Channel
@beauty_posture
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
379subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003092785660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beauty_posture |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beauty_posture |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 379 | no change |
| 29 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 379 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (9 December 2025 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 534 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 51 | 37.2% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 14.6% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 6.57% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 5.11% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 4.38% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VfnxvUPZv1 | 1 | 10 December 2025 | 10 December 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 29 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вчерашний вебинар о коррекционном фитнесе можно посмотреть в записи ✅ Все, кто не смог присутствовать на эфире, могут его посмотреть перейдя по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/d/_OZPJlu4UtXZcA
❤3👍1
Чем коррекционный фитнес отличается от обычного? Этот вопрос я буду подробно разбирать завтра, 28 сентября, на бесплатном вебинаре, который пройдет в 20:00 по Московскому времени 🕗 Количество зрителей ограничено: всего 100 мест. Получить ссылку на вебинар можно через менеджера: @eco_fitness_manager
❤4🔥2👏1
Что будет входить в онлайн-интенсив «коррекционный фитнес»: - 1 тренировка с оценкой опорно-двигательного аппарата лично от меня (продолжительностью 2 часа). - 12 групповых онлайн-тренировок, 1 раз в неделю, которые останутся в записи (с доступом на 3 года). - 3 месяца персональной обратной связь в личном чате (+ будет общий чат). - Бонусом будет доступ к курсу «Статная осанка», по которому тоже можно будет з…
🔥3👌1👍1
Можно ли скорректировать сколиоз/осанку онлайн? Лет 10 назад я бы сказал, что это ближе к невозможному… Но тогда у меня и близко не было таких компетенций и клинического опыта. Сейчас достигнуть существенных результатов в онлайне можно практически так же, как и в офлайне✔️ И достижения моих подопечных доказывают это. На фото промежуточный результат коррекции сколиоза (3 степени) за ~10 месяцев совместной работы, и…
🔥3👌1👍1
Помогает ли корсет для осанки? Очень часто мне приходится отвечать на данный вопрос, и я постоянно говорю одну и ту же фразу: Единственный корсет для осанки, который нужен человеку - мышечный. Никакой «корректор осанки» в виде корсетов и т.п. никогда не исправит вашу осанку🙅🏻♂️ В лучшем случае - ничего не изменится. Чаще ситуация в итоге ухудшается. Почему корсеты могут ухудшить вашу осанку? Потому что ни мышцы…
👍2💯2🔥1
Если вы вдруг думаете, как провести этот холодный зимний день, то ещё можно успеть записаться на сегодняшний мастер-класс🧠 Горячие напитки, а также уютная атмосфера нашей студии позволят скрасить этот день) А ещё, кому-то достанется перкуссионный массажёр от Bork✅
🔥6❤🔥3❤2
Хочу ещё показать результат зарубежных коллег, которые также используют методику Functional Patterns ✅ Красота же 🔥 Если хотите узнать, как добиться аналогичных результатов, то вы ещё успеваете запрыгнуть в последний вагон и записаться на завтрашний мастер-класс✔️ Просто напишите менеджеру 🌱
🔥7😱4😍2
Вы уже видели, как меняется эстетика шеи в моменте, если начать дышать носом 👃🏻 А вот что происходит в перспективе 1-го месяца занятий, если заниматься осанкой посредством функциональных паттернов.
🔥6🏆2👏2🤩1😱1🙈1
Показать вам эстетический результат шеи в анфас и профиль?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Можно увидеть, как при оптимизации лопаток шея визуально удлиняется и становится аккуратнее, если смотреть на человека со спины. Но говоря про шею, как правило, всех интересует в первую очередь вид спереди и сбоку.
👍3💯3🙏1
Ещё сложнее сделать так, чтобы эта оптимизация стала автоматической и интегрировалась в жизнь. Это уже устойчивый результат оптимизации лопаток ~за 2 месяца🗓️
❤5👍3🔥3👏2
Оптимизировать лопатки нетрудно (для компетентного и опытного специалиста), сложнее эту оптимизацию сохранить во время тренировочного процесса 🧠
❤4👍3🔥3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @beauty_posture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Показать вам эстетический результат шеи в анфас и профиль?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хотите узнать, как получить функциональные мышцы живота с устойчивым результатом?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интенсив и результаты про осанку - Бьютимаргиналия и Фитнес критик” (@beauty_posture), 379 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beauty_posture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.