Channel
@birnima_b
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
56subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001544164092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @birnima_b |
| Description | Xurshida Burxon qizi Journalist🩵 @b1bliophile_bot – oʻzim Kimdir... Nimadir... Qayerdadir...🤷🏻♀️🫀🌚 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/birnima_b |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 56 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 56 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 29 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
110 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 46.4% | |
| 💔 | 18 | 16.4% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 9.09% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 5.45% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 4.55% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.55% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.82% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.909% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.909% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.909% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2024 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#foydali Kovlamoq — yer, tuproq yoki boshqa qatlamni chuqurlashtirib qazish, ochish harakati sifatida izohlanadi. Masalan: yer kovlamoq, chuqur kovlamoq. Kavlamoq — biror narsaning yuzasini qirib, tirnab, ochishga harakat qilish ma’nosida keladi. Masalan: devorni kavlamoq, yerni kavlab qidirish.
🔥5❤1
Assalomu alaykum. Xayrli kech. Bu buyumni oʻzbek tilida nima degan boʻlardingiz?
jamiyatimizda oʻlim normaga aylandimi?! hamma mening sobiq universitetimdagi(buni tan olgim kelmaydi) galstuksiz darsga kiritilmagan talabani 2 kundan beri gapiradi. oʻtgan kuni(yoki undan oldin) 2004-yili tugʻilgan bir yigitni mashina urib ketib, oʻlgan. Yandex eltuvchisi(dostavshik) ekan. bu hodisani shunchalik kam odam gapirganki, uni bugun oʻrtogʻimning telefonida koʻrdim. qonga belangan kaattakon sumka, ruli…
💔10
Zamonaviy fikrlovchi yigitlarni koʻp koʻraman atrofda. Ular ayolni e'zozlashadi. Xotin ular uchun faqat bola tugʻib, uy ishlarini qiladigan ayol emas, balki alohida shaxs. Xotinim yaxshi kiyimlarni kiyishi, yaxshi taomlarni yeyishi, yaxshi sharoitda, shaharda yashashi, chet ellarga borishi, oʻzini rivojlantirishi, ogʻir ish qilmasligi kerak deb hisoblashadi. Bu yaxshi, ammo ayol deganda faqat xotini koʻz oldiga kelis…
💔8🤔2👎1
Dadam, onam, oymomam. Onam bolasini bolasiga qarayaptilar😁 Ota-ona shu-da oʻzi. Huuv 7-8 yoshimda istaklarim uchun qanday harakat qilishgan boʻlsa, hozir ham shu tashvishlarim ortidan yurishibdi. Jonlari omon boʻlsin🤲🙂
❤10👍4
– 4 yil oʻqib nima olding? – Shu qogʻozni. Bilim, tajriba, malaka, tilla ustozlar, qadrdon doʻstlar, sevimli ish, ogʻriqlar, anglashlar, ma'naviy oʻsish... va hokazo. Asil mohiyati ham shunda boʻlsa kerak oʻzi. Bugun diplomimni bakalavr dekanatidan olib, magistratura boʻlimiga topshirib keldim. Alloh yetkazganiga shukur. Oʻzi yoʻlingni ochib qoʻysayu, oʻqiyversang, oʻqiyversang, oʻqiyversang...
❤4😁2
Rakovina - suvchanoq
❤1🤣1
Yashashga ulguryapsilarmi dunyoning maishiy tashvishlaridan ortib😄 Oldinda kuuuuuz kelyapti🍂 Ulgʻayish ja yoqimlimas ekan. Qani haligi, bu dunyoda faqat kuz bor, azizim... she'rlariyu, 4 misra oʻqib ta'sirlanib oʻtirishlar. She'rdan uzoqlashibmiz. Kuz yaqinlashaversa garderobimni jigarranga boʻyashni boshlardim. Fasllar kayfiyatga ham ta'sir qiladiku. Lek hech ta'siri sezilmayapti-da. Goʻyoki 2 yildan buyon bitta f…
🔥1
Nima gapim boʻlsa onamga qoʻngʻiroq qilaman, ularga aytaman, hol-ahvolniyam ulardan soʻrayman dadamga nisbatan koʻproq. Ammo koʻnglimni ogʻritishsa, dadamni qattiq quchib yigʻlagim kelaveradi. Sogʻinib ketaveraman. Birga tushgan rasmimizga qarab yigʻlab oʻtiraman. Nega shunaqa?
❤2🔥1
Saqlangan xabarlarimdan saqlangan fikrlar topib oldim😍 • Pashshani qanotiga arzimaydigan hayotga nima qilaman siqilib. Baribir oʻlib ketamiz-ku. Ingliz tili ustozimiz Saida opa. • Biror yerga borishni xohlasang boʻldi, borasan. U qanday yoʻl bilan, qaysi usulda boʻlishidan qatʼiy nazar. Sobiq dekanimiz Akbar aka. • Odamlar yaxshilikka tez koʻnikib ketadi-da, yomonlik boʻlsa darrov musht koʻtararkan. Smm, Media biz…
❤4🌚1
Baxtni koʻz-koʻz qilsang koʻz tegadi.
❤8🔥3😁1
1937 yilning 31-dekabr kuni kech soat 11 larda esa Abdulla Qodiriyni uyidan olib chiqib ketishadi. Yangi yil kuni oilaviy norin yeb oʻtirishganda. Aynan suratdagi uydan. Rasmdagi zardevor ortida keyingi xonaga bogʻlab turgan eshik bor. U xona Qodiriyning onasiniki. Onam bilan oramiz uzoq boʻlmasin, ahvolidan xabar olib turaman deb oʻzlarini xonasidan onalarini xonasiga shunday eshik qoldirgan ekan. 📍 Abdulla Qodiriy…
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @birnima_b. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 908,488 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@birnima_b named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Birnima🌚” (@birnima_b), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/birnima_b.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.