Channel
@belletdoux
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002874934572 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @belletdoux |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 4 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/belletdoux |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 3 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2025 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 737 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ https://t.me/MinzhuPu/9 https://t.me/ZkangYuanying/124 https://t.me/FatedPage/32 https://t.me/vickysoiree/1915 https://t.me/ssecni/2 https://t.me/soeilaia/13 https://t.me/trulyangeline/8 https://t.me/wonfaire/13 https://t.me/lullabyhall/7 https://t.me/VelourVicky/6537 https://t.me/Caybeara/19 https://t.me/seowrs/9 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ belinda eisle @woynyoung shealova lemionade @crylbabies stacy meirose @yuanyiing liu faith @vwonyoung cayalue marinette @jangyuanyikng aurora cosette @woncy scathie virtu @youanying serena mirj @waony nailéa mist @yuayying elena meire @wowyoung shannaz sevania @wonmyo kasmara galuna @WistfulDoll wystelle carletheia @wvonyoung miuccia aimè @yuanyingt angeline frau @nwony cerys mëhr @wonhyoung …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ amid the birthday festivities ㅤㅤ @jangwonyoung / aug 31'st 🐇🤍 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ️ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ handwritten letter, ✉️ / ⊹ ࣪ ˖ ໒꒱ with a fine kiss of ink low upon her eye. she graced this sphere to be none other than herself, jang wonyoung. enclosed, you are cordially invited to revel in the joy of her birthday on august 31st by penning your fond epistle to @eislebot hello dearest, here's to mark myㅤ presence. i'm ( full name & @ ) thank youu ♡ a heart of white finds its light in eve…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ ㅤornates tenderness inside wonyoung’s ㅤbirthday celebration: candle-lit! timepiece with overture in august eventually bows before fateful juncture that scripted upon letters. herein, i inscribe sincerely with affection to venerate wonyoung’s birthday noontide ⊹ ࣪ ˖ heartbeats pound in giddy cadence whilst utter adorations toward her potrayers: ayaka floryn, yavorina petrova, clover ella, safeea jahz, audrey faw…
Sticker, posted without a caption
hello, birthday roll call is now officially closed! please peek at the list and recheck your name here, if you wanna switch anything up just let me know yaa thank youuu 🤍
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @belletdoux. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,066,596 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“린다 ♡” (@belletdoux), 3 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belletdoux.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.