Channel
@artem_prokofiev_duma
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
506subscribers
-158 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001275239515 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artem_prokofiev_duma |
| Created | 23 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artem_prokofiev_duma |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 506 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 516 | -128 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 644 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 648 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 657 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 661 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 664 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 664 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
72 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 44.4% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 20.8% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| custom 5985386442824619877 | 1 | 1.39% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
КПРФ идет на выборы с Программой Победы В офисе Татарстанского республиканского комитета КПРФ провели пресс-конференцию, посвященную участию КПРФ в выборах депутатов Государственной Думы девятого созыва. Главной темой пресс-конференции стала Программа Победы КПРФ — реальная альтернатива нынешнему социально-экономическому курсу и план развития страны в интересах большинства граждан. Рассказал об итогах выдвижения и…
❤2👏2👍1
‼️ На выборах Госдумы КПРФ будет стоять в бюллетене под номером 8 Наша делегация только что вышла из Центризбиркома, где проводилась жеребьёвка. Вот в таком порядке партии будут расположены в избирательном бюллетене. ☝️ Очень хорошая новость заключается в том, что партии, которые создавались только для того, чтобы оттягивать голоса у КПРФ, будут стоять в бюллетене ниже нас. Значит, намного уменьшается вероятность…
👍4❤2👏1custom 59853864428246198771
В Госкомитете РТ по туризму провели очередное заседание рабочей группы по вопросам участия Татарстана в реализации государственных программ и федеральных проектов. Рассмотрели два ключевых вопроса: ход реализации национального проекта «Туризм и гостеприимство» в Республике Татарстан, а также реализацию проекта «Казань Марина», который является одним из крупнейших инвестиционных проектов в туристической отрасли регио…
👍4❤2👏1🤝1
‼️ КПРФ предложила предоставить кредитные каникулы продавцам, потерявшим свой товар в результате ударов ВСУ по складам маркетплейсов. Вместе с моими товарищами по фракции КПРФ в Госдуме Марией Дробот, Георгием Камневым, Алексеем Куринным и Артёмом Прокофьевым направили письмо с этим предложением главе правительства России Михаилу Мишустину. Прокомментировал нашу инициативу для ТАСС. После ударов по складам Wildber…
👏3🔥3🤝2
В Кремле подвели итоги работы Государственной Думы VIII созыва Сегодня в Георгиевском зале Большого Кремлевского дворца состоялась встреча Президента Российской Федерации Владимира Владимировича Путина с депутатами Государственной Думы VIII созыва. Глава государства отметил, что прошедшие пять лет стали для России одним из самых сложных и ответственных периодов современной истории. Президент поблагодарил депутатов …
👍7❤2👏2
Председатель ЦК КПРФ Геннадий Зюганов на пресс-подходе перед финальным пленарным заседанием Госдумы восьмого созыва 27 июля подвел итоги пятилетки, представил программу Победы и призвал власть к диалогу для перехода к бюджету развития. В начале выступления лидер коммунистов отметил, что партия отчиталась перед избирателями и выпустила программу Победы тиражом 20 миллионов экземпляров. Охарактеризовав минувшие пять …
👍3❤1🤝1
Туризм - это жизнь! 5 лет работы Комитета по туризму - это: - 46 проработанных законопроектов; - 27 принятых федеральных законов - 17 прямых законов и 10, где Комитет выступил соисполнителем; - 300 мероприятий: парламентские слушания, выездные «круглые столы» в регионах, расширенные заседания Комитета и др; - 9000+ отработанных обращений граждан; - 16 рабочих групп Комитета, которые ведут работу по отдельным напра…
👍4🤝3❤2🔥1
Фракция КПРФ, даже работая в меньшинстве, может добиваться результатов. О некоторых итогах нашей работы и о том, за что КПРФ продолжит бороться, — в пресс-подходе фракции.
👍4❤3🔥3
Сегодня из подмосковного совхоза имени Ленина в зону СВО отправился очередной, 157-й гуманитарный конвой КПРФ. С приветственным словом выступил лидер КПРФ Геннадий Андреевич Зюганов: «Фронт и поле боя каждый день требуют реальной помощи и поддержки». В этот раз в составе конвоя отправляются специальные автомобили УАЗ, квадрокоптеры, несколько десятков кроссовых мотоциклов для мобильных групп, продовольствие, медика…
👍5❤1👏1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @artem_prokofiev_duma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Artem Prokofiev |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian politician |
| YouTube | UCv4HNWbQi69GGoHoAPRxc2A |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артем ПРОКОФЬЕВ” (@artem_prokofiev_duma), 506 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artem_prokofiev_duma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.