Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آنتی لنگی🔥

Channel

آنتی لنگی🔥

@antilongi

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,778subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001007067254
TypeChannel
Username@antilongi
Description🌟بزرگترین کانال آنتی لنگی در تلگرام🌟 🚫اینجا اولویت اول و آخر فقط دفاع از حق استقلاله نه اشخاص نه به شخص پرستی🛇 📣محتوای این کانال صرفا جنبه ورزشی دارد📣 انتقادات و پیشنهادات و تبلیغات👇👇👇👇 @Bibabbak
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/antilongi

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “🌟آنتی لنگی🌟” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@FCEsteghlale/226838 Nov 2026, 19:56 UTC@antilongi/156334 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 19:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@antilongi/156364 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC@FCEsteghlale/227139 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC0.98under a minute
@FCEsteghlale/205081 Sept 2026, 16:24 UTC@antilongi/153823 · this entry1 Sept 2026, 16:24 UTC0.98under a minute
@FCEsteghlale/225254 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC@antilongi/156158 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC0.98under a minute
@FCEsteghlale/225365 Nov 2026, 10:23 UTC@antilongi/156169 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 10:23 UTC0.98under a minute
@FCEsteghlale/227069 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC@antilongi/156357 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC0.96under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@FCEsteghlale50 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minutethis entry (31–19)
@Esteqhlal20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9620 minutes@Esteqhlal (17–3)
@Esteghlali19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9440 minutes@Esteghlali (19–0)
@esteghlalpage19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9743 minutes@esteghlalpage (19–0)
@EsteghlalTelegram18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9731 minutes@EsteghlalTelegram (16–2)
@Esteghlallinews16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9735 minuteseven
@khabarvarzeshiii15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minutethis entry (9–6)
@es_qb12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9644 minutes@es_qb (10–2)
@esteghlal_ss12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9534 minutes@esteghlal_ss (9–3)
@TAj_newsj11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9721 minutes@TAj_newsj (11–0)
@esteghlalfan10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.952.1 hours@esteghlalfan (7–3)
@Es_t48 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9240 minutes@Es_t4 (6–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 174 of the 179 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 472 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @antilongi — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,77711,81811,797.55 August 2026 — 11,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,791 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,789 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,788 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,791 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,798 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,807 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,810 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,811 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,815 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,814 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,812 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,806 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,807 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,804 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,800 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,797 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,794 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,814 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,817 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,804 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,799 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,794 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,810 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,818 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,816 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,812 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,802 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,794 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,796 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,794 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,797 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,792 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,791 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,789 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,793 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,792 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,791 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,790 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,787 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,786 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,785 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,783 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,781 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,779 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,778 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,777 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,781 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,782 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,780 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,778 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,784 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,782 subscribers10 November 2026 — 11,783 subscribers12 November 2026 — 11,778 subscribers11,7785 August 202612 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,771–11,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 00:2111,778-5
10 Nov 2026, 00:1911,783+1
8 Nov 2026, 14:4911,782-2
7 Nov 2026, 11:1411,784+6
6 Nov 2026, 08:4911,778-2
5 Nov 2026, 10:5011,780-2
4 Nov 2026, 09:3111,782+1
3 Nov 2026, 10:2011,781+4
1 Nov 2026, 10:3511,777-1
31 Oct 2026, 14:0611,778-1
30 Oct 2026, 14:4911,779-2
29 Oct 2026, 14:1511,781-2
27 Oct 2026, 13:0711,783-2
26 Oct 2026, 14:0611,785-1
25 Oct 2026, 15:1411,786-1
24 Oct 2026, 15:3011,787-3
23 Oct 2026, 15:2811,790-1
22 Oct 2026, 14:0811,791-1
21 Oct 2026, 08:4511,792-1
20 Oct 2026, 09:0811,793first reading

Engagement

901 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 11,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
255 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
255
of 901 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 209 of 255 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held901 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total383,772
Reactions total7,640
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈59,600
Videos
≈15,300
Links
≈3,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 33m
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 205 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18,165 reactions across 687 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,40129.7%
🔥4,71526.0%
😁3,07716.9%
🤬1,7739.76%
❤‍🔥1,0926.01%
💔6503.58%
👎6433.54%
😐3161.74%
😍2151.18%
🏆1560.859%
😢850.468%
😱280.154%
😭140.077%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 703 of the 901 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,357 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 901 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 255 posts held from the last 30 days (1.96%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTC513 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

سهراب به باشگاه گفته اواسط نیم فصل دوم در رابطه با چشمی، رستم، مهران و ماشا نسبت به عملکردشون برای تمدید تصمیم خواهم گرفت! 🆔 @antilongi 🔥

🏆12👍2

13 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC529 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @FootbaIIDarkNewsPhoto

🇪🇺 لاله‌های نارنجی در آزمونی سخت مقابل یونان! 🔥 [ هلند 🇳🇱 🆚 🇬🇷 یونان ] ⚽️ هلند با تکیه بر کیفیت فنی بالاتر و گردش سریع توپ، به‌دنبال کنترل جریان بازی و ایجاد موقعیت از کناره‌هاست. یونان با ساختار دفاعی فشرده و انتقال‌های سریع می‌تواند دردسرساز شود، به‌خصوص اگر فضای پشت مدافعان هلند را پیدا کند. برتری هلند در خلاقیت و قدرت هجومی است، اما عبور از دفاع منظم یونان به صبر و دقت در یک‌سوم پایانی نیاز دارد. با بازگشت فرنک…

