Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

πŸ’‹πŸ’¦ π—’π—‘π—Ÿπ—¬ πŸ”ž

@only

4 usernames

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

121,750subscribers

+2,562 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001128913307
TypeChannel
Usernames@habibi @loves @only @stick
DescriptionBuy Ads / Partnership πŸ‘‰ @cost All content complies with Telegram's Terms of Service βœ… ⚠️ @ONLY channel hosts paid promotions. We do not manage, endorse, or represent any featured creator.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/only

Topic

Adult β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

119,188121,750120,4696 August 2026 β€” 119,188 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 119,188 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 119,225 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 119,232 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 119,236 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 119,407 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 119,553 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 119,565 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 119,619 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 119,820 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 119,893 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 119,916 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 120,042 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 120,128 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 120,301 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 120,327 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 120,377 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 120,491 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 120,675 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 120,680 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 120,890 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 120,974 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 121,201 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 121,207 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 121,319 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 121,371 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 121,624 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 121,633 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 121,678 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 121,750 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
30 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2,562. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118,804–122,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:36121,750+72
12 Aug 2026, 07:42121,678+45
12 Aug 2026, 04:37121,633+9
12 Aug 2026, 04:12121,624+253
11 Aug 2026, 15:23121,371+52
11 Aug 2026, 10:43121,319+112
11 Aug 2026, 01:14121,207+6
11 Aug 2026, 01:07121,201+227
10 Aug 2026, 14:41120,974+84
10 Aug 2026, 09:33120,890+210
10 Aug 2026, 02:01120,680+5
10 Aug 2026, 01:26120,675+184
9 Aug 2026, 17:02120,491+114
9 Aug 2026, 09:11120,377+50
9 Aug 2026, 04:12120,327+26
9 Aug 2026, 02:51120,301+173
8 Aug 2026, 18:00120,128+86
8 Aug 2026, 09:59120,042+126
8 Aug 2026, 02:04119,916+23
8 Aug 2026, 00:44119,893first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
260.9%
avg views Γ· 121,750 subscribers
Avg views / post
318,000
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.127%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total1,906,000
Reactions total2,429
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
52
Videos
45
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

8,021 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀4,67358.3%
πŸ”₯1,29116.1%
πŸ’‹6468.05%
❀‍πŸ”₯4826.01%
πŸ‘4775.95%
πŸ“1722.14%
😍1121.40%
😈871.08%
πŸ’”811.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 8,021reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTCβ‰ˆ197,000 views396 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Message me now! I`m online πŸ’• πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @CuteLanaKitten

❀214πŸ”₯71πŸ’‹41πŸ‘27❀‍πŸ”₯24😈10πŸ“9

4 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTCβ‰ˆ194,000 views334 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Wanna chat with me? I`m online 🫦 πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @LunaViceOfficial

❀171πŸ”₯45❀‍πŸ”₯35πŸ’‹35πŸ‘34😈12😍2

27 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTCβ‰ˆ351,000 views535 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

I`m online, come chat πŸ’‹ πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @ElenaMommyOfficial

❀303πŸ”₯69πŸ‘42😍35πŸ’‹34❀‍πŸ”₯21πŸ“16😈15

23 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTCβ‰ˆ395,000 views497 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

πŸ™πŸ₯° Papi, message me and you would have a chance to dance with me πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @SofiaCalienteOfficial

❀270πŸ”₯98πŸ’‹41❀‍πŸ”₯36πŸ‘26πŸ“20😍6

22 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTCβ‰ˆ379,000 views272 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

I have something to show you… πŸ’‹ πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @QueenKiraDom

❀179πŸ”₯33πŸ’‹15πŸ‘14πŸ’”14😍10πŸ“7

20 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTCβ‰ˆ390,000 views395 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Wanna help me dress? πŸ’‹ Talk to me πŸ‘‰ @FitnessGoddessRoxy

❀243πŸ”₯49πŸ’‹39❀‍πŸ”₯29πŸ‘29πŸ“3😍3

12 Jul 2026, 07:21 UTCβ‰ˆ526,000 views493 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Wanna chat, boys? πŸ₯΅ πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @CuteLanaKitten

❀316πŸ”₯73πŸ’‹46❀‍πŸ”₯29πŸ‘28πŸ“1

11 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTCβ‰ˆ466,000 views393 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Don’t just watch… come say hi 😈 πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @LunaViceOfficial

❀220πŸ”₯71πŸ’‹36❀‍πŸ”₯23πŸ‘23πŸ“20

9 Jul 2026, 04:04 UTCβ‰ˆ467,000 views363 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🫦 Message me and i will show you my little secret πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @ElenaMommyOfficial

❀214πŸ”₯49❀‍πŸ”₯31πŸ’‹25πŸ‘22😍13πŸ’”5πŸ“4

4 Jul 2026, 04:31 UTCβ‰ˆ507,000 views566 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Papi, wanna chat? I`m online πŸ₯΅ πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @SofiaCalienteOfficial

❀325πŸ”₯92πŸ’‹45❀‍πŸ”₯40πŸ‘35😈19πŸ’”10

2 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTCβ‰ˆ484,000 views343 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

I have something to show you… πŸ’‹ πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @QueenKiraDom

❀229πŸ”₯53πŸ‘22πŸ“21πŸ’‹15😍3

1 Jul 2026, 04:15 UTCβ‰ˆ463,000 views349 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Online and waiting for your message πŸ’ŒπŸ’• πŸ’¬ Chat πŸ‘‰ @FitnessGoddessRoxy

❀232πŸ”₯47πŸ’‹30πŸ‘24❀‍πŸ”₯16

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @only. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 158,816 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ’‹πŸ’¦ π—’π—‘π—Ÿπ—¬ πŸ”žβ€ (@only), 121,750 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/only.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.