Video, posted without a caption

Channel
COVID FILES France
@covidfilesfrance
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,610subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002042139778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @covidfilesfrance |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/covidfilesfrance |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 1,610 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 1,613 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 1,614 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 1,616 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 1,618 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 1,622 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 1,622 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 27m 23s
- Average length
- 5m 29s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
217 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 103 | 47.5% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 22.1% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 16.6% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 3.69% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 3.23% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 2.30% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 2.30% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.922% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.461% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.461% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.461% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 217 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Le propre conseiller de Biden, chargé de la lutte contre le COVID, affirme désormais que le virus est issu d'un laboratoire... 🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸 MIDNIGHT RIDERS TRUTH CHANNEL
🖕2🤡2
En direct sur CNN, le ministre américain de la Santé Robert Kennedy Jr vient d’exploser une journaliste : « Vous parlez comme un perroquet ! Vous répétez comme un perroquet ce que des « experts » vous disent alors qu’il a été démontré pendant le covid que ces « experts » avaient menti sur TOUT ! Les masques, la distanciation sociale, l’immunité naturelle, les vaccins, l’origine du covid, etc. TOUT ! » En face : u…
❤18👏9🎉2🤮1
Lors de son passage devant le Congrès américain, Anthony Fauci a fait valoir son droit au silence en invoquant le 5ᵉ amendement tout au long de son interrogatoire, refusant de s'expliquer sur ses propos tenus durant la période Covid. Mais le silence au Congrès ne suffit plus à tout masquer : grâce au sénateur Rand Paul, son carnet intime de 465 pages a été rendu public. Sur l'ensemble de ces documents, j'ai sélectio…
❤4👏3🔥1
L'ancien chef de l'agence de renseignement étrangère du Royaume-Uni, le MI6, a informé Boris Johnson au début de 2020 que le virus COVID s'était échappé du laboratoire de Wuhan. Signification : les gouvernements des États-Unis, du Royaume-Uni, de la Chine communiste et de l'Allemagne connaissaient tous la vérité, l'ont couverte et ont simultanément mené l'une des plus grandes campagnes de désinformation et de censur…
🔥4
🔥🔥 31st of July 2026, important update. Developments regarding covid, vaccine and Government related crimes. 🔥🔥 Terrorism act https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/section/1 https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/francis_boyle_affidavit.pdf The Metropolitan Police Professional Standards Directorate. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) were consulted and they have directed The Met’s PSD to carry out the…
👍1
La Maison blanche a publié son rapport sur l'origine du Covid (il me semble d'ailleurs qu'il avait déjà été publié antérieurement). "Lab Leak".. c'est le titre du rapport, daté du 4/12/2024 (mais la date de la publication en ligne est antérieure... environ avril 2025 si on en croit archive.org : https://web.archive.org/web/20250418135523/https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/). Bref donc, il e…
👍9❤1
« La "performance" de Fauci aujourd'hui m'a rendue malade. Arrogance satisfaite. Zéro remords. Zéro responsabilité. Il a refusé de répondre à une seule question. Je partage cela à nouveau comme rappel : il a utilisé vos impôts pour financer la recherche sur le coronavirus dans le laboratoire de Wuhan et a travaillé avec la communauté du renseignement pour couvrir l'affaire. Nous méritons la vérité et la responsabilit…
👍13
Et le résumé vidéo
Donc voici, publié par le sénator Rand PAUL, l'intégralité (1141 pages) du journal intime du Mengele des temps modernes.. https://www.paul.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026.07.24_Tonys-Diary-Package.pdf Si vous avez déjà lu le livre de RFK Jr sur l'individu, vous savez de quel monstre il s'agit. Pour me faire déjà une petite idée de ce qu'il s'avouait à lui-même pendant qu'il jouait les héros de la vaccin…
❤9👍5🙏1
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @covidfilesfrance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@theirEndIsNear · 3,9496 postsBlossomtime11
@blossomtime11 · 8,6714 postsActu Intel - Info US et Internationale en Français
@actuintel · 6,2342 posts⚖️ - Maître X - OFFICIEL - ⚖️
@maitreXOFFICIEL · 11,9082 postsJocelyne P. Traduction
@JocelynePTraduction · 8,1821 postCRIME CHANNEL 6029679/21 & 01/62447/24
@crimechannelcovidoptalla · 8,4621 postÉpiQlivE
@epiQlive · 1,8781 postLa Nouvelle France 🇫🇷
@la_nouvelle_france · 24,6551 postMyl traductions🌼
@myl_traductions · 6,8741 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COVID FILES France” (@covidfilesfrance), 1,610 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/covidfilesfrance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.