Channel
@bjdjsn233
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
362subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001911529618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bjdjsn233 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bjdjsn233 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 362 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 363 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 363 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 364 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2025 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤔第一次配合是不是越便宜越好？ 👉很多人第一次都會說 「先便宜試試看，好再升級」 這很正常 但關鍵點不能忘: 試水溫=是為了找到滿意的 不是省錢而是錢能花的值得 不同類型＝不同價格＝你要選適合的 所以剛開始會問你:喜歡什麼類型？預算多少？有沒有雷點？不是要你多花,而是是想讓每次配合錢都花的值得,不浪費任何一分. 便宜不代表不好,但不要為了差一點預算,選一個 差一點感覺的,我會用最專業的角度,幫你挑你預算裡最值得的. 第一次配合,是你認識我們素質的開始,而我會讓你結束後講出那句:這才是我要的 花出的時間、金錢、信任,只會值得,不會浪費 而吖吖家一直秉持的基準也是:配合是長久的,而錢就該花在對的人身上 ♾每次都想先試水 但反而每次體驗都不開心 加起來的錢早就可以約一個自己很喜歡很滿意的了 那為什麼不嘗試信任吖吖的專業‼️ 🌐私訊點擊： @yayatg2580 ⭐Gleezy匿名約會：yaya25 📱line：yx…
新手喝茶教學｜第一次喝茶就上手！ （安全無壓力，見面滿意再付款 ✅） 很多大大第一次喝茶，都會有點緊張、不知道怎麼開始 別擔心～吖吖這邊幫你整理一份完整流程 讓你第一次也能喝得舒服、安心又盡興 ♾什麼是喝茶？ 簡單來說，就是安排一對一認識女生、親密互動的私下約會 雙方都自願、單純放鬆，沒有複雜關係，只求開心舒服～ ✔️✔️新手喝茶流程教學 ➡️ Step 1｜私訊茶姐說明需求 告訴我你的喜好類型（學生妹/清純/辣妹/輕熟/健談…） 也請說明：時間 + 地點 + 預算，我會幫你安排適合的妹妹 ❤️ ➡️ Step 2｜看妹妹介紹 → 選擇想見的對象 我會提供目前可配合的妹妹資訊（風格/年齡/特色）給你挑選 選好後，安排下單時段與建議地點 ✅ 完全自由選擇，不強迫、不硬塞 ➡️ Step 3｜你先開好房 → 提供房號，我們再安排出發 為了保護雙方隱私與安全，確認房號後妹妹才會出發 確保你真的在現場、也準備好了，不用擔…
📸 關於照片 我們安排的妹妹們，都是台灣本地短期兼職的女生，平常也有自己的生活與工作。有些照片是「相似參考照」，有些是「本人實拍」。寶貝們只要私訊我，我都會說明清楚，誠實不話術。 💰 關於價位 依地區不同，價位會有所差異： 🔹北部：$4,500 起跳 🔹中/南部：$3,000 起跳 也有 $4,000 / $5,000 / $6,000 / $7,000 / $8,000 / $9,000 / $10,000～甚至到 $20,000、$50,000、$100,000 等等，價格上不封頂。 ⏰ 關於節數 如果寶貝見到妹妹後很喜歡，現場想加節不一定能加成功，因為妹妹可能後面有其他安排。 為了避免當下喜歡卻無法加節、掃了興，建議寶貝們： 一開始就多預約一點時間，先保留時段，見面後再決定，彈性安排、給你最好的體驗~ 吖吖始終相信： 適合最重要，無論平價或高檔，我都用心安排。 台灣外送最佳選擇❤️見面滿意現金交易 🌐私訊點擊： …
🌟【高素質，從來不只是外表的華麗】🌟 在這個看臉的時代，我們常常被外表所迷惑，以為「高素質」只是一張精緻的臉蛋或完美的身材。但其實，真正的素質，是更深層次、更立體的存在。💎 今天，我們要聊聊那些「內在外在同樣出色」的妹妹們。她們不僅擁有令人羨慕的外表，更在某一領域有著非凡的成就與高度。🚀 比如，她可能是個碩士生，學業有成，知識淵博；也可能是某個行業的精英，事業風生水起；或者她是某項藝術的追尋者，在音樂、繪畫或舞蹈中閃耀著獨特的光芒。🎓🎨🎶 這樣的姐姐，不僅能帶給你視覺上的享受，更能在精神上與你產生共鳴。與她相處，你會發現她的談吐優雅、思維敏捷，每一句話都充滿智慧與深度。💬 高素質，從來不是單純的外在條件，而是一種綜合的魅力。它體現在她的學識、修養、品味，甚至是她對生活的態度。✨ 所以，當你遇到這樣的妹妹時，請不要只看到她的外表，而是去感受她內心的豐富與獨特。因為真正的素質，是能讓人在任何場合都能感受到她的自信、氣場與…
Video, posted without a caption
🪽 端午連假不送區域 🪽 連假期間 5/29 18:00 ~6/1 22:00 台中🔣五點之後 沙鹿~豐原 連假三天不送 高雄🔣楠梓區~鳳山區~小港區不送 台南🔣永康~仁德不送 新竹🔣竹北不送 南投🔣不送
用 gleezy 匿名資訊的不要一直劃掉或者刷新掉 不然我回了信息 或者你再打開會收不到信息的 記得咨詢的時候加一下主畫面 這樣就會在手機上主畫面上更方便查看以及回復
⚠️ 最近出現的新型盜號方式 照片中的視頻 照片 文檔 千萬不要去點擊 都是盜賬號的病毒喔 ‼️
喜歡玩多節的寶寶 可以在預約的時候 就跟吖確定好節數喔 有的妹妹是你預約一節 那妹妹就空出一節的時間 那你見到妹妹喜歡想要加 妹妹沒時間 後面也就沒辦法再加時間了喔
無言.....
突然發現一個問題 你們是不是不知道怎麼密我？？ 👇這個是賴 👇這個直接密我tg喔 📱LINE：y515785 📱TG:@yayatg2580
❤1👍1
🧜🏻♀️外約知識及防詐騙守則 pinned «蘋果手機看不見頻道群組資訊點開鏈接解鎖： https://reurl.cc/Zn0pmg»
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bjdjsn233. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bjdjsn233 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧜🏻♀️外約知識及防詐騙守則” (@bjdjsn233), 362 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bjdjsn233.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.