Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 宁姚的小竹楼

Channel

宁姚的小竹楼

@ningyao1123

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,609subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003507094708
TypeChannel
Username@ningyao1123
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/ningyao1123

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 18:223,609first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.5%
avg views ÷ 3,609 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,860
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.097%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held17 (21 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total22,321
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
29
Videos
14
Links
21

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2184.0%
🤣28.00%
👎14.00%
🤮14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 01:56 UTC652 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

又不回消息是你老婆最近盯太紧了吗?

🤣2

26 Sept 2026, 10:05 UTC799 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026

杭州爆破严选认证报告模板 https://t.me/HZBPYXQ 【老师艺名】宁姚 【老师 I D :】@ningyao233 【出击时间】9月26日 【大概位置】拱墅 【狼友账号】百事可乐加可口 【开课价格】1900P 【老师类型】御姐 【大概年龄】23 【客观评价】超级好评 各项满分为10分,软件.硬件各50 综合100分 硬件: 颜值 9 分 身材 9 分 胸型 9 分 户型 9 分 水量紧度 9.5 分 硬件评分:45.5 软件: 服务态度 9 分 服务技巧 9 分 屌感 9 分 啪啪反馈 8.5 分 突出技巧 8.5 分 软件评分:44 综合评分:89.5 软件硬化工程施工过程: 早就听过宁姚老师六边形战士的传说了,ls正好在中秋假期开课,提前几天成功预约到头课。 小区环境较好,但是需要跟着住户或者里面有人出来才可以混进去,不过没有登记还是能接受的。 遥控上楼,已经提前开门,按照对应操…

❤1

25 Sept 2026, 03:23 UTC989 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

年年月满,岁岁平安 月光所致,万事胜意。 祝你,祝我,祝我们。

17 Sept 2026, 02:40 UTC≈2,750 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

你想要爱 我们做就是了 但是你想要名分 那就是为难我了

❤1

14 Sept 2026, 03:57 UTC≈2,230 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @Mike1985cjVideo

《心甘情愿》这首歌创作时结合老师的名字融入了《剑来》的国风元素,采用男女对唱形式,力图通过舒缓节奏,深情表达与宁姚老师情意绵绵的场景。特别喜欢歌词里的那句“这方寸的床榻是你不拔剑的江湖。”在缠绵悱恻的交织时刻能够忘却烦恼,是我温馨的避风港。新的一周开始了愿大家元气满满,多多出击! 《心甘情愿》-宁姚老师 @ningyao233 窗外的风声还带着点冷硬 你推门而入像火星坠入深林 那袭红裙不借灯火自己燃烧 唇角的烈焰是不写批语的判词 只一眼便烧穿我所有的防备 我原以为你只会握剑前行 谁知褪去锋芒你竟有这般手笔 白昼里那些掷地有声的道理 此刻全融化在交叠的指间里 你低头时的呼吸比晚风更轻 一寸一寸抚平我眉骨上的顽石 宁姚老师这方寸之间的床榻是你不拔剑的江湖 红裙散落成海我甘愿沉溺其间 柔情似水却比绳索更坚韧 你什么都没锁我竟一步也离不开 理智在火光里剥落成灰烬 我不求渡也不问岸的边际 就在你眼底的这汪春水里 做个心甘情愿的…

❤3

14 Sept 2026, 02:46 UTC≈2,350 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026

杭州基金会:https://telegram.me/Foundation_Of_HangZhou 评分标准:6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击时间】:9月13日 【老师花名】:#宁姚 @ningyao233 【出击留名】:西门一只鸭 【开课位置】:拱墅 【修车水费】:竞拍500 【人照评分】:9分 【颜值评分】:9分 【身材评分】:10分 【服务评分】:10分 【态度评分】:10分 【环境评分】:10分 【综合评分】:9.67分 【过程描述】: #环境卫生: 停车方便,房间整洁 有一次性浴巾,有一次性牙刷 #老师优缺点: 开课准时,排课宽松,课时做完 服务到位,无少做、无催课,过程无机车,做爱反馈真实 #硬件软件: 人照相似,颜值不错、甜御气质、御姐穿搭 身高162,比例很好,颈后小纹身科忽略,皮肤手感光滑,🐻c,炮架子 #流程细节: 看到ls上了竞拍,流口水了,必须花大分…

❤3

13 Sept 2026, 03:14 UTC≈2,020 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

别忽冷忽热 我会感冒的 💔

❤1

12 Sept 2026, 09:50 UTC≈2,360 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026

杭州爆破严选认证报告模板 https://t.me/HZBPYXQ 【老师艺名】宁姚 【老师 I D :】@ningyao233 【出击时间】9月 【大概位置】拱墅 【开课价格】1800PP 【老师类型 御姐 嫩妹 名媛 【大概年龄】24 【客观评价】好评 各项满分为10分,软件.硬件各50 综合100分 硬件: 颜值 8.5 分 身材 8.5 分 胸型 9 分 户型 8.5 分 水量紧度 9分 硬件评分:43.5 软件: 服务态度 8.5分 服务技巧 8.5 分 屌感 9.5 分 啪啪反馈 9分 突出技巧 8.5 分 软件评分:44 综合评分:87.5 软件硬化工程施工过程: 早便听闻宁姚老师的声名,先前诸事羁绊,终究没能得见。此番得知老师再度归来,便即刻备好时间,盼能圆上这桩心愿。 老师住在拱墅(对我而言有点远)步入屋内,身形秀丽的红衣女子笑意相迎。宁姚老师并非夺目慑人的明艳长相,而是自带温润韵…

❤2

10 Sept 2026, 05:55 UTC≈2,490 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

回来开课啦啦啦啦~ 明天开课哟

❤1👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ningyao1123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“宁姚的小竹楼” (@ningyao1123), 3,609 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ningyao1123.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.