Channel
@beautyfulxeny
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
332subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001473885308 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beautyfulxeny |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beautyfulxeny |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 332 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 337 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 340 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 340 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 341 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 43.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 30.4% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 8.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwMQQmP | 1 | 1 July 2026 | 1 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 12 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
После просмотра последних кадров админ подал заявление на отпуск 😄 А какие простые радости делают тебя счастливой? Уже не терпится прочитать, что ты напишешь в комментариях 🌊 #разговоры_подружек 🟣 Мы ВКонтакте 🟣 Канал ВКонтакте 🟣 Канал в MAX
❤3
Вновь блондинка 🤨 Как же я люблю это чувство!
❤2🔥1
За последние несколько дней я заказала штук 20 сумок, чтобы выбрать ту, которую буду носить везде и всюду и чтобы ко всему подходила. Оставляю артикулы на те, которые больше всего понравились. А что в результате выбрала, узнаешь в новом влоге 1. Женская сумка MAISON DAVID вб: 963072939 2. Сумка бананка натуральная замша через плечо LeVertige вб: 232815158 3. Alessandro Birutti Сумка с ручками ozon: 3867944883 4. Mor…
🔥2
Помнишь наши сборы на свидание за 15 минут? Переводим задачу на экстремальный уровень 🙀 Время — 15 секунд. В запасе — косметика со скидкой 50% из любимого раздела. Как думаешь, успеем? Смотри и пиши в комментариях, сколько времени тебе нужно на самый быстрый макияж? #гид_подружка Реклама. ООО «Табер Трейд» erid:2VtzqwMQQmP
🔥2
Ругаться на «поехавшую» стрелку во время мейкапа? Абсолютно нормально 🤭 А какие промахи в макияже выводят тебя из себя? Может, скатавшийся тональник или когда один глаз накрашен ярче другого? Делись в комментариях самыми забавными и бесящими случаями 💬 #разговоры_подружек 🟣 Мы ВКонтакте 🟣 Канал ВКонтакте 🟣 Канал в MAX
😁2
Какую помаду выбрать, уместны ли нюдовые оттенки, что взять с собой? Задали визажисту популярные вопросы о макияже на выпускной и попросили показать средство, которое сделает образ особенным. Ты еще успеваешь забрать его и остальные хиты со скидкой здесь 🎆 #новинки_подружки
🥰2
Перемерила несколько брендовых кепок, а выбрала обычную за 300 рублей. Но она супер! Хотела светлую, легкую и чтобы красиво сидела. Ну и надпись мне понравилась, её смысл 🧢 Back to nature process of self healing — Возвращение к естественному процессу самоисцеления
❤2🤩1
Даже если вы ничего не знаете о сериале «Рассказ служанки», то все равно предлагаю посмотреть его продолжение — «Заветы». Я смутно помню историю первого сериала, смотрела очень давно и даже тогда не сразу влилась и осилила сюжет, уж слишком много боли. «Заветы» легче и по мне даже глубже. Посмотрела 1 сезон (10 серий) за пару дней
Попробуйте и делитесь результатом в комментариях 😍 Идею брала в Threads, генерировала в ChatGPT. Промт ⬇️ Проанализируй человека на прикреплённом фото и выбери породу собаки, которая лучше всего визуально соответствует его внешности, выражению лица, стилю, настроению и общей энергетике. Затем преобразуй человека в собаку этой породы, сохранив узнаваемые черты, характер, позу, выражение, композицию и атмосферу исход…
❤3
Подготовила для вас два больших видео: 1. Видео, где я рассказываю о том, как стала креатором магазина «Подружка», а также в целом делюсь опытом работы в этой сфере + параллельно распаковка бокса с косметикой Ютуб ВКонтакте 2. Влог, в котором я беру вас с собой на 2 уличные съемки Рассказываю какого это сниматься одной в общественных местах, мое отношение к этому. Во второй съемке мы будем пробираться на закрытый…
🔥2🤩1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @beautyfulxeny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Красота исцеляет душу” (@beautyfulxeny), 332 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautyfulxeny.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.