13 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC874 views28 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

استوری هاشمیان پس از حواشی در باشگاه پرسپولیس 😂😂🤣 🆔 @antilongi 🔥

😁27👍1

13 Nov 2026, 06:58 UTC924 viewsread 13 November 2026

برنامه مسابقات امروز 22 آبان + پخش زنده دیدار دوستانه فوتبال / عربستان - کره جنوبی / ساعت 18 دیدار دوستانه فوتبال / قطر - استرالیا / ساعت 18:15 لیگ ملت‌های اروپا / هلند - یونان / ساعت 23:15 لیگ ملت‌های اروپا / صربستان - آلمان / ساعت 23:15

12 Nov 2026, 21:54 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @FootbaIIDarkNewsPhoto

🇪🇺 نبرد عقاب‌ها و ژرمن‌ها؛ آلمان در بلگراد به‌دنبال بازگشت به مسیر صعود! 🔥 [ صربستان 🇷🇸 🆚🇩🇪 آلمان ] ⚽️ [ نکات کلیدی و مهم ]:👇 1⃣. آلمان با ۵ امتیاز در رتبه سوم گروه قرار دارد و برای زنده نگه‌داشتن شانس صعود به برد نیاز مبرم دارد. 2⃣. صربستان هر چهار مسابقه قبلی را باخته و با غیبت لوکیچ و ماکسیموویچ، خط میانی آسیب‌پذیرتری خواهد داشت. 3⃣. غیبت موسیالا و گنبری از قدرت هجومی آلمان کم می‌کند؛ اما ویرتز و هاورتز همچنان …

12 Nov 2026, 21:19 UTC≈1,380 views41 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⏺باشگاه استقلال به رأی کمیته انضباطی درباره آسانی اعتراض خواهد کرد و این پرونده را برای تجدیدنظر به کمیته استیناف خواهد برد/ فارس 🆔 @antilongi 🔥

👍41

12 Nov 2026, 20:28 UTC≈1,520 views48 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

یادی کنیم از مصاحبه تاریخی فرهاد که می‌گفت تیم من ۱۰ نفره هم نمیبازه، راه های دیگه ای رو انتخاب کنید، مثلا ۹ نفره کنید و اما تیم سهراب ۹ نفره هم نباخت! 🆔 @antilongi 🔥

🔥48

12 Nov 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,670 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

واکنش پژمان ماندگاری به رای محرومیت یاسر آسانی👌 💙 🆔 @antilongi 🔥

🔥48👍3😁1

12 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,770 views70 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

استقلال باید از ایلدروم بابت تلاش عامدانه برای ضربه زدن به استقلال در سال‌های اخیر به دادگاه شکایت ببره و درخواست کنه حساب‌ها و تراکنش‌های مالی او و خانواده‌ش در تمام سال‌های گذشته بررسی بشه. مطمئنا این آدم فاسد ارتباط پشت پرده با لنگیا داره. داوری که در ماجرای دربی جام حذفی اون دروغ رو درباره ساپینتو گفت و امسال هم در حالیکه لنگیا پیگیر محروم کردن آسانی بودن، این حرکت رو برای تحریک این بازیکن انجام داد قطعا با لنگی…

👍70

12 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,790 views37 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

سهراب تا نیم فصل عملا تیمش فلج فلجه! بازیکن تعویضی خاصی نداره و بازیکنا هم یا مصدومن یا محروم! 🆔 @antilongi 🔥

👍32😢5

12 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,790 views110 reactionsread 13 November 2026

پیمان حدادی مدیرعامل پیروزی بعد از حکم فیفا و قانونی بودن آسانی اعلام کرد، از فیفا به سازمان ملل شکایت میکنیم 🆔 @antilongi 🔥

😁108👎2

12 Nov 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,840 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026

باشگاه شنبه اعتراض میزنه احتمال داره رای رو بشکنن و بشه ۲ جلسه تعلیقی مشابهش زیاد داشتیم و دور از دسترس نیست. 🆔 @antilongi 🔥

👍51

Showing the 12 most recent of 901 posts we hold for @antilongi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @antilongi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
7.6 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⭐️ استقلال ⭐️
@Esteqhlal · 20,768
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
کانال هواداران استقلال
@Esteghlali · 30,757
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
استقلال تلگرام
@EsteghlalTelegram · 26,239
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Esteghlalir News️️
@Esteghlalir_News · 47,115
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
کانال هواداران استقلال
@esteghlalfc · 94,765
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
تـاج | اسـتقـلال
@Esteghlal · 99,268
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
کانال هواداری استقلال
@Havadarii_esteghlal · 12
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
Zahedaniha | زاهدانی‌ ها
@zahedanihaa · 51,924
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آنتی لنگی🔥” (@antilongi), 11,778 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antilongi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.