Channel
@baoguang_pd
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
827subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002556967575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoguang_pd |
| Description | 🌏 飞机导航 @xinwen006 🔍新闻热搜： 曝光群1： @baoguangqun06 曝光群2： @baoguang_00 曝光群3： @baoguang_pd 🔍吃瓜群总： 吃瓜群1： @Chiguatoutiao3 🔍探讨群聊： @baoguangqun006 ✍🏻关键词搜索： #网红查黑问题 #+名字 #曝光 #悬赏 #骗子 #名字 ☎️曝光/商务：@iu9886 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 # |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguang_pd |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @baoguang_pd/28584 · this entry6 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | @baoguangqun06/355536 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @baoguang_pd/28585 · this entry6 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | @baoguangqun06/355546 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @baoguang_pd/28589 · this entry6 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | @baoguangqun06/355586 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @baoguang_pd/28590 · this entry6 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | @baoguangqun06/355596 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @baoguang_pd/28592 · this entry6 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | @baoguangqun06/355616 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @baoguang_pd/28593 · this entry6 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | @baoguangqun06/355626 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @baoguangqun06 | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (10–0) |
| @baoguang_00 | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | even |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 June 2026 to 6 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @baoguang_pd — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 827 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 827 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
金边200万美元绑架、勒索、杀人抛尸案告破 5月29日晚，金边朗哥区巴库村一处空地的一辆白色普锐斯轿车内，发现一具被抛尸的中国籍男子尸体，引发广泛关注。 案发后，柬埔寨警方展开案件侦破工作，目前成功抓获4名中国籍犯罪嫌疑人。据披露，此案系中国籍同胞内部恩怨引发。死者与嫌疑人在中国国内便存有仇怨，嫌疑人一路尾随死者至柬埔寨实施报复杀人并抛尸。 目前，4名嫌犯正接受审讯，警方正全力追捕其余在逃同伙。 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
西港皇乐山庄黑公司内幕架构曝光 庆总、老孙、黄冲、浩南、星期五、王子涛，大峰等人。 你们习惯了站在高处指点别人，却很少低头看看自己走过的路。有人把算计当本事，把压榨当管理，把欺负老实人当成能力，把纸醉金迷当成成功。 老孙，你应该最清楚，有些钱来得快，去得更快，有些路看似捷径，走到最后却是绝路。人在顺风顺水的时候，总以为自己聪明过人，可真正决定一个人命运的，从来不是小聪明，而是底线。 黄冲、浩南、星期五，你们整日流连包厢吸毒，把脑子都吸坏了，所有的情绪指向公司内部员工.已上照片是王子涛，后续我会一一附上你们所有人的照片，包括你们家人我都会一一附上！ 王子涛，大峰，你身为主管，本该为员工遮风挡雨，却把员工当成发泄情绪的工具。心情好了高高在上，心情不好便拿员工出气。自己享乐无度，却让基层员工为你的挥霍埋单。你以为压得住别人就是本事，其实真正有能力的人，从来不需要靠践踏别人来证明自己。 古人云：德不配位，必有灾殃；人不配财，…
