Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Академия

Channel

Академия

@atgrowth

Not marked by Telegram, checked 22 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

546subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002202981250
TypeChannel
Username@atgrowth
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/atgrowth

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@biztrackers/104531 Jan 2026, 14:58 UTC@atgrowth/78 · this entry31 Jan 2026, 14:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@biztrackers/104826 Feb 2026, 05:17 UTC@atgrowth/81 · this entry26 Feb 2026, 05:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@biztrackers/10492 Mar 2026, 08:31 UTC@atgrowth/82 · this entry2 Mar 2026, 08:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@biztrackers/105124 Mar 2026, 08:02 UTC@atgrowth/83 · this entry24 Mar 2026, 08:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@biztrackers/105330 Mar 2026, 12:06 UTC@atgrowth/84 · this entry30 Mar 2026, 12:08 UTC1.0072 seconds
@biztrackers/105629 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC@atgrowth/86 · this entry29 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@biztrackers11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@biztrackers (11–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 June 2025 to 11 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @biztrackers. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5465605537 August 2026 — 560 subscribers8 August 2026 — 560 subscribers16 August 2026 — 558 subscribers22 August 2026 — 554 subscribers30 August 2026 — 555 subscribers7 September 2026 — 553 subscribers29 September 2026 — 551 subscribers16 October 2026 — 550 subscribers23 October 2026 — 548 subscribers29 October 2026 — 546 subscribers7 August 202629 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 83 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 544–562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Oct 2026, 16:36546-2
23 Oct 2026, 13:54548-2
16 Oct 2026, 21:50550-1
29 Sept 2026, 08:57551-2
7 Sept 2026, 14:21553-2
30 Aug 2026, 13:56555+1
22 Aug 2026, 22:18554-4
16 Aug 2026, 03:17558-2
8 Aug 2026, 03:34560no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:23560first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5046.3%
👍2926.9%
❤2321.3%
🆒32.78%
🙏21.85%
🤔10.926%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 06:35 UTC174 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Зову своих в Горячий цех Телеграм сдувается; Вконтач — так и не стал нормальной площадкой. Дзен — помойка для сеошников. Ну а Макс — это Макс. И че делать-то? Голубей почтовых заводить? Вообще забить и надеяться, что авось рассосется? Продолжать пинать дохлую кобылу в надежде, что все поставят КВН? Я лично ставлю на Threads. Аргумента три: 1. Русскоязычная аудитория быстро растет. 2. Охваты не режут: можешь с одно…

❤2

28 May 2026, 08:10 UTC238 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Есть удочка — хочу корабль Я умею привлекать трафик — Индекс дятла, Твиттер, Сообщество трекеров не дадут соврать. Вот только это, ппц, как затратно по времени. Могу через аутрич, сообщества и вирусные штуки привлечь 5-30 человек в неделю. А надо — 500+. Один не справлюсь. Поэтому делаю то, что всегда у меня работает — собираю маленькую группу, эдакий спецназ, и иду вместе с ними. Сейчас это — РЫБАКИ. Исследовател…

🔥4👍2

13 May 2026, 06:27 UTC284 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это полный РАЗЪ@П СЛЕТ Торбичев кричит, что трекинг умирает. Остальных — вообще не слышно. Поныкались в Лиссабонах и Люксембургах :) А пока суть да дело — Женя Морозов, выпускник АТ и лучший трекер прошлого года — организует очередной слет. И да — это единственное живое место, которое осталось у трекеров. Место, где можно забрать то, что работает; отказаться от того, что сдохло, да и просто кайфануть. 17-19 июня …

🔥7🆒3

12 May 2026, 07:59 UTC252 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, я к вам с повинной. Многие из вас учились в Академии и работают по методологии, которую мы дали. И она буксует — чем дальше, тем больше. — Клиент берет задачу на спринт типа «провести 5 интервью». Иногда даже проводит (чаще — нет), но ничего не меняется. — Первый месяц ты не можешь понять, чего же он, чубака, хочет по-настоящему. А потом доходит — блин, да он и сам не знает. И что делать-то? — «Все понятно…

