10 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
1
Channel
全网曝光网频道 @baoguangwangpd
@baoguangwangpd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002419398200 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoguangwangpd |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguangwangpd |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 10 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 10 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 13 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.0%
- avg views ÷ 10 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (13 July 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 01s
- Average length
- 2m 01s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
12 Sept 2025, 01:31 UTC84 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子的昵称：灾 骗子用户名： @IIIooooolll 苹果直达链接：tg://user?id=8115626193 安卓直达链接：tg://openmessage?user_id=8115626193 其他联系方式： 群组频道链接：https://t.me/kunkunooo0 被骗的总金额 ：288 说明被骗过程 ：不是让他给我注册了一个微信嘛 50元，然后要实名认证，又给他转了100，然后他实名说频繁要等过了今天的12点。然后又说不行，然后早上叫我买一个三年的成品号。实名认证好的补100块就行。然后登录又要人脸说解除88又扫他了。然后他就直接拉黑我了一共338 除掉开头那个注册微信50不算的 就被骗了288 公示人: @vip444c
28 Jul 2025, 15:50 UTC122 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video
🔺🔺新增诈骗犯 请谨慎交易🔺🔺 骗子的昵称： 教父 +888/TG账号/代开会员/定制头像 骗子用户名： @j060j 苹果直达链接：tg://user?id=2114312463 安卓直达链接：tg://openmessage?user_id= 2114312463 其他联系方式： 无 群组频道链接： https://t.me/ougau 被骗的总金额： 7u 被骗过程说明： 买卖礼物，发完礼物直接双清 公示人： @leichangzhang66 🌀秘境ps 请勿贪图低价 认准秘境群内靠谱商家
15 Jul 2025, 09:46 UTC130 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
📣新增骗子一枚🆘 网名:特幕担保 用户名:@temu @momo 不变🆔:7731742314 🆘说明:#一群骗子，假担保，还说四字ID，搞好几个假担保，我套别人话，他们达利假担保连18人民币都跑路，骗子担保 @temu @jirba 现在改名常盛担保 @momo，跑路假押狗死全家！！！ 大家注意这个担保 💡建议:做单到认准担保群，不要到垃圾一个四字id的野鸡担保
14 Jul 2025, 06:15 UTC99 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
请按照格式填写 📣新增骗子一枚🆘 昵称名: 骆驼（实权线招商）真名：王国祥 用户名: @lt0924 不变🆔:7904878368 被骗金额⚠️：200 说明🆘:曾经推黑台黑了好几个人了他手机号：15377347197
13 Jul 2025, 15:17 UTC85 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
📣新增骗子一枚！ 骗子UID：8177692135 骗子昵称：乐清 骗子用户名：@lq322 骗子作案过程：这个人主要是搞抖音微信pc，之前在他那挂号转了几百块钱，因此对此人非常信任，但后来号全死了就没怎么联系了，今天突然说带我搞博彩代收50个点，上押押金后等十分钟说要查一下，故意不说清楚怎么查，五分钟期间什么都不催，五分钟一到直接押金扣完，后面我让他解释一下直接聊天记录双清，被摆一道 #曝光网频道 @baoguangwangpd #全网通缉 #反诈中心 #网友曝光
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @baoguangwangpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,367,725 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全网曝光网频道 @baoguangwangpd” (@baoguangwangpd), 10 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguangwangpd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.