Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for استقلال نیوز

Channel

استقلال نیوز

@Esteghlal_News

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,784subscribers

-102 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001002215395
TypeChannel
Username@Esteghlal_News
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Esteghlal_News

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,78412,88612,8355 August 2026 — 12,886 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,886 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,880 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,873 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,866 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,863 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,862 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,859 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,850 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,864 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,866 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,865 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,868 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,866 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,862 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,863 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,858 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,869 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,867 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,860 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,859 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,856 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,850 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,854 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,846 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,827 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,815 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,801 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,798 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,794 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,784 subscribers5 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,769–12,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:4212,784-10
15 Sept 2026, 17:0112,794-4
14 Sept 2026, 00:5812,798-3
12 Sept 2026, 07:4012,801-14
9 Sept 2026, 23:5812,815-12
6 Sept 2026, 16:4012,827-19
2 Sept 2026, 19:1612,846-8
1 Sept 2026, 16:3312,854+4
31 Aug 2026, 12:5712,850-6
30 Aug 2026, 14:2812,856-3
29 Aug 2026, 13:4412,859-1
28 Aug 2026, 15:5712,860-7
27 Aug 2026, 18:5412,867-2
26 Aug 2026, 21:4512,869+11
25 Aug 2026, 23:4712,858-5
25 Aug 2026, 01:0512,863+1
23 Aug 2026, 13:5512,862-4
20 Aug 2026, 18:1612,866-2
19 Aug 2026, 15:5312,868+3
18 Aug 2026, 13:2812,865first reading

Engagement

532 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 12,784 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
240 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
240
of 532 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 208 of 240 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held532 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total371,367
Reactions total5,613
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 32m
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 90 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12,071 reactions across 462 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,10742.3%
2,92324.2%
🤣1,36811.3%
🔥9828.14%
🤬6385.29%
💔3853.19%
👎3833.17%
🗿1080.895%
😐1020.845%
😁490.406%
🖕260.215%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 482 of the 532 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,431 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 532 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC339 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

اسلامی: استقلال سهراب عالیه ، امیدوارم آخر فصل اتفاق خوبی برامون بیوفته. خداروشکر پاس گل هم دادم، قبل تمرینشو انجام داده بودیم. @Esteghlal_News

11👍2

2 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC944 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

وریا غفوری: آسانی برای یکی از هموطنان که وضعیت مالی خوبی نداشته خونه خریده. @Esteghlal_News

44🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,120 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

بختیاری‌زاده: از مردم شریف اصفهان، مسئولین هیات فوتبال اصفهان و باشگاه سپاهان که شرایط را برای هر دو تیم فراهم کردند، تشکر می‌کنم. اگر یکی دو نفر روی سکو کار اشتباهی انجام می‌دهند، ما همه هواداران را غیر حرفه‌ای خطاب کنیم. بطری پرتاب کردن و لیزر انداختن از طرف هرکسی اشتباه است. @Esteghlal_News

👍11

2 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,100 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

سهراب: فرعباسی دروازه‌بان بی تجربه‌ای نیست و کسی که در استقلال است، یعنی لیاقت بازی کردن را دارد و وظیفه کادرفنی است که بر اساس شناخت از حریف و خواسته‌های فنی به بازیکنان شانس بازی دهد. @Esteghlal_News

👍10

2 Sept 2026, 19:13 UTC≈1,160 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

سهراب: استقلال امروز خوب بود و باید کمی در لحظه آخر بیشتر دقت کنیم. ان‌شاءالله بازی برگشت را بتوانیم ببریم. بازیکنان وقتی توپ را از دست می‌دهند خیلی جدی و با تمرکز به حالت دفاعی برمی‌گردند. @Esteghlal_News

12👍4

2 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC≈1,130 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

بختیاری‌زاده: فکر می‌کنم اگر آقا مهدی (تارتار) بازی را دوباره ببیند، نظرش عوض می‌شود. اوت دستی یکی از راهکارهای ضربه زدن به حریف است ولی ما جزو تیم‌هایی هستیم که بازیکنی نداریم بتواند اوت دستی به آن صورت در باکس حریف بیاندازد. من بازیکنانم را تحسین می‌کنم چون دو بازی را در مدت زمانی کوتاهی انجام دادند. @Esteghlal_News

👍123

2 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,130 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

سهراب: ما تلاش کردیم تا بازهم گل بزنیم. در نیمه دوم، سه یا چهار موقعیت خیلی خوب داشتیم. @Esteghlal_News

👍122

2 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,130 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🎙️ سهراب بختیاری‌زاده: - کسانی که بازی را دیدند، از این بازی لذت بردند و از دربی‌هایی بود که حاشیه به آن شکل نداشت. - در نیمه دوم ما تغییراتی دادیم، به دلیل اینکه در نیمه اول نظم بازی را در میانه زمین به حریف داده بودیم و این موضوع را رفع کردیم. - روی یک غافلگیری گل خوردیم ولی برگشتیم و این نکته مهمی است. - می‌شد گل‌های دیگری هم بزنیم. - هیچوقت درباره داوری قضاوت نکرده‌ام ولی دو هفته است که اتفاقاتی رخ می‌دهد. در با

👍10

2 Sept 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,100 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سپاهان هم با صنعت نفت بدون گل مساوی کرد @Esteghlal_News

👍12

2 Sept 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,250 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026

مارک کلاتنبرگ: داور باید حسین کنعانی رو اخراج میکرد. @Esteghlal_News

👍25👎2

2 Sept 2026, 18:48 UTC≈1,340 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سعید فتاحی: به ما اعلام شده استقلال میتونه نیم فصل بازیکن جذب کنه پ.ن: کاش این دروغت راست باشه آقا سعید @Esteghlal_News

👍151

2 Sept 2026, 18:44 UTC≈1,400 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

لحظه حمله کنعانی‌ به عارف آقاسی که منجر به خونریزی گلوی آقاسی شد و داور هم این صحنه را ندید (نخواست ببینه!) @Esteghlal_News

🤬29🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 532 posts we hold for @Esteghlal_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

محافظ
@IR_football365 · 2
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
ورزش فوری
@fori_sport · 62,906
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
هواشناسی ایران
@iran_weather · 62,173
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
⭐️ استقلال ⭐️
@Esteqhlal · 23,169
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
کانال هواداران استقلال
@Esteghlali · 30,269
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
استقلال تلگرام
@EsteghlalTelegram · 29,651
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
خبر آنلاین
@KhabarIRwr · 63,374
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“استقلال نیوز” (@Esteghlal_News), 12,784 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Esteghlal_News.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.