Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 개미굴 - 햇제 팝업스토어

Channel

개미굴 - 햇제 팝업스토어

@ants_village

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,457subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001806460731
TypeChannel
Username@ants_village
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ants_village

Growth

1,4281,4571,442.57 August 2026 — 1,428 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,434 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,433 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,457 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,424–1,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:381,457+24
11 Aug 2026, 02:411,433-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:231,434+6
7 Aug 2026, 10:171,428first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.9%
avg views ÷ 1,457 subscribers
Avg views / post
640
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,516
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ants_village. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC306 viewsread 7 August 2026

장량적으로 판단하기는 어렵지만 정성적으로는 약 70% 정도 해소가 되지 않았나 생각합니다

7 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC388 viewsread 7 August 2026

말씀드린대로 현재 주가가 불확실성을 상당 부분 반영한 수준이기에, 적어도 단기적으로 기대감 내러티브가 선반영된 불확실성을 이길 수 있습니다 이번주에 삼성전자와 하이닉스의 수익률은 각 -12%와 -17.2% 입니다 즉 하이닉스가 삼성전자 대비 약 5%p 정도 언더퍼폼했는데 이정도 '상대수익률' 격차는 다음주에 따라잡을 수 있지 않을까 예상합니다

7 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC454 viewsread 7 August 2026

그리고 사측의 대응이 꽤나 빠른 편입니다 앞으로 또다른 노이즈가 나오더라도, 그 노이즈의 사실 여부를 떠나서 사측의 추가적인 대응을 기대해 볼 수 있겠다는 생각입니다

7 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 7 August 2026

언제: 약 50일 내로 발표 무엇이: 모름. 다만 '추가 주주환원' 어떻게: 모름. 다만 '적극 겁토중' 50일이 조금 멀기는 하지만, 확실한 것이 한 가지 생겼습니다 하이닉스에서 여론을 의식한다는 점이 바로 그것입니다 - 최태원 회장의 48억 원 주식 매수 - 주주환원 발표 예정공시 - 시장 찌라시에 대응하는 기사 송출

7 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC329 viewsread 7 August 2026

✅ SK하이닉스, 엔비디아 HBM 반값 공급설에 "전혀 사실무근" https://www.inews24.com/view/1993001

7 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC217 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @athletes_villagePhoto

*SK하이닉스: 주주환원 방안 적극 검토..3분기 중 발표

7 Aug 2026, 03:22 UTC493 viewsread 7 August 2026

최근 신규 구독자 분들 유입이 좀 있었습니다 새로 들어오신 분들은 #공지 를 클릭해서 확인 부탁드립니다 확인하지 않으셨을 경우에 본 채널 내에서 발생할 수 있는 상대적 불이익에 대해 개미굴은 그 어떠한 경우에도 일절 책임지지 않습니다

7 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC568 viewsread 7 August 2026

이 루머의 사실 여부는 개미굴이 검증할 수 없습니다 다만 이런 루머가 시장에 돈지는 이미 좀 된 것으로 알고 있습니다 실제로 하이닉스 주가가 최근 많이 부진하기도 했고, 따라서 이러한 루머들은 현 주가 수준에는 이미 상당 부분 반영된 것이 아닐까라고 생각합니다

7 Aug 2026, 02:13 UTC372 views0 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @teamctrine

여의도 찌라시) 1. 지금 HBM3E는 닉스가 헐값에 엔비디아에 주고 있음. 연간 고정가라 전자는 범용 가격인상 팍팍해서 실적 좋은데 닉스는 분기별 이익 증가폭이 상대적으로 낮은 이유임. 2. HBM4는 닉스 불량 때문에 엔비디아에서 베라루빈 출시 지연된게 맞음 3. 엔비디아향 HBM4 스크닉스 내년 가격 인상폭 타 업체대비 낮을 듯(타업체 80% 이상 인상, 닉스는 50% 인상) 4. 대신 SK그룹에서 진행하는 데이터센터사업은 엔비디아칩 우선공급권 얻음 5. 이 얘기를 SK하이닉스 영업직원이 술자리에서 푸념함 6. SK하이닉스 출신 애널리스트 채민숙이 이 얘기를 듣고 여의도에 던짐 7. 7월 닉스 떡락 & SK 및 이터닉스 상한가 8. SK하이닉스에서 전말확인 후 채민숙 출입 밴함. 9. 매니저들이 다른 애널들 시켜서 사실

7 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTC553 views0 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

개미굴은 하이닉스도 결국 주주환원계획 등을 발표할 것이라고 '기대'합니다 언젠가는 어떻게든 무엇인가를 발표할 것이라고 생각하지만, 현재로서는 언제도 불확실, 어떻게도 불확실, 무엇인지도 불확실입니다 따라서, 지금 시점에서의 하이닉스는 바이오텍 주식 매매와 비슷합니다 공통점은 뭔가 나올 호재가 있대더라(라이선스 아웃/주주환원). 다만 언제, 무엇이, 어떻게 나올지는 모른다는 점이고 차이점은 밸류에이션에 기댈 언덕이 있느냐 없느냐일 것 같습니다 ... 다만 오해의 소지를 방지하기 위해 말씀드리자면, 상기 사항들은 주가의 절대적인 수익률이 아닌 상대적인 수익률 관점에서 고려해야 할 요소입니다 오늘, 그리고 다음주까지 시장은 아마도 방향성을 줄여가며 장중 변동성만 클 가능성이 있다고 생각합니다

6 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC670 views0 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

$SNDK 와 $WDC 모두 나쁘지 않은 실적에도 불구하고 장전 급락으로 시작해서 현재기준 양봉을 만들고 있습니다 오늘의 관전 포인트 중 하나는 이들 반도체 종목들이 하락 출발 후 장중에, 그리고 향후 며칠간 얼마나 반발 매수세가 들어올 것인가입니다 이것이 중요한 이유는 실적 발표 후 단순 셀온인지, 추세 이탈인지를 판단할 수 있기 때문입니다

6 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC756 viewsread 7 August 2026

이 글에서 주장하는 내용들 또한 일리가 있다고 생각합니다 검증되지 않은 내러티브는 사실이고, 자연 소멸할 가능성이 얼마나 높은지는 모르겠으나 아무튼 그런 가능성이 있는 것도 사실이며, 특히 미국 증권 집단소송 리스크 주장이 가장 설득력이 있다고 보입니다 다만, 개미굴이 보는 리스크의 핵심은 "불확실 / 의심 / 비구체적인 상황이 한동안 지속되는 것" 입니다 그 누가 제아무리 설득력있는 주장을 하건 그것은 의견, 주장, 또는 가설일 뿐이며, 사측에서 명확한 커뮤니케이션 또는 행동을 하지 않는 이상 이러한 불확실 / 의심 / 비구체적인 상황은 완전히 해소되지 않습니다 스윙 트레이딩의 경우, 불확실성이건 의혹이건 상관 없이 차트를 보고 매매 자리를 찾으면 그만입니다 그러나 포지션 트레이딩의 핵심은 '내가 이 회사를 믿고 스트레스 받지 않

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ants_village. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 724,279 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“개미굴 - 햇제 팝업스토어” (@ants_village), 1,457 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ants_village.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.