Channel
@antihipstaswag
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,323subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001063226247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @antihipstaswag |
| Created | 25 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/antihipstaswag |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 3,323 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 3,324 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 3,325 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 3,329 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 3,333 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 3,336 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 3,337 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 3,338 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 3,340 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 3,340 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 28 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
155 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 59.4% | |
| 😁 | 33 | 21.3% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 12.9% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 5.16% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2024 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Клиенты хотят Chanel Блази. 5 марта в магазины в Париже поступила дебютная коллекция Матье, но не многим удалось ее приобрести. Яна Маккилоп хотела примерить туфли, но 45! минут в очереди ждать не стала. Николь Охримович повезло больше и с покупкой она все же вышла из бутика. А теперь и Vogue Business пишут про клиентский ажиотаж. Самое интересное: ▪️«Я никогда не видел такого безумия и суматохи, когда все редакторы…
❤20
Photo, posted without a caption
Фиби значит можно заниматься самоцитированием, а мне нет? Подумал Марк и сделал коллабу Stephen Sprouse x Marc Jacobs 🤭
😁13❤5
Увидел на сайте ритейлера новый дроп Боннер&Adidas и порадовался, что который год немецкий гигант сотрудничает с классной маркой. Сбился со счету какой по счету и…сильно захотелось знать детали контракта:) Adidas и Канье все устраивало, судя по количеству совместных дропов в прошлой жизни) Мне же интересны детали многократных дропов (и соглашений:) Adidas с дизайнерами: Уєлс Боннер, Ксенией Шнайдер и Эмили Оберг. И…
❤10
Все мы знаем, как Miu Miu дает закусить губу всему рынку люкса в показателях роста выручки и ниспадающем интересе клиентов к продукту на всех уголках земного шара. Однако у бренда интересные перестановки. Компания назначила Сильвию Онофри, бывшего президента Napapijri корпорации VF, своим новым генеральным директором в феврале этого года. Что по опыту? Начала карьеру в Bulgari, а потом были 15 лет работы в Bally, но…
❤6👀6👏1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Ханья Янагихара запостила в сториз ссылочку на любознательный материал про 25 моделей обуви и сумок, которые изменили моду. Группа экспертов рассматривали аксессуары за последние 100 лет. Номинанты должны соответствовать двум критериям из списка: аксессуар должен был быть разработан после 1925 года и продаваться в магазинах. Поэтому в список не вошли легендарные туфли Armadillo от Alexander McQueen. Рекомендую озна…
❤15🔥1
Увидел красивые кампейны всем известных марок и подумал, что за чудо стилист/агентство за этим стоит? А это AI🤖🫢 И тут сразу назрел резонный вопрос: а нужно ли в 2025 году подписывать контракт с лучшими специалистами индустрии и тратить несколько десятков тысяч долларов на кампейны, если AI может сделать классный результат гораздо дешевле и с минимумом задействованных в процессе рук/умов? Титаны люкса, такие как Lor…
👏19❤13👀2
Даже Жакмюсик намекает публично показывает свои хотелки в инсте, а ты стесняешься?)
😁13❤3
Классная история про то, что не нужно себя считать самым хитровыебанным 😁 или «фиг вам, а не Пьер Кадо»!
❤7😁3
Наоми Кэмпбелл запретили быть попечителем благотворительной организации в течении 5 лет после того, как надзорные органы выявили многочисленные доказательства финансовых махинаций в основанной ею благотворительной организации по борьбе с бедностью. В этой истории хочется напомнить базовый урок фин грамотности: разделяй и никогда не оплачивай со счета бизнеса личные нужды🤭 Сначала переводим на личную карту, налоги зап…
❤13😁4
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @antihipstaswag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANTIHIPSTASWAG” (@antihipstaswag), 3,323 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antihipstaswag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.