Channel
@arcticaacademy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002312014153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arcticaacademy |
| Description | prekybos mokymai, kuriuos veda kanalo autorius – @cryptoarctica |
| Created | 26 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arcticaacademy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 93 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 93 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 26 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
❄️ Arctica Academy – tavo kelionės pradžia į pelningą prekybą rinkoje Mes nesiūlome iliuzijų – siūlome žinias. Neturime nuotraukų prie Lamborghini. Nešvaistome laiko pozavimui su laikrodžiais ir grynais pinigais. Mes ne tie, kurie pardavinėja sėkmės iliuziją – mes tie, kurie realiai dirba rinkoje. Nuosekliai. Disciplinuotai. Arctica Academy – tai vieta, kur išmoksti galvoti kaip profesionalus prekiautojas: suprasti…
Kai žmogus ateina į rinką, deja, jis ne visada suvokia tikrąsias kainos judėjimo priežastis. YouTube ir kiti šaltiniai pilni įvairių indikatorių aprašymų ir kitokios nesąmonės, ir žmogui atrodo – ŠTAI JI – TAI, KO MAN REIKĖJO, IR PAGAL APRAŠYMĄ TAI VEIKIA. Bet tada ateina nusivylimas. Stebuklingas indikatorius neveikia. Slapta strategija iš YouTube – irgi. O žinote kodėl? Todėl, kad jas kuria teoretikai, o ne pra…
Saugokitės naujienų. Įsidėmėkite – pernelyg didelis dėmesys kriptovaliutų naujienoms internete veda prie klaidų. Viskas labai paprasta – dauguma naujienų yra apgaulingos ir nenaudingos. Kuo greičiau su tuo susitaikysite, tuo greičiau tapsite šaltakrauju prekiautoju ir sukursite prekybos sistemą, paremtą paklausos ir pasiūlos dėsniais (tikrosiomis kainų judėjimo priežastimis). Naujienos – tai emocijos, o emocijos pre…
Apie įėjimo taškus ir tai, kaip jie padeda išsaugoti depozitą. Išanalizavęs statistiką, pasikalbėjęs su prekiautojais ir mokiniais, aš aiškiai supratau formulę, kas tiksliai „suėda“ treiderio pelną – tai neatsakingas požiūris įėjimo taškų atžvilgiu. Bet kokiu atveju jūs darysite nuostolingus sandorius – tai rinkos dėsnis! Tačiau jūsų užduotis – padaryti taip, kad nuostolingų sandorių būtų mažiau nei pelningų. Skamb…
Šiandien kalbėsime apie kapitalo valdymą. Laikau šią temą pačia svarbiausia. Kiekvieną kartą, kai atidarau sandorį: 1. Žiūriu, kad procentas nuo vieno sandorio neviršytų 10% mano depozito. Bet paprastai tai būna 3-5%. Bet mano depozitas yra didelis. Jei jūsų depozitas yra iki 10.000$, rizika vienam sandoriui būtų iki 15%. Jei mažiau nei 5.000$, galima atidaryti sandorį už 20% nuo depozito. 2. Taip pat. Aš niekada …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @arcticaacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 374,954 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@arcticaacademy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arctica Academy™” (@arcticaacademy), 93 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arcticaacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.