Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ❤️Аморальная Штучка❤️

Channel

❤️Аморальная Штучка❤️

@amoralnell

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

24,105subscribers

+609 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001688571929
TypeChannel
Username@amoralnell
DescriptionСвязь @Amoral_Nelly_bot Знакомства свидания вечеринки Откровенные истории Смелые эксперименты, сексуальные приключения бишки Свинг, жмж, мжм, сексвайф, хотвайф, БДСМ, куколд, би, лесби Реклама: https://t.me/clubnelly
Created13 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/amoralnell

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,44224,10523,773.56 August 2026 — 23,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,494 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,473 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,452 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,448 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,442 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,511 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,551 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,536 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,534 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,566 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,542 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,520 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,516 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,505 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,501 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,509 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,522 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,500 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,509 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,565 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,625 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,660 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,668 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,649 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,658 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,642 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,664 subscribers7 September 2026 — 23,896 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,984 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24,066 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,076 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,052 subscribers18 September 2026 — 24,105 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +609. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,343–24,204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:5724,105+53
16 Sept 2026, 05:3824,052-24
14 Sept 2026, 08:5624,076+10
12 Sept 2026, 18:1624,066+82
10 Sept 2026, 20:5623,984+88
7 Sept 2026, 21:1623,896+232
4 Sept 2026, 21:0023,664+22
3 Sept 2026, 08:1323,642-16
2 Sept 2026, 00:5823,658+9
1 Sept 2026, 03:0723,649-19
31 Aug 2026, 05:3923,668+8
30 Aug 2026, 03:1123,660+35
29 Aug 2026, 03:1323,625+60
28 Aug 2026, 03:4723,565+56
27 Aug 2026, 02:4523,509+9
25 Aug 2026, 23:2923,500-22
25 Aug 2026, 02:5823,522+13
23 Aug 2026, 21:2523,509+8
22 Aug 2026, 08:5823,501-4
20 Aug 2026, 22:2723,505first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.11%
avg views ÷ 24,105 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 91 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held91 (30 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total74,691
Reactions total1,231
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 19:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈778
Videos
≈102
Links
≈2,150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
33s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,299 reactions across 91 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,25338.0%
🔥57417.4%
👍50815.4%
🤣40012.1%
💯1524.61%
🤔742.24%
👏672.03%
👌300.909%
😁300.909%
🥰240.727%
🍓230.697%
🦄170.515%
👀160.485%
🆒150.455%
🍌130.394%
🕊120.364%
🙏110.333%
⚡100.303%
❤‍🔥100.303%
🏆80.242%
11 further kinds521.58%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 91 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amoralnell. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 91 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC658 views9 reactionsread 29 September 2026

ИДЕАЛЬНОЕ ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ ДЛЯ ЗНАКОМСТВА каким должно быть? Создатели нового дейтинг-приложения решили спросить об этом у вас: 👌 что вам нравится в существующих сервисах? ❤️что бесит ❤️чего не хватает ❤️что хотелось бы изменить Поделитесь своим мнением в небольшом анонимном опросе: 👉https://forms.yandex.ru/u/6aac0bb5493639108afc8abf Ваши ответы помогут сделать новый сервис удобнее и интереснее для тех, кто действите…

🐳5👌3🤣1

29 Sept 2026, 04:03 UTC≈1,130 views41 reactionsread 29 September 2026

ПЕРВЫЙ СЕКС ВСЕГДА КОМОМ Наткнулась я тут на мнение, что первый секс практически всегда плохой. Поэтому на него вообще не стоит обращать внимания: обязательно надо попробовать второй, третий разик — глядишь, что-нибудь и получится. Но я не согласна. В моём опыте было достаточно очень хороших, ярких первых сексов. Бывало даже наоборот: первый секс — восхитительный, встречаемся второй, третий раз — и уже не то. Инт…

❤30🔥7🤔2🍌1🤣1

28 Sept 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,480 views33 reactionsread 29 September 2026

ВСЕГДА БУДЕТ СЕКС, ЕСЛИ ДЕЛАТЬ ТАК - в переделанном ролике на моём Ютуб Это иначе смонтированная и переделанная версия про страсть и бытовуху. Та версия не залетела. Вот, я ее переупаковала и решила перевыложить, так как считаю ролик очень полезным.

