π₯ 2022 Results π₯ Itβs about time I calculated last years resultsβ¦& theyβre in π π 21,930+ pips were accumulated π *If you were on Hugosway, this would equate to* : 0.01 = $2,193 0.05 = $10,965 0.10 = $21,930 1.00 = $219,300 38/69 π― (55%) Last year was super solid and I hope you all enjoyed it & made some good profits. Itβs about time to get back to trading π¨π½βπ» For those of you who are interested in going the pβ¦

Channel
π° AstralFX Signals π°
@astralfxsignals
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
138subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001290568274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astralfxsignals |
| Description | Free Signals π₯ For VIP signals -> @astralfxsignalsbot Any questions, feel free to message me @meezytk |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astralfxsignals |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 138 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 138 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 4 February 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 55
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
π₯ Weekly Resultsπ₯ NAS 1750+ pips β NAS (2) -290 pips β 1/2 (50%) Net total: 1460+ pips β β β 0.01 = $146 0.05 = $730 0.10 = $1,460 1.00 = $14,600 Absolute FIRE of a week with a monster of a trade so happy for that. Hopefully you guys were able to make some nice profits! π° I actually missed two callouts this week which kinda suckedβ¦ One just barely missed my entry and the second happened during asian session and I tβ¦
π₯ September Results π₯ Week 1: 600+ pips β Week 2: 300+ pips β Week 3: 630+ pips β Week 4: -200 pips β 4/6 π― (67%) Net total: 1330+ pips β β β 0.01 = $133 0.05 = $665 0.10 = $1,330 1.00 = $13,300 If I stopped trading this Monday, it would have been a flawless month but I thought I saw more opportunity and instead they were Lβs. All good tho, still a decent month. Picked up a ton from last month in terms of price actβ¦
π₯ June Results π₯ Week 1: -180 pips β Week 2: 2120+ pips β Week 3: -160 pips β Week 4: 1870+ pips β 3/6 (50%) π― Net total: 3650+ pips β β β 0.01 = $365 0.05 = $1825 0.10= $3,650 1.00 = $36,500 Only 6 trades this entire month & only won half of them, yet look at the profits π₯Άπ€ The power of risk to reward is unmatched. The biggest loss is -180 pips while the biggest win was 1870+ pips. Gotta love it. Hope yaβll made sβ¦
π₯ Weekly Results π₯ NAS 1500+ pips β NAS (2) 900+ pips β NAS (3) -280 pips β 2/3 π― (67%) Net total: 2,120+ pips β β β 0.01 = $212 0.05 = $1,060 0.10 = $2,120 1.00 = $21,200 Beautiful week last week as we caught some great snipes that both went to final TP π°Had a small loss in there but overall a very profitable week! Looking forward to seeing what this week holds π Make sure to go over the pinned messages if you neeβ¦
π₯ MAY RESULTS π₯ Week 1: 330+ pips β Week 2: 1820+ pips β Week 3: 900+ pips β Week 4: -150 pips β 7/8 π― (88%) Net total: 2900+ pips β β β 0.01 = $290 0.05 = $1,450 0.10 = $2,900 1.00 = $29,000 Iβm going to be going away later today so I doubt Iβll be able to trade the rest of the week so figured Iβd post the results for May. Absolute banger of a month! π€ ALMOST went flawless for the entire month but that very last tβ¦
π₯ Weekly Results π₯ NAS 300+ pips β US30 600+ pips β 2/2 π― (100%) Net total: 900+ pips β 0.01 = $90 0.05 = $450 0.10 = $900 1.00 = $9,000 Back to back flawless weeks π€ Gotta love it. Had a few more idea this week but some were just too quick of movements to call but still a great week nonetheless. Hope you guys enjoyed & made some good profits π° See you next week π
I no longer trade forex myself as indices are simply a different beast. Quicker trades, less manipulation & donβt have to hold through nonsense. If you want to give indices a go, thereβs a $25 trial here: @astralfxsignalsbot
π₯ Weekly Results π₯ US30 600+ pips β NAS 200+ pips β NAS (2) 720+ pips β SPX 300+ pips β 4/4 π― (100%) Net total: 1820+ pips β 0.01 = $182 0.05 = $910 0.10 = $1,820 1.00 = $18,200 Flawless week π₯ Market has been pretty choppy & wild lately but still managing to catch some decent trades. Letβs see how this weeks looking, hopefully we can get more nice opportunities π°
π₯ 1st Quarter Results π₯ Jan 4470+ pips β Feb 840+ pips β Mar 3380+ pips β Net total: 8690+ pips β β β 0.01 = $869 0.05 = $4,345 0.10 = $8,690 1.00 = $86,900 First quarter complete and pretty happy with these results! Keep in mind, January only one week was traded & February only two weeks were traded and these are the results netted ππ€― Hope you guys are happy with these results! Looking forward to smashing this nexβ¦
800+ pips were caught relatively quickly today in the VIP room π₯ A 0.01 lot size would have you netted you $80 minimum. Stop missing out πͺ Join here β¬οΈ @astralfxsignalsbot @astralfxsignalsbot
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @astralfxsignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 516,640 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ° AstralFX Signals π°β (@astralfxsignals), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astralfxsignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.