![Telegram profile photo for [• ʙʙᴄ •] ᴇɴsᴇᴊᴀᴍ](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/c8/c81e99f55b3d2ff6920342e1ad138b96af30b7d5d3f3cc2fc013d1ace4022a10.jpg)
Channel
@bbc_Ensejam
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001429423265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bbc_Ensejam |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 10 May 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bbc_Ensejam |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @bbc_Ensejam/20 · this entry10 May 2021, 13:34 UTC | @tm_Ensejam/1710 May 2021, 13:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bbc_Ensejam/28 · this entry14 May 2021, 15:26 UTC | @tm_Ensejam/2214 May 2021, 15:27 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bbc_Ensejam/30 · this entry14 May 2021, 17:33 UTC | @tm_Ensejam/2414 May 2021, 17:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bbc_Ensejam/31 · this entry15 May 2021, 23:03 UTC | @tm_Ensejam/2515 May 2021, 23:03 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bbc_Ensejam/33 · this entry18 May 2021, 09:19 UTC | @tm_Ensejam/2718 May 2021, 09:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @tm_Ensejam | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @tm_Ensejam (5–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 May 2021 to 20 March 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @bbc_Ensejam — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
ب نام خداوند سال 1⁴00 هر طوری بود گذشت خلاصع عمرمون دارع میگذرع اینکه سال و داریم ب 1⁴01 میرسیم سال جدید سالی نامعلوم سالی مثل قبل یا بدتر بهترشو نداریم این سال هم با همه خوبی و بدش گذشت برگشتی وجود ندارع و سال جدید میگذرع تموم میشع مثل همه سال هایی ک گذشت خلاصه عیدتون مبارک #راهــب_انســجام_کـریـتـور_انســـجام T.me/HuRRiD
https://t.me/iUnions جوین شین چنل بدون طرف گیری
یکی بیاد تگ انسجام بدم دستش بچه مچه نوب نیاد فقد T.me/Creator_Ensejam راهــب انســجام T.me/HuRRiD
یکی بیاد تگ انسجام بدم دستش بچه مچه نوب نیاد فقد T.me/Creator_Ensejam راهــب انســجام T.me/HuRRiD
اینم بن کردن از گپ چک مدارک خب چنل افی طرف گیر قبولش ندارم هر بنری از انسجام اونجا بخورع قبول نداریم و واسه فیک کردنش نمیایم اصکل من ک کریتور انسجام هستم داخل عدالت گوهش میگ هویتش فیک رفتم چک مدارک هنوز چت نکردع بن کرد نه واسه جولان نه واسه بنر قبولش نداریم نکته : طرف گیری چنل عدالت افی https://t.me/edaleat و بن کردن این بیناموس @X77VX @ExEreZ #راهــب_انســجام_کـریـتـور_انســـجام
این بیناموس چطووو منو بلاک کردع نمیدونم کی و کجا گایدمش ایدی گوهش : @KilErX #راهــب_انســجام_کـریـتـور_انســـجام
Sticker, posted without a caption
خب دیگ از همه چنل های اتحادی لف میدم بخاطر مشکلات زیاد فعلا باعی اتحادم هر موقع خواستم بیام باز داخل همین #چنل اعلام میکنم : @Raheb_Ensejam البته 2 روز دیگ کلن عاف میشم مجازی نیستم تا اطلاح ثانوی #یاعلی #راهب_انسجام https://t.me/HuRRiD
Sticker, posted without a caption
#کجا برم که نیفته فکرت تو سرم #کجا برم درد تو سرم #کجا برم که چشام دریا نشه #کاش بخوابم فردا نشه...🥀🥀🥀 🎧 #Dɪsʟᴀᴠ 💢 #Rᴀʜᴇʙ.Eɴsᴇᴊᴀᴍ #³ 『 T.me/Yadegari_RaHeB 🥀...♡
#KaL #ارون شاه -| ꪜs |- ممل اسکایپر برد ارون #شاه #علت شاخ شد درخواست تونل داد مادرشو گایدم ایدی این بیناموص @NeT_ZaiEf #ارون_شاه
خب تونل طوری ک من شنیدم به گفته ابول هاریس رگنار وایکینگ بهنام اتکر لغو شده خلاصه میخوام اینو بگم همه رفیق بودن واسه اینکه بین دوستان خراب نشه الان هر کی هر چی میگ مهم نیس ک لغو شد چراع اینجوری شد و این کصشعرا خلاصه میخوام بگم که #تیم_بوکسر هم واسه خودش #حاشیه درست نکنه #راهــب_انســجام_کـریـتـور_انســـجام https://t.me/HuRRiD
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bbc_Ensejam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bbc_Ensejam named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[• ʙʙᴄ •] ᴇɴsᴇᴊᴀᴍ” (@bbc_Ensejam), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbc_Ensejam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.