Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Богдан Ефремов

Channel

Богдан Ефремов

@bogdanmarketing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,959subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001301226736
TypeChannel
Username@bogdanmarketing
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bogdanmarketing

Growth

6,9596,9936,9767 August 2026 — 6,993 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,989 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,985 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,970 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,959 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,954–6,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:546,959-11
14 Aug 2026, 18:566,970-15
11 Aug 2026, 07:146,985-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:276,989-4
7 Aug 2026, 05:016,993first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 6,959 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (7 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total19,343
Reactions total538
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

846 reactions across 23 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁19823.4%
👍17921.2%
🔥15518.3%
13516.0%
💯10512.4%
😱273.19%
🥰263.07%
🤔151.77%
🗿50.591%
💔10.118%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 846reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bogdanmarketing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC475 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как у вас дела с маркетингом этим летом?

😁21👍13🔥51💯1🥰1

10 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC790 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Директ не обязан приносить вам дешёвые лиды Меня уже порядком задолбало слушать жалобы на дорогие лиды из Директа. Кто вообще решил, что человек, который прямо сейчас ищет ваш товар, сравнивает предложения и готов платить, должен обходиться бизнесу в 200 рублей? Увидел лид за 5 тысяч, и сразу начинается истерика: дорого, реклама не работает, директолог всё слил. Потом правда это же лид покупает на 100 тысяч, но вс

👍2113💯10🔥6😁2🤔1😱1

7 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,080 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«Гарантируем 100 лидов или вернём деньги» Очень заманчивое предложение, которое я часто вижу у коллег по рынку. Особенно если не уточнять, какими именно будут эти лиды. Обещали 100, реклама привела 60 нормальных. Где взять ещё 40? И вот тут у некоторых агентств внезапно появляется удивительная способность выполнять KPI: подключается дешёвый мусорный трафик, сомнительные площадки, боты и фрод. На бумаге все KPI вы

🔥10👍8💯5🤔32🥰2😁1😱1

6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,060 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Вы вообще верите кейсам агентств? С одной стороны, кейсы — это результаты работы. С другой… — кейсу уже может быть несколько лет и рынок за это время изменился; — специалист, который его сделал, уже давно не работает в компании; — или половину результата вообще сделала команда клиента. Отдельно веселят агентства с надписью «1000+ кейсов». Это вы настолько крутые? Или клиенты уходят так быстро, что приходится посто

😁14💯83🔥3🤔1🥰1😱1

5 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC978 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Под вчерашней статьей прилетел вот такой комментарий. И знаете что? Я даже соглашусь. Если вы продаете никому не нужный ширпотреб с околонулевой маржой и конкурируете только ценой — да, собственный сайт, скорее всего, вам не нужен. Но в статье речь вообще не про сайт, а про собственную систему продаж. Все любят считать стоимость разработки сайта, но почему-то забывают посчитать стоимость зависимости от единственн

👍14💯65🔥2🤔1🥰1😁1😱1

4 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,060 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как не прогореть вместе со складом Wildberries? Вчера я говорил о том, что самое опасное для предпринимателя — завязать весь бизнес на одной площадке. Судя по количеству заявок «где продавать, если не на WB?», тема попала в больное. Поэтому решил подробно ответить на этот вопрос в статье. Местами получилось жёстко, зато честно: разбираю зависимость от маркетплейсов и рассказываю, как построить собственную систему

👍4🔥43🥰2💯1😁1

4 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,150 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Одиноких россиянок старше 28 лет хотят освободить от работы по пятницам, чтобы у них было больше времени на уход за собой и личную жизнь — инициатива общественников. Уже предвкушаю последствия этой доброй и замечательной инициативы: — Здравствуйте, я на собеседование — Вы замужем? — Нет — Мы вам обязательно перезвоним!

😁40💯6😱6👍32🔥2💔1🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈1,160 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Твой бизнес умрёт, если не диверсифицировать риски Это азы предпринимательства, которые многие собственники почему-то пропускают мимо ушей. У огромного количества компаний весь трафик и продажи держатся на одном канале. Вместо того чтобы строить систему, собственник находит одну площадку, которая приносит деньги, вцепляется в неё обеими руками и надеется, что так будет всегда. Не будет. В 2026 году привлекать клие

👍10💯6🔥6😁51🤔1🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,260 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Полумеры в SEO обходятся дороже бездействия Смотрел «Титаник»? Помнишь, как Роза лежала на деревянном обломке, а Джек замерзал в воде? Примерно так же выглядит бизнес, который покупает SEO по низу рынка и надеется, что молодой неопытный специалист вытащит проект со дна. В SEO есть опасная иллюзия: чем дешевле подрядчик, тем меньше ты рискуешь. Только обычно всё заканчивается наоборот. SEO за 30–40 тысяч в месяц т

👍10💯7🔥4😁21😱1

30 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,230 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Рекламный бюджет сливается ещё до запуска. Нет, не из-за плохой стратегии или слабого специалиста. Рекламу всегда можно поправить, пересобрав объявления или сменив стратегию. Это лишь часть рабочего процесса. Гораздо хуже, когда начинает ломаться коммуникация внутри команды. Клиент подробно объясняет задачу на созвоне, все кивают — вроде бы всё зафиксировали. Но пока вводные проходят через несколько человек и вну

🔥9👍6💯4😱41🥰1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,350 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Автоматизация продаж с ИИ: что реально автоматизировать и с чего начать Компании часто заходят в автоматизацию с дорогих и эффектных инструментов вроде прогнозирования спроса и сложной аналитики. А заявки тем временем теряются на входе: например, клиент пишет ночью, а менеджер отвечает утром. Что разобрали в новой статье: — какие направления в продажах закрывает ИИ и какие дают результат быстрее всего — как ИИ ква

🔥73💯3👍2🤔1🥰1😁1

27 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,390 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«Требуется человек-оркестр» Примерно так сегодня выглядит половина вакансий в маркетинге. Кажется, это единственная сфера, где до сих пор искренне верят, что один человек может одинаково хорошо делать всё. - Настроить контекст? — Уже сделал. - SEO? — Вот стратегия. - Собрать ИИ-бота? — А разве это ещё кто-то не умеет? В попытке сэкономить компании ищут «универсальных солдат», а потом удивляются слитым бюджетам и

👍12😁87💯4🔥2🤔1🥰1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @bogdanmarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,026,437 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 175,795
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Богдан Ефремов” (@bogdanmarketing), 6,959 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bogdanmarketing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.