Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Башкирский гамбит

@bashgambit

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,177subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002081658806
TypeChannel
Username@bashgambit
Created2 May 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bashgambit

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@nonhistory/121431 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC@bashgambit/1286 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC1.0053 minutes
@bashgambit/1290 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC@nonhistory/12152 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC1.0050 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@nonhistory8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.6 hours@nonhistory (53)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @nonhistory. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,1771,1941,185.56 August 2026 — 1,194 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,194 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,185 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,177 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,174–1,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:181,177-8
10 Aug 2026, 03:121,185-9
6 Aug 2026, 08:491,194no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:191,194first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.3%
avg views ÷ 1,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
510
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (30 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total7,136
Reactions total184
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈435 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @radiyhabirov

Отбили очередную террористическую атаку на наши предприятия. Обломки БПЛА упали в уфимской промзоне. Сейчас здесь тушат пожар. Главное, что никто не погиб и не пострадал. Вижу информационные вбросы о том, что из-за этого воздух в Уфе якобы отравлен. Поводов для волнения нет. Мобильные лаборатории контролируют экологическую обстановку.

5 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈468 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlekseyMukhin

Не секрет, что в условиях СВО большую актуальность приобретают высокотехнологичные беспилотные системы. Это одно из самых перспективных направлений для военной отрасли и гражданского сектора России. И здесь в первую очередь важно готовить профессиональные кадры, которые помогут приблизить Победу. Деятельное участие в этом проявляет, например, Башкирия, которая в рейтинге Центра политической информации входит в топ-3

4 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC≈461 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Радий Хабиров стал 7-м в Рейтинге активности глав регионов в социальных сетях за период 27 июля - 2 августа 2026 года от АПЭК Несмотря на отпуск Глава Башкортостана сохранял активность в социальных сетях, что положительно отразилось на его позициях в еженедельном рейтинге Агентства политических и экономических коммуникаций. Основными темами публикаций Радия Хабирова стали реализация проекта Евразийского музея кочев

4 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈437 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @radiyhabirovPhoto

В Башкортостане начинается отбор в новый именной батальон – беспилотных систем. С таким предложением ко мне обратились представители одной из воинских частей. Я эту инициативу поддержал. Почему? Среди наших ребят много желающих служить в войсках беспилотных систем – это элита Вооруженных Сил, за которой будущее нашей армии. А практика формирования башкирских батальонов показывает, что так наша поддержка становится

4 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC≈489 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Радий Хабиров в топ-10 рейтинга активности глав регионов в социальных сетях Глава Башкортостана Радий Хабиров поднялся на 7-е место в еженедельном рейтинге активности руководителей регионов в социальных сетях. Исследование подготовило Агентство политических и экономических коммуникаций по итогам прошедшей недели. Усиление позиций в рейтинге подтверждает устойчивые позиции Главы Башкортостана в публичном поле. На пр

3 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,680 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Оперативка Хабирова: вручение медали Шаймуратова герою СВО, скандал с гаражами для судей, Спартакиада народов России и поручения Минздраву республики Сегодня на оперативном совещании глава вручил медаль генерала Шаймуратова командиру батальона — Герою России, жёстко раскритиковал мэрию Уфы за использование муниципальных машин для перевозки судей в Татарстан. Также Хабиров предложил организовать медобследование для

2 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈470 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @radiyhabirovVideo

По доброй традиции отмечаем День воздушно-десантных войск в военно-патриотическом парке «Патриот». Уже несколько лет подряд мы организуем здесь большой праздник для наших десантников, ветеранов, родных и близких военнослужащих. ВДВ – один из самых боеспособных родов войск наших Вооруженных Сил. «Голубые береты» принимали участие во всех вооруженных конфликтах, которые вела наша страна, защищали Отечество. И сегодня

2 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈506 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ратмир Мавлиев сравнил себя с Биллом Клинтоном, комментируя свой секс-скандал. Бывший мэр Уфы прокололся в личных непорочных связях в интервью каналу Mash_batash, кои ранее категорично отрицал. Параллель с экс-президентом США — любителем множества женщин, провел не моргнув: политик тоже сначала отнекивался от игрищ в коридорах Белого дома с Моникой Левински, но в конце концов связь признал публично. Ратмир, похоже,

2 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈489 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @yalalov

«Моника Левински» как-то совсем неожиданно попадает в башкирскую политику с некоторой разницей: темперамент, место и лица, оказывающие услуги Биллу и Радмиру, всё-таки имели между собой стилистические различия. Если в первом случае это был Президент и его служебный роман в Белом доме, то во втором, как обнюханный гопник базы отдыха, апартаменты и откровенные шлюхи... Ну что тут сказать, мания преследования, отягощён

31 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC≈506 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @politolog_Orlov

Башкортостан: системное присутствие в федеральной образовательной повестке как управленческий ресурс 🔺Аналитика АПЭК ◾️Часть 2 Передовые инженерные школы: реальный технологический суверенитет. В Башкортостане действует передовая инженерная школа (ПИШ) на базе Уфимского государственного авиационного технического университета (входит в Евразийский НОЦ). Школа «Моторы будущего» решает глобальную научно-техническую за

31 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC≈480 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @politolog_Orlov

Башкортостан: системное присутствие в федеральной образовательной повестке как управленческий ресурс 🔺Аналитика АПЭК ◾️Часть 1 Участие главы Республики Башкортостан Радия Хабирова в подкасте Минобрнауки России «Высший пилотаж» стало знаковым событием. Хабиров оказался единственным главой региона среди участников проекта — и это не случайность, а осознанное позиционирование Башкортостана как одного из ключевых науч

31 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC≈475 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Радий Хабиров стабилен на Бирже губернаторов по итогам июля Эксперты ПолитБрокера фиксируют его как одного из устойчивых региональных руководителей, что свидетельствует о сохранении политического баланса в Башкортостане накануне выборов и уверенном контроле Главой РБ ключевых процессов в республике

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bashgambit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 74,964 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Башкирский гамбит” (@bashgambit), 1,177 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bashgambit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.