть передают атмосферу моих 4 дней там. P.S. Там почти нет связи и эти дни я провел без ИИ.

🔥126👍2

30 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC172 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Битва с роботами временно отменяется Корпорации наигрались в тотальную автоматизацию и снова начали набирать людей в штат. Год заморозки вакансий и панических ожиданий, что ИИ заменит всех подряд, закончился банальным пшиком. Руководство компаний признало очевидное: заменить людей алгоритмами не получается. Массовые увольнения отменяются. Но есть один нюанс. Компании теперь ищут не просто специалистов, а тех, кто

😁5👍2💯2🙈2

29 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC151 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ИИ-агенты в маркетинге В череповецкой «Интере» рассказал, как можно уже сейчас автоматизировать бизнес-процессы с помощью ИИ. Сейчас со всех сторон пытаются продать идею, что ИИ уже везде, а вы - последний человек, который ничего в этом не понимает и должен срочно бежать что-то делать. По факту, меньше 1% предпринимателей реально смогли что-то внедрить в свой бизнес. Те, кто действительно умеет собирать подобные к

🔥7💯3👍21

27 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC132 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Варвары нового времени: зачем ИИ-компании уничтожают редкие книги На Reddit разлетелась дикая новость: разработчики ИИ скупают редкие антикварные книги, сканируют их для обучения моделей, а затем физически уничтожают. Под нож идут даже издания, которых на планете осталось всего несколько штук. Звучит как сюжет антиутопии, но реальность банальнее. Что происходит: 🔹 Скорость и качество сканирования. Чтобы быстро ско

🙈8😨3😱3😡2🙏2

24 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC154 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Нарратив «Работать бессмысленно, покупайте Биткоин» Меня взволновала цитата Майкла Сейлора: «Работать упорно - худший совет, который вы можете получить. ИИ будет работать больше вас. Роботы будут работать больше вас. Ваши навыки обесцениваются. Ваш труд теряет ценность каждый день. Люди, которые продолжают продавать своё время, будут бороться. Люди, которые владеют редкими активами, победят. Именно поэтому я полнос

💯6🔥1🤝1

22 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC157 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Реклама приходит в ChatGPT Эра чистого ИИ-поиска без баннеров и навязанных рекомендаций официально подходит к концу. 🍿 Все же понимают, что бесплатные и даже платные подписки за $20 не окупают гигантские счета за электричество и чипы. Альтману нужно кормить инвесторов, поэтому капитализм закономерно победил. 💸 Теперь вместо беспристрастных ответов ИИшка будет аккуратно встраивать в диалог спонсорские ссылки и сове

🔥5🙈2

21 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC155 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Твой роутер знает, с кем ты спишь Домашний вайфай научили видеть людей сквозь стены. Алгоритмы анализируют искажение радиоволн и без видеокамер считывают пульс, дыхание и позу человека, когда тот лежит в соседней спальне. Весь софт пишется на чипе за $5 (проект на Гитхабе набрал уже 82 тысячи звезд). Если полноценную систему подглядывания обычный программист и парочка ИИ собирает за вечер из говна и палок - предст

😁7🙈3👻1🤡1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @botvinstartap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 244,238 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Антон Ботвин | ИИ для бизнеса” (@botvinstartap), 555 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/botvinstartap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.