Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sara Hopps Channel

Channel

Sara Hopps Channel

@SaraHopps

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,960subscribers

-579 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002020287396
TypeChannel
Username@SaraHopps
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SaraHopps

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

19,000 average views per post against 36,960 subscribers — an engagement rate of 51.3%. Across the 3,701 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,625–99,965 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.72% and 10.9%, with a median of 5.01%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (1 September 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Posts measured142 of 143 published in the window (0 exact, 142 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,691,790
Mature posts only61.3% over 109 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers36,960 measured 28 September 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 3,701 channels · p10 0.409% · p25 1.72% · p50 5.01% · p75 10.9% · p90 21.4%
Position in cohort99.405th percentile · 10.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.084% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 1 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

36,85637,53937,197.56 August 2026 — 37,539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,538 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,525 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,501 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,485 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,464 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,454 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,445 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,427 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37,404 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,369 subscribers18 August 2026 — 37,362 subscribers19 August 2026 — 37,347 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,325 subscribers21 August 2026 — 37,297 subscribers23 August 2026 — 37,270 subscribers24 August 2026 — 37,231 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,216 subscribers26 August 2026 — 37,205 subscribers27 August 2026 — 37,194 subscribers28 August 2026 — 37,178 subscribers29 August 2026 — 37,171 subscribers30 August 2026 — 37,165 subscribers31 August 2026 — 37,149 subscribers1 September 2026 — 37,131 subscribers2 September 2026 — 37,121 subscribers4 September 2026 — 37,100 subscribers6 September 2026 — 37,028 subscribers10 September 2026 — 36,979 subscribers12 September 2026 — 36,931 subscribers14 September 2026 — 36,894 subscribers15 September 2026 — 36,856 subscribers17 September 2026 — 37,064 subscribers28 September 2026 — 36,960 subscribers36,9606 August 202628 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 53 days, net -579. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,754–37,641 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 07:3536,960-104
17 Sept 2026, 19:3737,064+208
15 Sept 2026, 17:1836,856-38
14 Sept 2026, 00:4136,894-37
12 Sept 2026, 08:5836,931-48
10 Sept 2026, 02:1836,979-49
6 Sept 2026, 15:5737,028-72
4 Sept 2026, 02:3837,100-21
2 Sept 2026, 13:4437,121-10
1 Sept 2026, 12:5337,131-18
31 Aug 2026, 13:5337,149-16
30 Aug 2026, 15:4437,165-6
29 Aug 2026, 16:2537,171-7
28 Aug 2026, 19:2637,178-16
27 Aug 2026, 17:3637,194-11
26 Aug 2026, 18:0337,205-11
25 Aug 2026, 18:2737,216-15
24 Aug 2026, 21:2737,231-39
23 Aug 2026, 07:0437,270-27
21 Aug 2026, 16:0837,297first reading

Engagement

182 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.3%
avg views ÷ 36,960 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,000
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
143
of 182 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held182 (24 July 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total2,691,790
Reactions total61,579
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Oct 2026, 16:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,600
Videos
≈1,690
Links
≈2,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 33m
Average length
2m 45s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

86,978 reactions across 181 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24,03427.6%
🔥16,53119.0%
👀8,73610.0%
💯7,3798.48%
🙏7,3608.46%
👍6,8917.92%
❤‍🔥3,2453.73%
😁3,2073.69%
👏3,1423.61%
😎1,8722.15%
🫡7330.843%
🥰6400.736%
🤩6290.723%
⚡5850.673%
🤯5300.609%
🎉3960.455%
👌3610.415%
😱3300.379%
🏆2080.239%
🍾490.056%
10 further kinds1200.138%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 181 of the 182 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86,978 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 02:32 UTC≈8,650 views269 reactionsread 1 October 2026

GAME ON! 😎

🔥227⚡24🤩10❤‍🔥6🫡2

1 Oct 2026, 02:32 UTC≈6,230 views280 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @STR1KER17Photo

L👀K at those signatures CAREFULLY... They're ALL IN on it. 😎 🇺🇸🤘🐺🤘🇺🇸 SOURCEFILE: https://x.com/STR1KER17X/status/2105365685211709619?s=20