🔥6👍2

29 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC273 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Все максимально понятно» 18 апреля я бахнул практикум по Claude — вытащил все свои фишки и находки на свет. Но такого не ожидал. Из 37 участников 29 написали мне в личку или в паблик благодарности. Чтобы 80% оставили отзывы — впервые в жизни. И везде почти повторяется одно и то же: «это ускорение в 10-100 раз в моем бизнесе. хочу дальше». 15 человек пришли по рекомендациям просить повторить практикум. Ну раз есть…

🔥3

30 Mar 2026, 12:08 UTC400 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Видеопекарня + 1 Телеграм блокируют. Я писал об этом три недели назад и позвал людей идти в видео вместе со мной. Места закончились за день. Сегодня утром мы стартовали: восемь человек, 12 недель, 20 роликов на каждого. И тут один участник вышел. Освободилось одно место. Я не буду повторять, зачем видео — если вы читали пост, вы знаете. Если не читали — вот суть: алгоритмы YouTube и TikTok раздают охваты, которые …

🔥5

24 Mar 2026, 08:03 UTC402 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Трекеры, у нас проблема Мы умеем разбирать чужие бизнесы. Задавать правильные вопросы. Находить узкие места. Но когда дело доходит до собственного продвижения — сидим в чатиках и ждём сарафан. Сколько из вас за последний год сделали хоть один ролик? Не кружочек в телеге. Ролик. С мыслью, со сценарием, с публикацией на площадке, где есть алгоритмы и новая аудитория. Вот и я не сделал. Хотя два года собирался. Телег…

🔥7❤1

2 Mar 2026, 08:31 UTC406 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто платит раньше — получает больше. Кто тянет — получает счёт. Через 12 дней стартует новый курс «Трекер основателей AI-продуктов». Но я сделал штуку, которой раньше никогда не было. Те, кто уже оплатил — прямо сейчас получают 5 живых встреч до старта программы. Бесплатно. Как бонус за решительность. 1. Баги мышления предпринимателя. 2. Настоящая и иллюзорная ценность. 3. Принципы работы трекера. JTBD. 4. Делайте…

👍6

26 Feb 2026, 05:18 UTC435 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Торбичев заварил, Торбичеву и расхлебывать Ребят, давайте начистоту. Я знаю, что многие из вас так и не начали трекать. Прошли курс, загорелись, а потом — тишина. Клиенты не пришли. Или пришли, но платить не захотели. Или вы сами не решились предложить. Не буду врать, что это нормально. Но и не буду делать вид, что виноваты только вы. Я выпускал людей в мир, который кончился. Фаундеры теперь сами делают то, за что …

👍8🔥4🤔1

4 Feb 2026, 09:02 UTC503 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ищу 5-7 человек в команду на курс Product Games — участие почти бесплатное. Коллеги, у меня есть возможность взять небольшую команду на наш 8-недельный курс по созданию AI-продуктов на суперльготных условиях. Что будем делать: Вместе строим реальный продукт — «Карманный психотерапевт для отношений». Это бот, который помогает разбирать конфликты в паре, выявлять повторяющиеся паттерны, анализирует переписку и эмоции…

🔥4❤2👍1

31 Jan 2026, 14:59 UTC578 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Метрики, которые ломают шаблон Пользователи Replica общаются с виртуальными девушками 2.7 часа в день. Больше, чем в ТикТоке. Команда зарабатывает 2.5 долларов в год на каждого сотрудника. Что продают? AI-подружек для одиноких людей. Записали с Артёмом Холодовым выпуск про «неудобные» ниши, где стартапы делают безумные деньги. Разобрали 5 кейсов — от виртуальных компаньонов до AI-бабушки, которая держит мошенников…

❤4👍1

9 Dec 2025, 06:06 UTC631 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Трекеров не существовало. Мы их придумали» — история, которую вы не знали В подкасте «Докрутим до ясности» вытащили из Андрея Торбичева признание о том, как появилась наша профессия. 2019 год. Диалог с ФРИИ: — Нам нужны трекеры для портфеля — Их всего 30 человек на весь рынок — А где взять ещё? — Нигде. Их не существует Тогда вложили 10+ млн рублей и создали Академию трекеров. Придумали профессию с нуля. Сейчас …

❤3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atgrowth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Inna Matisson ИННА МАТИССОН
@Inna_Matisson · 34,218
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 September 2026
Индекс дятла
@dindex · 22,222
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Академия” (@atgrowth), 546 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atgrowth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.