Channel
@bonmeel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
460subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001303915930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bonmeel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bonmeel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 460 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:45 | 459 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 460 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 456 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 453 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 454 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 454 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
102 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 39.2% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 23.5% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 17.6% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 8.82% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 6.86% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 2.94% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bonmeel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пробники Bonmeel созданы для того, чтобы владельцы могли без лишних затрат понять, подходит ли рацион их питомцу. Универсального корма, который одинаково подходит всем животным, не существует, и это абсолютно нормально. Если пробник показал, что рацион не подошел именно вашему питомцу, значит, он выполнил свою задачу. Такая ситуация говорит об индивидуальных особенностях организма, а не о качестве корма. Bonmeel – …
❤7👏2🔥2
Производство Bonmeel: что стоит за каждой упаковкой корма? Показываем весь путь создания кормов Bonmeel от отбора ингредиентов и подготовки сырья до фасовки и упаковки готовой продукции. Производство находится в России, в д. Пагубино. Рекомендуем оформлять заказ на сайте Bonmeel. Сейчас это самый надежный и удобный способ: мы самостоятельно собираем каждый заказ, проверяем комплектацию и передаем его в доставку. В…
🔥8🥰5❤4👏2
Пожар на складе Wildberries в Рязани затронул и Bonmeel. Весь ассортимент Bonmeel, представленный на Wildberries, находился именно на этом складе. Поэтому сейчас продукция Bonmeel отсутствует на маркетплейсе. Но вы всегда можете оформить заказ напрямую на нашем сайте. В наличии – весь ассортимент кормов для собак и кошек. Выбирайте удобный способ доставки: СДЭК или Яндекс Доставка. Заказывая на нашем сайте, вы пол…
😢18❤3
Энтеропатия, аллергия и другие заболевания ЖКТ – как подобрать питание питомцу? «Я оцениваю корм не по наличию в нем мяса, а по тому, закрывает ли он потребности конкретного животного», – говорит ветеринарный врач-диетолог Елена Бреева. Bonmeel – пример такого подхода. Многие питомцы питаются этим полнорационным растительным кормом более пяти лет, находятся в ремиссии, а их клинические показатели остаются в норме. …
❤7🔥4🤩3👏1
Всё, что вы хотели знать о растительных рационах. В новом выпуске «Пёсьих матерей» ветеринарный гастроэнтеролог Алина Германская рассказала, как работают растительные корма, при каких диагнозах они могут быть эффективным инструментом и почему вокруг них до сих пор так много мифов. Выпуск вышел при поддержке Bonmeel. Слушайте на всех платформах. Сайт | Оформить заказ
❤3👏3🔥2
⭐️ Партнёр эпизода – полнорационный растительный корм Bonmeel. Врачи выбирают Bonmeel для пациентов с самыми разными диагнозами – от аллергии на животный белок до энтеропатии. Получите скидку 10% на первый заказ на сайте www.bonmeel.ru по промокоду DOGSMOTHERS. Действует до 31.12.26. Вокруг растительных кормов полно стереотипов, ветеринарный гастроэнтеролог Алина Германская помогла во всём разобраться. 🔵В чём разн…
❤7🔥5👍1👏1
Кому может быть полезен Bonmeel? 💙 питомцам с аллергией на животный белок 💙при чувствительном ЖКТ и проблемах с пищеварением 💙при кожных реакциях (зуд, дерматиты, высыпания) 💙как исключающая диета 💙тем, кто ищет полноценную растительную альтернативу Что по ассортименту? Для собак – зерновые, морские и беззерновые формулы, лакомства и твердый шампунь. Для кошек – отдельная линейка с учётом их физиологии. Почему это…
❤9🔥3🥰2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @bonmeel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bonmeel корма премиум класса” (@bonmeel), 460 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bonmeel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.