#最新消息：波贝今天早上一栋大楼被宪兵突袭了，怀疑该建筑内住有外籍人员，涉嫌秘密从事网络诈骗活动。 截止目前为止，局势已被宪兵控制并查获了一个网络诈骗团伙，共抓获21名嫌疑人 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
#最新消息：波贝奥克罗夫乡萨马基棉吉村一栋大楼被突袭，抓铺约21名狗推，目前已经开始装车了。 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
马莱县惊现可疑物资运输车！疑涉网络诈骗活动 6月6日，边境地区媒体在卜迭棉芷省马莱县斗蓬乡进行实地采访调查时，发现一辆大型货运卡车正在运输大批物资，据现场观察，该批物资数量较大，运输方式较为特殊。根据媒体掌握的信息，相关物资疑似与网络诈骗（Online Scam）活动所使用的设备及后勤保障用品有关。 PS：谁家公司搬家撞枪口上了🤣🤣🤣 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
刘会长同款衣服 Casablanca经典真丝长袖衬衫，价格在950刀。这种，是不是人得起飞咯～～ 你即使知道他杀人放火，但慑于或碍于各种因素，都是闭口。 他在前面杀人放火，转头就做慈善，捐资助学，还回报桑梓，各种官方报道，各路官人抬轿，他成了家乡人的骄傲，成了官人宴席上的座上宾... ... 但一旦塌房，马上切割，就不认识了。就这么现实且残酷。 所以，我们其实都一样，人就是现实的动物。也是欺软怕硬的动物。 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
柬埔寨清扫园区以后，现在二手市场价格崩了 从家具、冰箱、彩电、大沙发，到电脑、平板、手机， 还有二手汽车，豪车价格全面下跌 那些园区撤离时甩卖时接手的二手老板，收的时候笑嘻嘻，心里直喊便宜，这些人真傻帽。 现在倒好，全部变成库存，流动不了，价格也全面下跌， 真是愁呀，也不知道什么时候能好转， 也不知道人什么时候来，卖吧要割肉，还不一定能卖掉。 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
#泰国资讯：春武里邦盛公寓藏大型网赌运营中心 资金流水逾5000万泰铢 6月5日，泰国网络犯罪调查警察第二警区（Cyber Police Region 2）联合相关执法单位展开突击行动，成功捣毁位于春武里府邦盛地区一处大型网络赌博运营窝点，初步调查显示，该团伙资金流水超过5000万泰铢。 据了解，此次行动是根据第二警区调查指挥官打击网络犯罪政策部署，由技术犯罪调查与打击部门联合“第二警区网络犯罪中心”共同执行搜查及抓捕任务。警方经过前期调查掌握确凿证据后，对目标公寓展开突袭。 行动期间，警方封锁现场并进入涉案房间时，部分嫌疑人企图销毁犯罪证据，将电脑、手机以及电子存储设备从公寓8楼抛下，导致楼下停放车辆及其他公共财产受损。不过，警方迅速控制现场，成功保全大量关键证据。 搜查过程中，执法人员查获多台台式电脑、笔记本电脑、手机以及大量用于运营网络赌博网站的电子设备，并提取相关数据作为后续调查证据。 经初步调查发现，该团伙涉…
#群友投稿：🇰🇭金边 Urban Village Phase 1 (UV1) 小区楼下【金边富力旁边】，现在有一大群宪兵警察和移民局的人上门检查 刚刚有人下超市买东西直接不给出楼，还在里面或者附近的兄弟注意了！！！ ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
金边七马卡拉区持续开展联合检查行动 严打网络诈骗及外籍人员违规聚集 6月6日上午，按照金边市市长Khuong Sreng阁下的指示，七马卡拉区区长兼区行政统一指挥委员会主席Theng Sothol先生，继续率领区统一指挥委员会成员开展联合检查行动。 此次行动依据柬埔寨《第3号子法令》相关规定，对辖区内酒店、公寓、宾馆、企业以及住宅等外国人聚集场所进行全面检查，重点核查外籍人员居住、就业及相关管理情况。 执法人员重点关注涉嫌从事网络诈骗、电信诈骗及其他跨境违法犯罪活动的场所，加强对可疑人员和重点区域的排查力度。同时，对存在管理不规范、未依法申报住宿信息以及涉嫌违法经营的单位进行检查和依法处理。 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
#最新消息：波贝一栋大楼正在检查，有犯罪活动就抓铺。 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
金边警方捣毁中国籍绑架勒索团伙 其中一人已被拉黑名单竟然又潜回了柬埔寨！ 6月4日，金边市警方成功捣毁一个企图实施绑架勒索的有组织犯罪团伙。 行动中，警方共抓获4名中国籍男子，并现场缴获1支ZORAKI 906 TD手枪、6发子弹和3副手铐。 金边市警察局长尊那林透露，落网嫌犯中包含一名上了入境黑名单的危险分子。首嫌翁某（WENG SHENG FENG，43岁）曾因非法拘禁、酷刑虐待及非法持枪勒索，于2023年11月在柬坐牢15个月，刑满后被驱逐出境并禁止入境。然而，今年5月初，他花费1200美元经老挝偷渡回流至柬埔寨上丁省，随后潜入金边纠集同伙。其余3名落网同伙分别为廖某、宋某和沈某。 尊那林强调，该团伙当时正在密谋策划一起绑架案，若非警方及时收网，后果不堪设想。 目前，4名嫌疑人已被移交轻刑司法办案处，正接受进一步法律审理。 ✅投稿联系 @iu9886
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @baoguang_pd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全球新闻” (@baoguang_pd), 827 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguang_pd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.