Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АВИТО ПФ | Заказать пф авито можно у нас!

Channel

АВИТО ПФ | Заказать пф авито можно у нас!

@avito_pf

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

336subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001432124429
TypeChannel
Username@avito_pf
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/avito_pf

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@avito_pf/791 · this entry11 Jul 2026, 16:29 UTC@avitoy/126820 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC1.009 days
@avitoy/126926 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC@avito_pf/801 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC1.003 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@avitoy9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@avitoy (7–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @avito_pf — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

336341338.57 August 2026 — 341 subscribers7 August 2026 — 341 subscribers14 September 2026 — 339 subscribers8 October 2026 — 336 subscribers7 August 20268 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 62 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 335–342 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 11:16336-3
14 Sept 2026, 08:36339-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:32341no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:28341first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎈ПРИВАТНЫЙ МЕТОД ВЫВОДА В ТОП ПОИСКА ЯНДЕКСА ЗА 30 МИНУТ*!! ✈️ Цена: Тест 5000р Месяц ~60к 🔐 Гарантии: Приватный и безопасный метод накрутки Работаем на результат, а не цифры. 🔥 Бонусы: Работаем с сайтами любой сложности Поможем вывести ключи в индекс (отдельная услуга) Для постоянных клиентов бесплатный анализ сайта. Решаем/помогаем улучшить результаты вашей деятельности Дадим рекомендации как исправить ошибки на…

30 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026

Удаление отзывов с популярных платформ. Работаем по постоплате (после выполнения работы) @Mikhail_Avito_AVP

30 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @avitoy

Скидка на обучение по бидеру. 1500р вместо 10к. Вы научитесь настраивать бидер авито. Сможете предлагать услуги по настройке и зарабатывать на этом. @Mikhail_Avito_AVP

29 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @avitoy

🔍 Кейс "Как делать отзывы самому" - Прохождение модерации - Технические нюансы - Пошаговый алгоритм действий Цена 990р 490р. Подробнее- @Mikhail_Avito_AVP 💬

29 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @avitoy

Скидка на обучение по бидеру. 1500р вместо 10к. Вы научитесь настраивать бидер авито. Сможете предлагать услуги по настройке и зарабатывать на этом. @Mikhail_Avito_AVP

28 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @avitoy

ЛИДЫ С ЯНДЕКСА для вашего сайта. Как делаем мы: Мы анализируем все ядро. Собираем конверсионные ключи (на которых есть лиды, заказы, заказчики и т.п.) Мы создаем органические переходы, люди с поиска будут находить ваш сайт и ходить по нему. Как делают другие: Берут нч и вч и разные ключи, смотрят где сайт более менее и подкручивают его. По статистике все красиво, потому-что Топвизор снимает позиции с сайта обезличе…

28 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @avitoy

ПРОРАБОТКА И УДАЛЕНИЕ НЕГАТИВНЫХ ОТЗЫВОВ ✅ ⚡️ ЯНДЕКС КАРТЫ / ПРОРАБОТКА И УДАЛЕНИЕ НЕГАТИВНЫХ ОТЗЫВОВ ► ВРЕМЯ УДАЛЕНИЯ 7-14 ДНЕЙ ► ОПЛАТА ПОСЛЕ УДАЛЕНИЯ ► СТОИМОСТЬ УДАЛЕНИЯ 1 ОТЗЫВА 5.000₽ ⚡️ 2GIS / ПРОРАБОТКА И УДАЛЕНИЕ НЕГАТИВНЫХ ОТЗЫВОВ ► ВРЕМЯ УДАЛЕНИЯ 7-14 ДНЕЙ ► ОПЛАТА ПОСЛЕ УДАЛЕНИЯ ► СТОИМОСТЬ УДАЛЕНИЯ 1 ОТЗЫВА 5.000₽ ⚡️ Google Maps / ПРОРАБОТКА И УДАЛЕНИЕ НЕГАТИВНЫХ ОТЗЫВОВ ► ВРЕМЯ УДАЛЕНИЯ 7-14 ДНЕЙ ►…

26 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC5 viewsread 7 August 2026

Жаркие скидки на обучение по бидеру авито. 2490р вместо 10000р. Акция актуальна пока в вашей локации жара, пруфы присылайте в личку)) @Mikhail_Avito_AVP

20 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎈ПРИВАТНЫЙ МЕТОД ВЫВОДА В ТОП ПОИСКА ЯНДЕКСА ЗА 30 МИНУТ*!! ✈️ Цена: Тест 5000р Месяц ~60к 🔐 Гарантии: Приватный и безопасный метод накрутки Работаем на результат, а не цифры. 🔥 Бонусы: Работаем с сайтами любой сложности Поможем вывести ключи в индекс (отдельная услуга) Для постоянных клиентов бесплатный анализ сайта. Решаем/помогаем улучшить результаты вашей деятельности Дадим рекомендации как исправить ошибки на…

18 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @avitoy

🔍 Кейс "Как делать отзывы самому" - Прохождение модерации - Технические нюансы - Пошаговый алгоритм действий Цена 990р 349р. Акция ограничена. Будет проданно 3 копии. Подробнее- @Mikhail_Avito_AVP 💬

18 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC10 viewsread 7 August 2026

Большие скидки на услуги 18-19.07.26 Успейте заказать наши услуги по выгодной цене!! Подробнее - @Mikhail_Avito_AVP

17 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC9 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @avitoy

Основные услуги по продвижению авито. ⦁ Создание продающего контента под ключ - 5000р ⦁ Разовая настройка бидера (+подключение) - 3000р ⦁ Как занять топ 5 (инструкция) - 1000р* _ *Выдаеться бесплатно при заказе от 5000р (бонус) Подробнее - https://t.me/Mikhail_Avito_AVP

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @avito_pf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АВИТО ПФ | Заказать пф авито можно у нас!” (@avito_pf), 336 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avito_pf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.