Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 精選清純學妹🍵 專區

Channel

精選清純學妹🍵 專區

@heh4570

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,594subscribers

+432 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002465223302
TypeChannel
Username@heh4570
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/heh4570

Growth

1,1621,5941,3787 August 2026 — 1,162 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,171 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,171 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,293 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,417 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,504 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,594 subscribers7 August 202619 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 12 days, net +432. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,097–1,659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 15:571,594+90
16 Aug 2026, 19:431,504+87
13 Aug 2026, 04:031,417+124
10 Aug 2026, 12:111,293+122
7 Aug 2026, 23:331,171no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:211,171+9
7 Aug 2026, 16:191,162first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 1,594 subscribers
Avg views / post
305
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.402%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (30 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,053
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰990.0%
110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC268 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇼在校女大生 #嬌小可愛型 棉棉➡️157m・45kg・C奶・19歲 青春肉體就是讚,膚白嫩滑好摸 想玩服裝玩具記得帶,妹妹很願意配合 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐gleezy預約:Xiaon52 🌐預約點擊: @xxn529 👍官網:www.kz258.com

🥰1

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

4 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC291 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇼短兼高中生 #嬌小可愛型 小糕➡️154m・43kg・C奶・19歲 超敏感妹妹,被一碰就全身發熱 小穴出水,深喉、浴室愛愛快來解鎖 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐gleezy預約:Xiaon52 🌐預約點擊: @xxn529 👍官網:www.kz258.com

🥰2

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

4 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC339 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇼短兼高中生 #嬌小可愛型 朵朵➡️160m・45kg・C奶・19歲 清純可愛學生妹妹又很有反差 穴穴超粉 可以配合哥哥變裝和玩具呦 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐gleezy預約:Xiaon52 🌐預約點擊: @xxn529 👍官網:www.kz258.com

🥰1

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

3 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC291 viewsread 7 August 2026

小暖口碑品質茶坊🍵全頻道導航總覽 🇹🇼正妹篩選專區:@xiaon5 新手專區:@yyua520 精選學生專區:@heh4570 成熟女人專區:@yunwei66 北部班表:@beik529 中部班表:@jkmgh63 南部班表:@nankj52 高檔🎀 紅牌vip茶:@vv89ip 🐰小暖の碎碎唸【需審核】 https://t.me/+jUZmR2zqyxU2YjA1 為了讓大家更方便查看不同內容 已整理好各專區頻道 依需求點擊直接加入即可!

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

3 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC276 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇼大學顏值校花 #清純係 初雪➡️162m・45kg・C奶・20歲 剛兼職小穴粉嫩緊實 水多又敏感 很會撒嬌 想要被哥哥慢慢帶著玩 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐gleezy預約:Xiaon52 🌐預約點擊: @xxn529 👍官網:www.kz258.com

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

1 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC181 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xiaon5

Posted without readable text

1

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

30 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC390 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇼JK制服學妹 #清純小隻馬 巧巧➡️156m・44kg・C奶・19歲 第一次兼職 很羞澀的可愛學妹 配合度極高哦 乳頭身體都很敏感 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐gleezy預約:Xiaon52 🌐預約點擊: @xxn529 👍官網:www.kz258.com

🥰2

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

30 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC365 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇼小隻馬清純係 #鄰家小妹 甜心➡️158m・45kg・C奶・19歲 皮膚白皙 服務貼心 甜美外型 可以喇舌69 小穴非常緊實多汁 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐gleezy預約:Xiaon52 🌐預約點擊: @xxn529 👍官網:www.kz258.com

🥰1

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

30 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC327 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇼剛成年的幼齒學生妹 心心➡️155m・42kg・B奶・18歲 皮膚白皙水嫩 乳頭很敏感 喜歡跟哥哥玩69 冰火 白虎一線鮑魚 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐gleezy預約:Xiaon52 🌐預約點擊: @xxn529 👍官網:www.kz258.com

🥰1

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

30 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC325 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇼清純學生 #馬尾蘿莉 許糖➡️158m・43kg・C奶・18歲 清純小隻馬學生 床上超黏人 嫩白皮膚 白虎小穴 多汁敏感 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐gleezy預約:Xiaon52 🌐預約點擊: @xxn529 👍官網:www.kz258.com

🥰1

Signed 小暖~🍵 營業中🐰

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @heh4570. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 38,186 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“精選清純學妹🍵 專區” (@heh4570), 1,594 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heh4570.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.