Channel
@xiaoshanggan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002558177182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaoshanggan |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 24 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaoshanggan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 3 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 3 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 81.8% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2025 to 28 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
佳怡总中转站: ✔️业务中转站 点击进入 https://t.me/X55555W ✅通知主频道 点击进入 https://t.me/W55555Z ✅申请加入靓号频道选号 https://t.me/+YC5B92agseA2NDkx ✅NFT用户名频道 点击查看 https://t.me/laicailaicailaicailai ✔️NFT礼物频道 点击查看 https://t.me/tgdclw ✔️聊天社区群 点击聊天 https://t.me/wz0116 ✔️佳怡的存钱日记 点击查看 https://t.me/j55555y
你有没有想过一个问题?你18岁成年，所以当你19岁的时候，你才是个1岁的成年人，41岁的时候，也不过是个1岁的中年人，所以干嘛对自己要求这么高呢? 人的痛苦从来不是因为外在的压力，而是来自内在的刻薄 心理学里有个概念叫自我同情，就是像对待朋友一样，对待自己的不完美，我们总是很容易接受1岁的孩子摔倒，但是很难接受41岁的自己为什么不能做得更好，其实人的每个年龄段，甚至每一天都是一个新起点，千万别忘了给每个阶段的自己留个试错期，人生的“完美”并不是把事情做的完美无缺，而是那个不断重生的自我，带着永恒的稚气，走在自己选择的道路上
❤5
不认识了吗
❤1
小伤感 pinned «🏆【红人馆】：作为金融领域中的一个重要概念，发挥着不可或缺的作用。 担保基金是一种专门设立的资金集合，旨在为特定的经济活动或交易提供信用担保，以降低风险和促进资金的流动，同时具备一定规模和实力的保障。 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1️⃣担保网档案: @DanBaoWangDangAn 2️⃣TG红人馆:@WZ0116 @TGHongRenGuan 3⃣曝光网频道 : @BaoGuangWangPD 4⃣担保营地负责人: +299229109»
🏆【红人馆】：作为金融领域中的一个重要概念，发挥着不可或缺的作用。 担保基金是一种专门设立的资金集合，旨在为特定的经济活动或交易提供信用担保，以降低风险和促进资金的流动，同时具备一定规模和实力的保障。 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1️⃣担保网档案: @DanBaoWangDangAn 2️⃣TG红人馆:@WZ0116 @TGHongRenGuan 3⃣曝光网频道 : @BaoGuangWangPD 4⃣担保营地负责人: +299229109
⬛️这段话送给正在焦虑的你 你走路时讨厌车，你开车时讨厌行人 你上班时觉得老板太强势太抠门。你 当老板后你又觉得员工太没责任心没 有执行力你是顾客认为商家太暴力你 是商人又觉得顾客太挑剔。其实我们 都没错，错就错在我们站的位置不同 换位思考，人生才会更美好;换位做人 懂得感恩才能走的更远。特别喜欢的 一段话：生活各自不易，个人所求不 同个人所处立场就不同，勿在别人心 中修行自己,勿在自己心中强求别人！
呃？介素在
❤2
小伤感 pinned «以后高端牛逼的人物都在 https://t.me/wz0116»
Voice message, posted without a caption
88年前的今天 七七事变爆发 88年过去了 卢沟桥上的硝烟早已散尽 盛世中华 山河无恙 但88年前的7月7日永远不能忘 我们每个人都必须铭记历史
以后高端牛逼的人物都在 https://t.me/wz0116
我会记得你们对我的好的
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @xiaoshanggan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,321,693 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小伤感” (@xiaoshanggan), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoshanggan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.