Channel
@blossomtime11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,724subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001596624696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blossomtime11 |
| Description | Blossomtime Telegram est la petite sœur de Blossomtime Odysee. Bienvenue🙏 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blossomtime11 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 8,724 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 8,732 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 8,732 | first reading |
188 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 132 of 188 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 188 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 130,903 |
| Reactions total | 2,754 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,754 reactions across 132 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 779 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 701 | 25.5% | |
| 🎉 | 377 | 13.7% | |
| 💊 | 315 | 11.4% | |
| 💯 | 227 | 8.24% | |
| 🏆 | 187 | 6.79% | |
| ⚡ | 91 | 3.30% | |
| 🆒 | 77 | 2.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 188 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,754reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 188 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Phil a republié une vidéo de lui le 4 novembre 2020. Il a parlé des élections de 2020. La légende de la vidéo, aujourd'hui, est la suivante : "le jour où tout a commencé". https://t.me/philgodlewskii4/2733 GM : "le jour où tout a commencé" 146 Président légitime 146 QD 146 "Croyez-vous aux coïncidences... ?" Phil confirme-t-il la continuité du gouvernement ? L'expression "les fesses de ma sœur" a été prononcée…
Photo, posted without a caption
Les États-Unis exercent un contrôle total sur le détroit d'Ormuz. JE CROIS QUE NOUS ALLONS LE CONSERVER ! Notre blocus naval est qualifié, par tous, de « MUR D'ACIER », et il n'y a rien que l'Iran puisse faire à ce sujet. Ils n'ont pas de marine, ils n'ont pas de force aérienne, leurs soldats restants ne sont pas payés, les Gardiens de la révolution islamique sont décimés et en fuite, et leur « direction » est, au mi…
RESTRUCTURATION FINANCIÈRE MONDIALE ET SAISIE D'ACTIFS EN COURS, À LA SUITE DES RÉVÉLATIONS RÉCENTES D'UN TRIBUNAL. • DES MESURES ÉCONOMIQUES D'URGENCE ONT ÉTÉ ACTIVÉES POUR GELER LES ACTIFS LIÉS AUX SOCIÉTÉS ÉCRANS ET AUX COMPTES OFFSHORE MIS À DECOUVRE. LES CENTRES BANCAIRES SITUÉS EN SUISSE, À LONDRES ET À NEW YORK SONT SOUMIS À UN CONTRÔLE DIRECT, LES AUTORITÉS METTANT FIN À DES DÉCENNIES DE FINANCEMENT ILLICITE…
💊2
ACTU VOYANCE https://youtu.be/hR_iofaeozs
👏1
Le président Trump, lorsqu'on lui a demandé s'il envisageait réellement de se présenter à la réélection : « La loi est très claire à ce sujet... » Quelle loi ? Qui a rédigé cette loi ? Que dit réellement la Constitution ? Cela sera l'une des plus grandes "révélations" pour le public 🫡 WAR CORRESPONDENT
🏆13👏5🔥2💊1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥4
November 4th, 2020 ☝️ The day it all began.
URGENT : Après être monté publiquement à bord de l'Air Force One en Turquie, le président Trump a été DISCRÈTEMENT déplacé, hors de vue de la presse, vers un avion C-32A à proximité, qu'il a utilisé pour se rendre au Royaume-Uni, alors qu'un possible complot d'assassinat impliquant l'Iran était en cours – Washington Post. L'Air Force One habituel était un leurre. Cela s'est produit après qu'il ait initialement quitt…
💊18💯6🔥3
Video, posted without a caption
🚨 INCROYABLE ! Le Dr. Fauci dissimulait des données révélant un taux de fausse couche de PLUS DE 80 % chez les femmes enceintes ayant reçu les vaccins à ARNm contre la COVID-19 au cours de leur premier trimestre. Il s'agissait en fait d'un "coup" provoquant l'AVORTEMENT. C'est un MEURTRE. Selon des documents publiés aujourd'hui par @RandPaul et @SenRonJohnson, "les données brutes ont révélé un taux de 82 % de fauss…
🔥21
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 188 posts we hold for @blossomtime11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 116,356 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@blossomtime11 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blossomtime11” (@blossomtime11), 8,724 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blossomtime11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.