【私聊】@xingwan8888 【艺名】 #星晚 【位置】 #上城 【课费】800P 1500PP 【分类】 #御姐 #舌吻 #69互舔 #共浴 #工兵认证 【备注】三个超级好评上榜,换新号
Signed 1:23(看看共群,谨防骗子)

Channel
@best_hz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
46,194subscribers
+1,181 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002029926530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @best_hz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/best_hz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 46,194 | +189 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 46,005 | +120 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 45,885 | +175 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 45,710 | +47 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:49 | 45,663 | +77 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 45,586 | +34 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 45,552 | +469 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 45,083 | +70 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 45,013 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 45,013 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 60 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (7 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 69,122 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 92.9% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【私聊】@xingwan8888 【艺名】 #星晚 【位置】 #上城 【课费】800P 1500PP 【分类】 #御姐 #舌吻 #69互舔 #共浴 #工兵认证 【备注】三个超级好评上榜,换新号
Signed 1:23(看看共群,谨防骗子)
【私聊】@paopaotang16 【艺名】 #泡泡糖 【位置】 #上城 【课费】700P 1300PP 【分类】 #嫩妹 #舌吻 #69互舔 #陪浴 #工兵中 【备注】 工兵优惠:剩3名 共3名500P/900PP,需出报告 报名联系:@yzsb123_bot 报名流程:群内发送“工兵”获取模板,提交报名表、150颜值以上截图以及过往报告发送至管理报名,无过往报告需300颜值。当日cj优先,管理回复确认,视为报名成功。
❤2
Signed 1:23(看看共群,谨防骗子)
【私聊】@yaxuan6636 【艺名】 #亚轩 【位置】 #拱墅 【课费】1000P 1800PP 【分类】 #御姐 #舌吻 #69互舔 #事后萧 #口爆 #共浴 #工兵认证 【备注】三个超级好评上榜
Signed 1:23(看看共群,谨防骗子)
【私聊】@nait886 【艺名】 #奶糖 【位置】 #萧山 【课费】800P 1500PP 【分类】 #嫩妹 #六九 #舌吻 #工兵认证 【备注】
Signed 1:23(看看共群,谨防骗子)
【私聊】@xnq0622 【艺名】 #馨馨 【位置】 #萧山 【课费】900p 1700PP 【分类】 #嫩妹 #舌吻 【备注】
Signed 小鹿 看共群,防骗子
【私聊】@wenrunr 【艺名】 #温软软 【位置】 #上城 【课费】1200P 2300PP 【分类】 #御姐 #舌吻 #69互舔 #深喉 #工兵认证 【备注】女王,她来了
❤1
Signed 1:23(看看共群,谨防骗子)
杭州大圈每日更新——勤劳日更,全面才专业! 杭州唯一只更新当日上班老师认证视频的大圈频道。大圈流动性大,资料造假严重,时代发展下又出现了配音和AI验证,全面日更不仅仅是重新发视频,也是对每一个女孩反复观察和了解。勤劳才能全面,全面带来专业,专业是为了保障每一个客户的权益! 联系人: @daquanzhongjie (认准+888账号、Lol Pop #123886、三典藏域名) 无法私聊: @daquanzhongjiebot 每日更新: @Hangzhoudaquanmeirigenxin 个人推荐: @CNHZdaquan 凑合能看: @HZcouhe 近期新人: @HZdaquan_new #大圈 #高端 #中介 #外围
❤1
Signed 小鹿 看共群,防骗子
【私聊】@thggfsw 【艺名】 #心悦 【位置】 #拱墅区 【课费】800P 1500PP 【分类】 #御姐 #舌吻 #六九 【备注】 工兵优惠:剩3名 共3名600P/1100PP,需出报告 报名联系:@xiaoLu798 报名流程:群内发送“工兵”获取模板,提交报名表、200颜值以上截图以及过往报告发送至管理报名,无过往报告需400颜值。当日cj优先,管理回复确认,视为报名成功。
Signed 小鹿 看共群,防骗子
【私聊】@Hzmengmengby 【艺名】 #梦梦 【位置】 #上城 【课费】1000P 1800PP 【分类】 #御姐 #六九 #舌吻 #巨乳 #工兵认证 【备注】冷白皮
Signed 小鹿 看共群,防骗子
【都市魅影】 换装女仆spa. ⭐ 主人~来都市魅影spa私密馆,让骚浪极品女仆跪在你面前侍奉 ! ⭐ 在这里,黑丝、短裙、娇喘、湿滑小手……全部为您敞开,榨干你的每一滴~ ⭐️ 799元 · 60分钟 极致榨精服务 ⭐️ (导航)(服务流程) (预约流程) 请看频道 , 群组有福利 🍎【兼职可加联系方式可私约】 房间私密安全氛围极佳,单独房间配置独立卫浴和浴缸 🛁 杭州店 : ❤️ 上城区 - 塘工局路358号 ❤️ 滨江区 - 西兴路2333号 ❗️ 【注意】❗️:无任何类型的会员卡,充值卡,次数卡。 🌷 预约客服 : @nacney ⭐ 双向机器人 :@xnlspabot 🌷 QQ号:3925644979
Signed 小鹿 看共群,防骗子
【私聊】@Lucky65710 【艺名】 #婷婷 【位置】 #拱墅 【课费】1200P 2200PP 【分类】 #嫩妹 #陪浴 #深喉 #69互舔 #毒龙 #可拍视频 【备注】产地四川 【报告】 报告一 二 三 四 五 六 七 八 九 十 十一
❤1
Signed 1:23(看看共群,谨防骗子)
【私聊】@ssopoj06 【艺名】 #双双 【位置】 #拱墅 【课费】800P 1500PP 【分类】 #嫩妹 #舌吻 #69互舔 #深喉 #工兵中 【备注】 工兵优惠:剩3名 共3名600P/1100PP,需出报告 报名联系:@yzsb123_bot 报名流程:群内发送“工兵”获取模板,提交报名表、150颜值以上截图以及过往报告发送至管理报名,无过往报告需300颜值。当日cj优先,管理回复确认,视为报名成功。
Signed 1:23(看看共群,谨防骗子)
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @best_hz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@best_hz edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 757,591 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“杭州颜值新人&开课资源” (@best_hz), 46,194 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/best_hz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.