🔥174👀67❤20😁12👌5🫡2

30 Sept 2026, 20:57 UTC≈4,010 views461 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @real_donaldjtrump

Today, I am pleased to announce, that the last American Forces are leaving Iraq! It has been a long time, with very bad decision-making that got us involved in this quagmire in the first place, but soon, that will be part of History. This is a Great Day for America and, importantly, we leave with Iraq having a wonderful new Prime Minister, Ali al-Zaidi, somebody I supported from the beginning and fully endorsed. He w…

🔥243❤133🙏45👏20🫡12👍5🤩2🥰1

30 Sept 2026, 20:57 UTC≈4,110 views266 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @philgodlewskii4Photo

Told you he didn’t do it 💯

❤123💯74🔥31👍17😱10🫡7👌4

29 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC≈11,000 views561 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says a new "Super Intelligence Czar" will be named soon. @WatcherGuru

🔥278👀179👍46🙏24❤19😎8🫡4🤩3

29 Sept 2026, 19:31 UTC≈5,000 views316 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @philgodlewskii4Video

2026 PPSA ☝️

❤177⚡53🎉23😎20😁14👀8😱8👌5

29 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC≈11,200 views510 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Hey Sara, Just thought I would point something out…. You mentioned “Batter up”. Bats are referenced in what month and holiday? October which has Halloween bats 🦇 Will there be tricks and treats in October?

🔥283🙏111😎66👍27❤15😁6👀1🤩1

29 Sept 2026, 18:34 UTC≈11,500 views481 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Remember Phil did a LIVE called “BATTER UP” back on 10/7/2022. Nelly has a song called “Batter Up (extract)” QDrop 101 says: PHIL_B_0_Extract_Conf EXTRACT…👀 What does batter up mean? Batter Up comes from baseball; it means “YOUR TURN” to the next batter to swing because it’s now your turn. It’s sometimes used to say “GET READY” in slang especially in places where baseball is popular. “YOUR TURN” in GM = 152 “B…

🔥276👀72❤66🙏49🫡5😁5🤯4🤩2

29 Sept 2026, 18:29 UTC≈10,800 views450 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Is Phil pointing us to QDROP 101?! 👀 Phil made sure to title the video “White Snake”—but what if there’s another reason? “Here I Go Again” = 99 in gematria. “White Snake” is two words. 99 + 2 = 101. Remember what Phil has told us: if he can’t come out and tell us directly, he’ll find a way to show us. 🤷‍♀️👀😎

❤211🔥91💯66👀41👍13👏12😁7🫡5

29 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC≈12,100 views332 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Phil’s song… HERE I GO AGAIN (99) THE EVENT (99) ASCENSION (99)

❤201🔥51👍41🙏31🫡5🤩2😁1

29 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC≈4,520 views223 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @philgodlewskii4Video

White snake 🐍

❤130🔥61🙏14👌7🫡5😁4🤩2

29 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC≈4,960 views303 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @philgodlewskii4Video

Phil EDU lesson of the day ☝️

❤146😁94🔥20👏11😎11👀7✍5🤩5

Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @SaraHopps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tarot By Janine Channel
@TarotByJanineChannel · 54,943
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
FCB PULSE NEWS & Q DECODES
@FCBPODCAST · 23,488
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 20 September 2026
Wrath of God
@soulsurvivalcommunity · 23,372
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 18 September 2026
TRUTH Social
@TRUTHSociaIQ · 40,930
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 September 2026
Patriot Streetfighter
@patriotstreetfighter · 71,576
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
And We Know®
@andweknowLT · 85,812
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
loop_rm_3117211
@looP_rM_3117211 · 291
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 17 August 2026
Melissa Redpill - Freedom Force Battalion 🇺🇸
@freedomforcebattalion · 76,965
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
Mike Pompeo
@MichaelRPompeo · 24,669
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
DavidNinoRodriguez
@ninoscorner · 79,518
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
TRUTH PUPS
@TruthPups · 21,356
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 September 2026
The Donald
@TheDonaldUS · 22,260
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sara Hopps Channel” (@SaraHopps), 36,960 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaraHopps.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.