Channel
@blocul_victoriei
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
927subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002264385239 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blocul_victoriei |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blocul_victoriei |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @blocul_victoriei/10890 · this entry19 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC | @victorie_blocul/1537319 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @blocul_victoriei/10891 · this entry20 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC | @victorie_blocul/1537420 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @victorie_blocul | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (10–7) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @blocul_victoriei — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 927 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 933 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 933 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,387 |
| Reactions total | 74 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
74 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 56.8% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 20.3% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 8.11% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 6.76% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Astăzi își sărbătorește ziua de naștere prietenul și colegul nostru de echipă, Iuri Vitneanschi! Sinceritatea, deschiderea, energia inepuizabilă și capacitatea de a uni oamenii sunt calitățile pentru care Iuri este apreciat de prieteni, colegi și oameni cu aceleași convingeri. El rămâne mereu fidel principiilor sale și nu se teme să-și asume responsabilitatea chiar și în cele mai dificile momente. Îi dorim lui Iuri…
❤1🔥1
Astăzi își sărbătorește ziua de naștere Valerian Fiodorovici Cristea, un om de stat cu o vastă experiență, o personalitate remarcabilă care și-a dedicat mulți ani în slujba țării. De-a lungul carierei sale, a activat în Parlament, în Guvern și în serviciul diplomatic. La fiecare etapă, Valerian Fiodorovici a dat dovadă de profesionalism, responsabilitate și respect față de oameni. Pentru mulți, el a fost nu doar un …
❤6
❗️❗️❗️❗️Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului a înregistrat zeci de cereri depuse de cetățenii noștri în cauze ce vizează urmărirea administrativă motivată politic, amenzile nejustificate și acuzațiile privind așa-numita corupere electorală. Cererile au fost înregistrate oficial și acceptate pentru continuarea procedurii de examinare. Echipa noastră oferă cetățenilor asistența juridică necesară. Pentru mulți, CEDO…
👍4
Astăzi, camaradul nostru Veaceslav Jucov își sărbătorește frumosul jubileu de 30 de ani. Atitudinea responsabilă față de orice activitate îl caracterizează pe Veaceslav mai bine decât orice cuvinte. Implicarea sa activă în viața publică, dăruirea, spiritul civic și patriotismul autentic i-au adus respectul colegilor și aprecierea multor cetățeni ai țării. Îi dorim sărbătoritului multă sănătate, fericire, împliniri …
❤10❤🔥1🔥1
Astăzi se împlinesc 32 de ani de la adoptarea Constituției Republicii Moldova. În ultimii ani, guvernarea a transformat Legea Supremă dintr-o garanție a drepturilor cetățenilor într-un instrument pentru atingerea propriilor scopuri politice. Instituțiile independente sunt distruse, instanțele — folosite împotriva opoziției, drepturile cetățenilor — limitate, iar legislația este rescrisă pentru a servi intereselor PA…
👍4
Astăzi este ziua de naștere a Tatianei Cociu, reprezentantă a blocului „Victorie”, fost primar al orașului Orhei. Tatiana — un exemplu de conducător de succes, un adevărat patriot, un coleg de încredere și un prieten foarte bun. Deschiderea ei și dorința sinceră de a lucra în beneficiul locuitorilor au lăsat o amprentă vizibilă în dezvoltarea Orheiului. Îi dorim Tatianei multă sănătate, fericire și bunăstare, energ…
❤6
Blocul „Victorie” nu recunoaște decizia pronunțată astăzi de Curtea de Apel privind dizolvarea partidelor „Șansă”, FASM, „Renaștere” și „Victorie”. Hotărârea va fi contestată la Curtea Supremă de Justiție, iar, dacă va fi necesar, și la Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului, precum și în alte instanțe internaționale. Decizia este nedreaptă nu doar prin conținutul său, ci și prin fundamentul juridic pe care se bazeaz…
👍7
❗️Витнянский о решении Апела: Политическое решение. Санду боится всех: оппозицию, свободных СМИ и собственного народа “Сегодня в Молдове диктатура, когда один боится всех. Нынешняя власть и Майя Санду является той единицей, которая сегодня боится всех: боится оппозицию, боится свободных СМИ и собственного народа. Это решение суда подписано диктаторской росписью. Партия власти ликвидирует оппозицию. И это - никак не…
❗️Алексей Лунгу о решении Апела: Это национальный позор! “Это великий национальный позор! После падения режима ПДС, на стенах Апелляционной палаты Кишинева большими буквами будут написаны имена судей, которые принимали незаконные и преступные решения. Эти решения не против меня, “Шанса” или других партий, а против всего народа! Наша борьба здесь не заканчивается. Мы пойдем в ВСП и дойдем до ЕСПЧ. Наша борьба будет …
‼️Адвокат Вадим Банару: Политическая диктатура, которая проникла во все сферы общественной жизни "Очень сложно комментировать это с юридической точки зрения, когда мы фактически имеем дело с тем, что Министерство юстиции полностью контролирует ситуацию. Это политическая диктатура, которая проникла во все сферы общественной жизни. Разумеется, мы будем обжаловать все эти решения. Как я уже говорил, мы не были настрое…
‼️‼️Корреспондент Первого канала передает, что Алексея Лунгу в зале суда оштрафовали на 50 у.е. Судье не понравилось, что он возмущен решением Апелляционной палаты
😡1
Апелляционная палата постановила распустить партию “Шанс”. “Так расстреляйте нас всех уже! Исполняйте, чего вы ждете? Это позор!”, - прокомментировал решение суда лидер партии “Шанс” Алексей Лунгу. Также на 6 месяцев была ограничена деятельность партий “Возрождение” и FASM. Sputnik Молдова ¦ Telegram ¦ Сайт ¦ VK ¦ OK ¦ Rutube ¦ Дзен ¦ MAX
😡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @blocul_victoriei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 50,340 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blocul Politic „Victorie“ Политический блок «Победа»” (@blocul_victoriei), 927 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blocul_victoriei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.