hi
β€1,810π467π248π»121π€102π€101π₯92π76
Signed οΈ

Channel
@boruto
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
305,475subscribers
-1,635 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 100,000β316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001709740760 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boruto |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boruto |
Gaming β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 305,475 | -291 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 305,766 | -361 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 306,127 | -230 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 306,357 | -294 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 306,651 | -269 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 306,920 | -190 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 307,110 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 307,110 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 November 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
26,267 reactions across 20 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 13,431 | 51.1% | |
| π | 4,717 | 18.0% | |
| π₯ | 2,534 | 9.65% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1,210 | 4.61% | |
| π | 782 | 2.98% | |
| π€― | 501 | 1.91% | |
| β‘ | 290 | 1.10% | |
| π | 275 | 1.05% | |
| π | 200 | 0.761% | |
| π | 174 | 0.662% | |
| π | 173 | 0.659% | |
| π€ | 145 | 0.552% | |
| π€£ | 135 | 0.514% | |
| π± | 130 | 0.495% | |
| π» | 121 | 0.461% | |
| πΏ | 116 | 0.442% | |
| π€· | 115 | 0.438% | |
| π€ | 101 | 0.385% | |
| π€¬ | 87 | 0.331% | |
| π | 86 | 0.327% | |
| 25 further kinds | 944 | 3.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 26,267reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2025 to 13 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
hi
β€1,810π467π248π»121π€102π€101π₯92π76
Signed οΈ
β‘οΈ Naruto Remake? Are you waiting for it? π₯ What anime studio should make this remake? Mappa? π Subscribe π§ Sponsored by @rainbetcom - rainbet.com
β€1,440π252π₯140π113π€·67π±65π€―54π49
π± Ufotable did THISβ¦ A hint about a Demon Slayer continuation just dropped online, and fans are already arguing: new season or a movie? If itβs another film, are you for it or against it? ππ₯ π Subscribe π§ Sponsored by @rainbetcom - rainbet.com
β€769π€―97π₯72π71π40β‘35π26π΄22
π΄ββ οΈ One Piece: Elbaph Arc β The Legend Returns! Luffy and the crew are finally sailing to Elbaf β the mythical island of giants, where every battle could be the epic fight of the year π± Fans are already speculating who will survive and who will fallβ¦ and the discussion is exploding everywhere! Whoβs ready for the ultimate sea battle? π₯ β Canβt wait / π± β My heart canβt take it / π€‘ β Just here for the memes π Subβ¦
β€724π₯137π66π52β€βπ₯49π¨βπ»19π―18β‘17
π Death Note Remake The creator of Death Note is rumored to be rewriting the ending in a remake π³ Not officially confirmed yet, but fans are already arguing: Keep the original ending or change it? π€ π Subscribe π§ Sponsored by @rainbetcom - rainbet.com
β€715π₯102π84π±51π49πΏ40β€βπ₯31π18
β‘οΈ Jujutsu Kaisen: Season 3 π’ Episode 49 - January 8, 2026 π’ Episode 50 - January 15, 2026 π’ Episode 51 - January 22, 2026 (π₯New) π΄ Episode 52 - January 29, 2026 π΄ Episode 53 - February 5, 2026 π΄ Episode 54 - February 12, 2026 π΄ Episode 55 - February 19, 2026 π΄ Episode 56 - February 26, 2026 π΄ Episode 57 - March 5, 2026 π΄ Episode 58 - March 12, 2026 π΄ Episode 59 - March 19, 2026 π΄ Episode 60 - March 26, 2026 π Subsβ¦
β€844π133π₯106β€βπ₯63π€¬48β‘34π21π16
The Blade Can No Longer Be Stopped βοΈ Starting February 6, Japan launches the IMAX screening of Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle. π₯ For the first time in cinema history β IMAX 1.43:1 MORE frame. MORE details. MORE madness. This isnβt just watching. This is an experience. π β IMAX is a must π β Iβll wait to watch it at home π Subscribe: @Only β’ @Netflix β’ @Anime
β€383π122π55β€βπ₯36π15π₯15π13π€£8
π₯ Mappa did it again on Jujutsu Kaisen 3? π Subscribe: @Only β’ @Netflix β’ @Anime
β€457π74π₯67π€―61β€βπ₯50π―24π18π14
β οΈ Jujutsu Kaisen β Season 3 Today π₯π₯π₯ π Subscribe: @Only β’ @Netflix β’ @Anime
π₯581β€391β€βπ₯114π66β‘26π€24π€―21π20
Waiting for the Death Note remake? ππ₯ Do you think it could happen? π€ π Subscribe: @Only β’ @Netflix β’ @Anime
β€453π148π101π₯43π12π12π11π€―11
β‘οΈ Jujutsu Kaisen - Season 3 7 days left β (08.01.2026) Can`t wait? π₯ π Subscribe: @Only β’ @Netflix β’ @Anime
β€716π₯201β€βπ₯106π80π€―30π29π24β‘21
πͺ Chainsaw Man - Season 2 Poster π’ Release date: 2026-2027 Hyped? π₯ π Subscribe: @Only β’ @Netflix β’ @Anime
π₯377β€344π73β€βπ₯46π€¬29π12π³11π10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @boruto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
βοΈ Best @anime battle:
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2025 to 13 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 664,479 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@boruto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ₯ ANIME πΏβ (@boruto), 305,475 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boruto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.