Из рецензии на одну современную книгу о движении Степана Разина 🙈 #коллеги_пишут
🍓13😁5❤4💯1🔥1
Signed Nikita

Channel
@archeolife_rus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
459subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001745010087 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @archeolife_rus |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/archeolife_rus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 459 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 460 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 460 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,599 |
| Reactions total | 311 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
491 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 195 | 39.7% | |
| 🔥 | 82 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 78 | 15.9% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 5.91% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 3.05% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 2.85% | |
| 🍓 | 13 | 2.65% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 2.65% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 2.24% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 2.24% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 1.83% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 1.43% | |
| 🎄 | 6 | 1.22% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.611% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.407% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.204% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.204% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.204% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Из рецензии на одну современную книгу о движении Степана Разина 🙈 #коллеги_пишут
🍓13😁5❤4💯1🔥1
Signed Nikita
Некролог об Андрее Петровиче Богданове (1956–2026), моём учителе в летописеведении. https://www.academia.edu/171153774 (или файл в комментариях) А.П. ушёл внезапно, оставив обширное научное наследие и множество планов. #археограф_пишет_тексты
💔14👍1🕊1🙏1
Signed Nikita
Мне кажется, это очень хорошо: недооценил выдающуюся роль сосны! 🌲 Таким образом, ... С.И. Коржинский недооценил выдающуюся роль сосны и сосновых лесов на Приволжской возвышенности. #коллеги_пишут
😁10🎄6❤5
Signed Nikita
А вот фотокопия тех самых трёх записей летописчика Извольских с известиями о двух (как я полагаю) татарских набегах 1570 года. #лтпси
❤7👍4
Signed Nikita
Статья о некогда введённом мной в оборот летописчике дворян Извольских – наиболее раннем памятнике дворянского летописания. Здесь я анализирую наиболее «тёмное» место летописчика – записи о татарских набегах в канун сожжения Москвы Девлет-Гиреем (и, соответственно, спорю с М.А. Несиным). https://www.academia.edu/171049493 Текст посвящён памяти ушедшего год назад коллеги Ильи Агафонова, который очень интересовался э…
❤16🔥5👍2
Signed Nikita
В летописях есть всё: В Англи королю Якобусу Стуарту голову отсекли, судивши, а завотчик был аглинской генерал Кромвель. И как о том со объявлением ко дворам послы приехали от парламента аглинского — везде приняты, но из Руси от Архаггельскаго города государь велел отбить как бунтовщиков. А ко ушедшему из Англи королевскому сыну в Копенгаген послов с несколко тысящами червоных послать обещали, денгами и войским пом…
❤12🔥5💯4
Signed Nikita
Наш предшественник кофеман из Ирана середины XVII века ☕️ #иранство
❤16👍4🥰4
Signed Nikita
Ну очень хороший иранский кот-улыба из 1670-х 🐈 #иранство
❤18🥰9👍4
Signed Nikita
Когда не пускают в читальный зал без читательского 🪶 (На самом деле, ему запретили есть растение, и он очень недоволен) #археожизнь
😁19🔥4❤1
Signed Nikita
Заинтригован обстоятельствами появления этой статьи 👀 Текст, конечно, ни о чём, журнал «левый». Второй автор — философ, тут всё ясно. Но первый — мой однофамилец — сотрудник ИРИ РАН, д.и.н., серьёзный специалист по истории русского города XVIII—XIX веков. «Странных» текстов у него, кажется, нет. Как коллега сюда попал?! Быть может, он вообще не в курсе?!.. #о_разном_пишут
👀11🤔2
Signed Nikita
Нашёл пятый известный список Краткого Московского летописца, причём его 1-й редакции, до сих пор представленной одним списком. Не бог весть какая находка, но А.П. Богданов бы порадовался. Интересная преемственность: один список летописца нашёл В.И. Буганов, три — его ученик А.П. Богданов, один (пока что) — я, считающий себя учеником А.П. А ведь через неделю будет пять месяцев, как нет А.П. #археожизнь #лтпси
❤19😢10😱5👍3
Signed Nikita
Коллега Пётр Аваков добился ретракции плагиат-статьи, основным «источником» которой стала его монография об «Азовском проекте» Петра I. Если зайти в профиль плагиатчицы на elibrary, то можно обнаружить поразительное соседство 😁 #и_такое_пишут
🔥22😁3❤1
Signed Nikita
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @archeolife_rus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 508,970 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Будни Археографа” (@archeolife_rus), 459 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archeolife_rus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.