Channel
@apuindex
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
956subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001683601810 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @apuindex |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/apuindex |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 956 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 956 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,772 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🔎 Update for Monday; Aug 3rd, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $63,479 -0.04%⬇️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 31758 new tokens 🚀 5 still active with 3x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 36x total 🏆 $BNC is at 26x 🔷 ETH 🪙 83 new tokens 🚀 0 still active ♦️ SOL 🪙 3570 new tokens 🚀 40 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 180x total 🏆 $FROGE is at 68x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 10162 new tokens 🚀 17 still active…
🔎 Update for Sunday; Aug 2nd, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $63,507 1.15%⬆️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 30734 new tokens 🚀 5 still active with 2x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 11x total 🔷 ETH 🪙 140 new tokens 🚀 0 still active ♦️ SOL 🪙 3370 new tokens 🚀 17 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 40x total 🏆 $turtleneck is at 15x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 11595 new tokens 🚀 5 still active with 4x median …
🔎 30th Week of 2026 Recap by @ApuIndex (Jul 20th to Jul 26th) (⬆️⬇️ compared to the previous week) 🔶 BSC 🪙 10,266 new tokens ⬆️ +47.9% 💸 181 safe (1.8%) ⬇️ -3.7% 🚀 40 successful (0.4%) ⬇️ -9.1% 🏆 X two days after launch total: 60x ⬇️ -93.9% 🏆 Average 1x, Median 1x 🔷 ETH 🪙 455 new tokens ⬇️ -47.9% 💸 35 safe (7.7%) ⬆️ +169.2% 🚀 2 successful (0.4%) +∞ 🏆 X two days after launch t…
🔎 Update for Saturday; Aug 1st, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $62,784 -0.09%⬇️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 28815 new tokens 🚀 4 still active with 6x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 24x total 🏆 $Tesla Cat is at 11x 🔷 ETH 🪙 150 new tokens 🚀 0 still active ♦️ SOL 🪙 3307 new tokens 🚀 33 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 81x total 🏆 $Blink is at 20x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 9495 new tokens 🚀 4 still …
🔎 Update for Friday; Jul 31st, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $62,841 -2.93%⬇️⬇️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 26118 new tokens 🚀 12 still active with 2x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 74x total 🏆 $HODL is at 27x 🔷 ETH 🪙 133 new tokens 🚀 1 still active at 3x ♦️ SOL 🪙 3687 new tokens 🚀 33 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 49x total 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 10945 new tokens 🚀 17 still active with 1x med…
🔎 Update for Thursday; Jul 30th, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $64,737 1.21%⬆️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 7082 new tokens 🚀 4 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 5x total 🔷 ETH 🪙 136 new tokens 🚀 0 still active ♦️ SOL 🪙 3877 new tokens 🚀 45 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 74x total 🏆 $YETI is at 7x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 9174 new tokens 🚀 19 still active with 6x median 💸 Act…
🔎 Update for Wednesday; Jul 29th, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $63,963 0.05%⬆️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 1878 new tokens 🚀 5 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 6x total 🔷 ETH 🪙 131 new tokens 🚀 0 still active ♦️ SOL 🪙 4153 new tokens 🚀 45 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 157x total 🏆 $MACHA is at 35x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 10607 new tokens 🚀 23 still active with 2x median …
🔎 Update for Tuesday; Jul 28th, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $63,934 0.38%⬆️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 1012 new tokens 🚀 5 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 5x total 🔷 ETH 🪙 112 new tokens 🚀 0 still active ♦️ SOL 🪙 4094 new tokens 🚀 43 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 81x total 🏆 $CATJAK is at 11x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 8963 new tokens 🚀 23 still active with 4x median 💸 A…
🔎 Update for Monday; Jul 27th, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $63,694 -2.36%⬇️⬇️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 1049 new tokens 🚀 6 still active with 2x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 281x total 🏆 $MODA is at 198x 🔷 ETH 🪙 123 new tokens 🚀 1 still active 🏆 $CATE is at 7x ♦️ SOL 🪙 4548 new tokens 🚀 41 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 110x total 🏆 $UNTIE is at 12x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 8122 new t…
🔎 Update for Sunday; Jul 26th, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $65,234 1.49%⬆️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 4330 new tokens 🚀 4 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 7x total 🔷 ETH 🪙 93 new tokens 🚀 0 still active ♦️ SOL 🪙 4367 new tokens 🚀 20 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 250x total 🏆 $CATE is at 133x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 7711 new tokens 🚀 18 still active with 2x median 💸 Act…
🔎 Update for Saturday; Jul 25th, 2026 by @ApuIndex 🪙 $64,274 0.29%⬆️ 🔶 BSC 🪙 962 new tokens 🚀 9 still active with 2x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 23x total 🏆 $MQE is at 11x 🔷 ETH 🪙 59 new tokens 🚀 1 still active at 1x ♦️ SOL 🪙 4239 new tokens 🚀 36 still active with 1x median 💸 Active tokens currently at 69x total 🏆 $TRUMP2028 is at 8x 🪶 ROBINHOOD 🪙 5232 new tokens 🚀 10 still…
🔎 29th Week of 2026 Recap by @ApuIndex (Jul 13th to Jul 19th) (⬆️⬇️ compared to the previous week) 🔶 BSC 🪙 6,942 new tokens ⬇️ -19.6% 💸 188 safe (2.7%) ⬇️ -60.3% 🚀 44 successful (0.6%) ⬇️ -29.0% 🏆 X two days after launch total: 986x ⬆️ +508.6% 🏆 Average 22x, Median 1x 🔷 ETH 🪙 874 new tokens ⬇️ -50.5% 💸 13 safe (1.5%) ⬇️ -27.8% 🚀 0 successful (0.0%) +0.0% 🏆 X two days after la…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @apuindex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 189,767 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Apu Index” (@apuindex), 956 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apuindex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.