Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الْحِكْمَةُ اليَمَانِيَّة

Channel

الْحِكْمَةُ اليَمَانِيَّة

@avdulilhhikma

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

404subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002616042810
TypeChannel
Username@avdulilhhikma
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/avdulilhhikma

Growth

403404403.57 August 2026 — 403 subscribers8 August 2026 — 403 subscribers16 August 2026 — 404 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 403–404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:03404+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:47403no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:11403first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 404 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (3 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,133
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC32 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PosteriorAnalyticsPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

6 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PosteriorAnalyticsFile

File, posted without a caption

5 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mahmoudnabil1445Photo

الأرسطية واتجاه المنهج العقلي البرهاني وصل إلى ذروته في إيطاليا على يد يعقوب زاباريلا الذي اعتبروه وعدّوه أعظم منطقي بعد أرسطوطاليس. الفاضل محمد ناصر

5 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

خطوات للتحكم في الانفعال من كتاب القانون العقلي للسلوك

5 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026

"ومن هذا يُستقىٰ السبب في وجود كثير من الفلاسفة ممن نالوا قسطًا وافرًا من التعليم في التهذيب الأخلاقي، ومع ذلك يظلون أشرارًا ومنغمسين في الرذيلة؛ ذلك لأنهم في العلم الأخلاقي لم يتعلموا سوى القضية الكلية، التي لا يتبعها أي فعل ما لم تُضف إليها مقدمة صغرى جزئية. ومن ثمَّ، يصف أرسطو هذه المقدمة الصغرى بأنها «سيدة الفعل)). فهؤلاء القوم يمتلكون حقًا معرفة بالملكة الأخلاقية، لكنهم لا ستخدمون تلك المعرفة؛ لأن استخدامها يعني

4 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC78 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @eaqalil2

"قد يسأل سائل (...): لِمَ لم يُعلّم أرسطو في منطقه شيئًا عن الترتيبات، مع أنَّه ناقش المناهج بأقصى درجات العناية والإسهاب؟ يمكن لهذا السؤال أن يُعذّب كثيرًا نفوس أولئك الذين يعتقدون أنَّ الحكم على أرسطو بالقصور والنَّقص في أي من بحوثه خطيئة، وكأنَّه كان لزامًا عليه أن يعلم كل شيء وأن يكتب كل ما علمه. ومع أنِّي لا أريد أن أكون دون أي بشر في الإعجاب بذكاء أرسطو، إلَّا أنِّي أعتقد مع ذلك أنَّه لم يكن بوسعه أن يعلم كل ش

4 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026

"إن الفيلسوف النظري يروم نيل المعرفة بكل الأشياء الجديرة بالمعرفة؛ ولذلك نخضع كل الأشياء لتأمله - ولا أقول كل الأشياء فحسب، بل كل السبل التي يمكن بها معرفتها، بحيث لا يُترك شيء معلوم للعلوم الأخرى. ومع ذلك، فإن هذه العلوم تطلب هي الأخرىٰ موضوعًا واقعًا تحتها تعمل فيه. وبناءً عليه، فإنها جميعًا تأخذ موضوعًا ما من الفلسفة النظرية لتنشغل به، ولكن بقصد يختلف عن قصد الفيلسوف النظري نفسه. فهو ينظر في الأشياء من أجل معرفتها

4 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC109 viewsread 8 August 2026

"ذلك أننا إن بحثنا عن الغاية الكلية للمنطق بأسره، فلن نجدها سوى بناء القياس. أما إن بحثنا عن الغاية الرئيسية، فهي البرهان؛ فالقياس يشمل حتىٰ الكتب الجدلية والسفسطائية، في حين أن البرهان لا يشمل الكتب الأخرى إلا من حيث إن تلك الكتب تخدم البرهان بوجه ما، كما سنبين لاحقاً." -يعقوب زاباريلا-

4 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC78 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PosteriorAnalytics

"الرياضيات تعوِّد العقل على التجريد؛ والفلسفة الطبيعية تكتشف الطبائع المجردة؛ وهذه تتأملها ما بعد الطبيعة." قيصر القَرْموني

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC219 viewsread 8 August 2026

في ان المنطق وضع من اجل الفلسفة وحدها "ومع أن المنطق قد وُضع من قِبَل الفلاسفة لأجل الفلسفة وحدها، فقد حدث أنه بمجرد ظهوره، وُجِد نافعًا لجميع العلوم الأخرى أيضًا. ومع ذلك، لا ينبغي بناءً علىٰ ذلك أن يُسمىٰ آلةً لجميع العلوم، بل للفلسفة وحدها؛ إذ وضعته الفلسفة وحدها ومن أجل الفلسفة وحدها. ولم تكن الصنائع قادرةً علىٰ توليد المنطق، ولا كانت هي العلة الغائية لتوليده؛ بل كانت الفلسفة وحدها هي العلة-الفلسفة النظرية بالدر

25 Jul 2026, 21:59 UTC216 viewsread 8 August 2026

في منهج المعلم الأول التوفيقي "It is therefore not surprising that one finds it so difficult to pinpoint Aristotle’s own claims about akrasia, for his generously conceived method puts him everywhere in a sort of neutral position, from which he tries to rescue if not all, at least most, or the most important reputable opinions on a certain topic." -Akrasia in Greek Philosophy, introduction -

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @avdulilhhikma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,135,980 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الْحِكْمَةُ اليَمَانِيَّة” (@avdulilhhikma), 404 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avdulilhhikma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.