Channel
@ggii58
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,752subscribers
+114 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002077068808 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ggii58 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ggii58 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 5,752 | +77 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 5,675 | +30 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 5,645 | +16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 5,629 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 5,638 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 5,638 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,040 |
| Reactions total | 62 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 24 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 71.0% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 4.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ 暑假限定學生妹，名額有限 #北部 淡江大學 芮希 159.C.20y.45 — 黑系氣質 新店中學 小涵 158.D.18y.44 — 校園純欲 世新大學 宛宛 165.B.22y.48 — 高挑校花 #中部 中興大學 悅彤 160.C.22y.46 — 初戀臉孔 文華高中 芊語 155.B.18y.42 — 軟萌可人 逢甲大學 安綺 163.D.21y.47 — 撩人系 #南部 岡山高中 小蘋 150.C.18y.39 — 乖巧甜心 樹德大學 語彤 167.D.21y.49 — 火辣型 岡山高中 婕寧 157.B.22y.44 — 清純掛 🌐私訊點擊： @yayatg2580 ⭐Gleezy匿名約會：yaya25
❤1
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
每個人的感受都不同 ❤️ 真實分享，才是最有參考價值的 PS：如果是喜歡大奶性感的可以來密吖吖了解這位色妹妹喲~ 進門直接撲倒你🥰 🌐私訊點擊： @yayatg2580 ⭐Gleezy匿名約會：yaya25
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
很色的一個妹妹！恩客已經被榨乾惹~~
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
熟客朋友就是這麼給力！ 直接交給吖吖安排~ 讓你舒舒服服 結束後：很讚 這個妹妹加回約名單❤️ 信任吖吖妹妹素質會給你絕對的保障🍵 🌐私訊點擊： @yayatg2580 ⭐Gleezy匿名約會：yaya25
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
很多哥哥不知道加入賬號怎麼表達❓自己想要 這邊吖吖特別講解一下需要告知的點有哪些會更方便推薦哦✅ 填寫你的需求，更好的去篩選優質女生 喜歡類型： 大概預算： 希望服務： 禁止雷點： 預約時間： 所在地點： 以上 都是需要告知的 這樣我們才能更好的給你推薦你預算範圍內的妹妹哦 👍👍 🌐私訊點擊： @yayatg2580 ⭐Gleezy匿名約會：yaya25 ➡️本人高檔區：@vvip795
❤1
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
Posted without readable text
❤4🔥1
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
Posted without readable text
🥰3
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
Posted without readable text
👍2❤1
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
Posted without readable text
🥰3
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
🌐私訊點擊： @yayatg2580 ⭐Gleezy預約：yaya25
❤1
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
Posted without readable text
❤3👍1
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
熟悉的朋友~ 就是這麼給力！😘
Signed 專屬你的吖吖🍵 ~ლ
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @ggii58. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 167,015 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇹🇼吖吖精選高檔外送茶 ➡️TG:@yayatg2580” (@ggii58), 5,752 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ggii58.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.