Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 27
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
23 Feb 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,190 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎➕
✨The sun never sets on a Queen's reign.
Dust settles, but icons shine forever. Riding into town with their REVIVE+ album and the catchy title track called Blackhole, IVE owns every dusty trail like a neon-lit runway. They aren't just wearing crowns but they're the new law of the horizon, dripping in sweet-but-sharp charm with a gaze sharper than any silver spur. This is a stylish showdown of elegance and p…
❤15🔥5🆒4👀2
23 Feb 2026, 09:10 UTC142 viewsread 15 August 2026 Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
2 Feb 2026, 06:20 UTC278 viewsread 15 August 2026 Hidden member
Eusebia Lune @haeuma
Deo Vsevolod @Suengchan
Romen Ash @Cihengxuan
King Miye @RudeDoll
Hiro @Beomzgyu
Maddy Cross @Mpenarik
Taajh @Chdengxun
Marchall @Zongu
2 Feb 2026, 06:20 UTC275 viewsread 15 August 2026 Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
30 Jan 2026, 07:19 UTC331 viewsread 15 August 2026 Leeseo
Wyssie Rou @Xiantrui
Ceysha Valentine @wleeseo
Keia Klane @Lixyanrui
Sechilla Gwyn @lreeseo
Bloom Injor @Laeeseo
Gemara Aushery @gadiiskeciII
Catherine Amyshanne @jiwzochoi
Luz Marela @leeseoe
Catscia Melody @xianruilis
Claire Amy @lleeseo
Maryava Judith @XIlANRUI
Aimisha Cayne @eeyseo
Chastine @hLeeseo
Aurellie Cheryl @gtemass
Catheila Bellevoire @LeeseoLee
Kitsche Lush @dcear
Jecca Alts @lonqlashes
Meidina …
30 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTC295 viewsread 15 August 2026 Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
30 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTC293 viewsread 15 August 2026 Liz Kim
Lizie Amourthy @qlizkim
Yishayla Bloom @lizkimu
Eirlys Everdeen @llizkim
Noraah @kiamliz
Novalisse Divione @lizkmm
Genieve Twila @lizkivm
Cheyriè Ophelia @LizKizm
30 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTC286 viewsread 15 August 2026 Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
30 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTC301 viewsread 15 August 2026 Jang Wonyoung
Myrieth Angié @WVONY
Rosy Vanelle @dottedrosie
Vivienne Wynth @vijcky
Cata Niñez @gFayn
Nona Venya @Wonvyoung
Aurèlynn Vaclavik @wovnyo
Chelsea Gee @Wyonyoung
Minesha Primroses @lpollipop
Clairette de Jongh @jangvirky
Kahana Nakerta @Yluanying
Aurora Cosette @Yuanyinw
Catlish Mewl @Wfonyo
Seichie Netheils @nyopung
Angelina Marié @wonyougg
Callaly Kithcye @Yuannying
Eulalie Pear @yuanyixg
Aruné Namorine…
30 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTC241 viewsread 15 August 2026 Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
30 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTC244 viewsread 15 August 2026 Naoi Rei
Madelaine Caistarla @naoiyei
Clovey Aimee @reiyomi
Rué Nyxie @naaoirei
Nichie Reiya @naoryrei
Citrine Seraphina @Naoi3Rei
Ahraz @reiinaoi
Eunice Tatcher @wnaoi
Violet Eisley @jingqlei
Tsueiryu Miseka @NanoiRei
30 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTC231 viewsread 15 August 2026 Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KimGaveul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@KimGaveul named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bloommyangel
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@dottedrosie
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@faeryse
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@gaeulix
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@gfayn
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@hollowheavens
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@perpetratork
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@yuannying
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@yuanyixg
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ela's Backroom.” (@KimGaveul), 2 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KimGaveul.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.