Channel
@avrvdhub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
104,175subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001339974228 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @avrvdhub |
| Description | سطونم به کانال خودت خوش اومدی ♥️🩸 کانال شخصی : @avrvd یوتوب : youtube.com/@aradentezar اینستاگرام : instagram.com/avrvd |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/avrvdhub |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 104,175 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 19 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (19 December 2025 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 47,441 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
سلام دوستان. امشب تولد من هست. ممنون میشم از این پست من بازدید کنید و تولدم رو تبریک بگید. دوستون دارم، فعلا. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdzSdhfgjYS/?stkn=MXE2cGJ2dWgyN3hwYg==
UNCUT #08 — همه چیز تموم شده بود! https://youtu.be/K-O3ykg9wBo
بالاخره بعد از سالها سر و کله زدن با MBTI، تصمیم گرفتم یه سری ویدیو دربارهش بسازم. 🧠 قسمت اول منتشر شد. اگه فکر میکنی MBTI رو میشناسی، این قسمت رو ببین؛ احتمالاً چندتا چیز هست که نگاهت بهش رو عوض میکنه 👀 🎬 تست MBTI چیه و چرا انقدر مهمه؟ https://youtu.be/eARxUCieasU?si=G7rbrn_ouhTB3wI6
اگه دنبال یه ویدیوی فانی، اینو نبین. UNCUT #07 — تلهی نوستالژی https://youtu.be/aalXxvutCs4
تو ۱۷ سالگی افسردگی شدیدی داشتم. نمیدونستم میخوام با زندگیم چیکار کنم، همه رو میدیدم که برای زندگیشون یه نقشهی بزرگ ریختن، انتخاب رشته کردن، آیندشونو چیدن، دارن واسش تلاش میکنن، و من؟ من حتی نمیدونستم چرا زندم! با این حال هر روز از خواب بیدار میشدم و مثل هر شخص دیگهای تو جامعه وظایفم رو انجام میدادم. تا این که یه تصادف همه چیزو عوض کرد… وقتی سرم به زمین برخورد کرد، و برای نیم ساعت همه چیز سیاه…
UNCUT #05 — پناهنده شدیم https://youtu.be/90ZPU5HbcqY
https://youtu.be/Ee3Kqeyyk7M?si=hJM2To4s08kmmM8i
👁 The Last House • 2026 👻 #Horror, #Survival 🍿 IMDb: 5.5/10 🍅 F2M: 76% یک خانواده چهار نفره ناگهان در خانه خود حبس میشوند و هیچ راهی برای خروج پیدا نمیکنند. آنها برای زنده ماندن باید با یکدیگر همکاری کرده و در برابر منابع رو به کاهش و تهدید مرموز و شومی که گرفتـارشان کرده است، مقاومت کنند • join @AvrvdHub🩸
امشب کدومش باشه؟👀
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👻 حوصلت سر رفته؟ افراد نزدیک و هم سنتو پیدا کن و ناشناس باهاشون چت کن!
👁 Soulm8te • 2026 👻 #Horror 🍿 IMDb: 5.8/10 🍅 Rotten Tomatoes: 47% مردی برای کنار آمدن با غم از دست دادن همسر تازه درگذشتهاش، یک ربات اندرویدی با هوش مصنوعی تهیه میکند. او در تلاش برای ساختن یک شریک زندگی که احساسات واقعی داشته باشد، ناخواسته این ربات عاشقِ بیخطر را به یک همدم مرگبار تبدیل میکند. • join @AvrvdHub🩸
یه فیلم دیگه امشب بذارم؟
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @avrvdhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
امشب کدومش باشه؟👀
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
یه فیلم دیگه امشب بذارم؟
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
یه فیلم بذارم؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آراد | Arad” (@avrvdhub), 104,175 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avrvdhub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.