❤15🔥12🏆3👍1💯1🤣1

28 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC≈1,670 views66 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Как же меня уже заебало, что любого темпераментного человека с высокой потребностью в сексе автоматически записывают в предатели, обманщики и ненадёжные партнёры. Особенно если этот человек — женщина. Хотя где тут связь, блин? Обманывать, предавать и изменять могут люди с любым темпераментом и половой конституцией, но заранее клеймят только таких, как я. Отдалась на первом свидании? Будет изменять, легко предаст!…

❤33💯18🤣5👍3🔥3👌2❤‍🔥1🍌1

27 Sept 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,730 views6 reactionsread 29 September 2026

ПРЯМОЙ ЭФИР https://youtube.com/live/FClSJzQ8rQI?feature=share

👍5🤣1

27 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,750 views17 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Интересуетесь свингом и не знаете, где искать партнёров? Напоминаю👇 🛩 Свинг-сообщества и свинг-вечеринки — самое верное место, где можно найти какие угодно приключения! Там и свои закрытые чаты реальных практикующих свингеров есть, и много полезной информации по Теме . ❤️ Swing Ликбез — от теории к практике.

❤12🔥3🤣2

27 Sept 2026, 04:01 UTC≈1,850 views56 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Представлять других людей во время секса #архив по выходным «Большинство людей во время секса в голове о чём-то фантазируют и крайне редко — о текущем партнёре (если это не медовый месяц)», — прочитала я замечание подписчика и крепко задумалась. Я с этой фразой моментально не согласилась, потому что к этому «большинству» не принадлежу. Но, возможно, он прав и большинство людей трахают одних, представляя на их мест…

❤26💯13👍9🤣3⚡2🤝2👏1

26 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,890 views32 reactionsread 29 September 2026

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ Я хочу завтра, 27.10, снова провести прямой эфир на Ютуб. Пока что с недостаточным оборудованием, но что ж поделаешь. ⏰ В 19:00 (Киев, МСК, Бухарест) - время в этих городах совпадает сейчас. Какую тему хотели бы обсудить? На все вопросы, оставленные под этим постом, отвечу на эфире бесплатно. Запись эфиров сохранять не буду, оставлю доступ только для спонсоров.

🥰11❤‍🔥5❤4👍4👌3🤣3🍌1🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC≈1,970 views108 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Единственное, возник вопрос: почему не может задонатить «драгоценное солнышко» для оказавшейся в беде «кицюни»? Вот эту дуру, которая задала подобный вопрос, я заблокировала. Какой мразью надо быть, чтобы писать подобное о человеке, который живёт в воюющей стране, под ежедневными бомбёжками и угрозой попасться ТЦК; чей бизнес арестован из-за бешеной коррупции с целью выбить денег и у кого уже 3,5 года тянутся бескон…

❤61🔥21🤣10💯9💔4🤗2🍌1

25 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,940 views15 reactionsread 29 September 2026

❤️ОГРОМНОЕ СПАСИБО ЗА ПОМОЩЬ! Собрано 205 евро из 600, необходимых для плкупки DJI Osmo Pocket 4P Купить мои гайды и приватку со скидкой 50% или задонатить на камеру DJI Osmo Pocket 4P можно по реквизитам👇 📌Крипта: USDT (TRON/TRC20) TJNdSNxocXMSqefuodTEnQACvxX6sArno2 📌Revolut: revolut.me/nellib79 📌Paysend: 5363542096869269 (Nelli Bilousova, PrivatBank) 📌PayPal: [email protected] 📌Украина реквизиты: А-Банк: 432…

❤9🤣3👍2🤗1

25 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,960 views8 reactionsread 29 September 2026

«Глянец для всех, а это — для своих» 🖤 Эта папка — концентрат свободы. Мы убрали лишнее и оставили только то, что будоражит: от первых робких шагов в раскрепощении до эстетического оргазма, который дарят наши ню-фотографы 📸✨ Здесь смешались смыслы и инстинкты: 💚 красивые девушки без комплексов 💚 смелые практики 💚 сервисы знакомств 💚 изнанка лайфстайла Заходи. Здесь красиво, честно и немного стыдно 🫦 https://t.me…

❤4🤣3🆒1

25 Sept 2026, 04:02 UTC≈2,060 views48 reactionsread 29 September 2026

У меня есть одна странная особенность. Я крайне редко называю своих мужчин по имени. У меня бывали отношения, когда я могла ни разу за всё время не обратиться к мужчине по имени. Ну, если всё же это были многолетние истории, то, может, раз-два в год и набиралось таких обращений. Причём мне реально прямо тяжело называть мужчину по имени вслух. И все разы, когда я это делала, приходилось прямо усилие над собой соверш…

❤24👍15🤔5💯2🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @amoralnell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@amoralnell edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTCAnonymous Poll80 voters

🧑‍🦰В ФОТОБАТЛЕ ЗА КОГО ГОЛОСОВАЛИ?

  1. 1️⃣18%
  2. 2️⃣10%
  3. 3️⃣11%
  4. 4️⃣14%
  5. 5️⃣8%
  6. 6️⃣3%
  7. 7️⃣19%
  8. 8️⃣6%
  9. 9️⃣5%
  10. 1️⃣0️⃣8%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❤️Аморальная Штучка❤️” (@amoralnell), 24,105 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amoralnell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.